Intercomparison of Planetary Boundary Layer Heights Using Remote Sensing Retrievals and ERA5 Reanalysis over Central Amazonia

The atmospheric boundary layer height (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) is a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cléo Quaresma Dias-Júnior, Rayonil Gomes Carneiro, Gilberto Fisch, Flávio Augusto F. D’Oliveira, Matthias Sörgel, Santiago Botía, Luiz Augusto T. Machado, Stefan Wolff, Rosa Maria N. dos Santos, Christopher Pöhlker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/14/18/4561
Description
Summary:The atmospheric boundary layer height (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>) is a key parameter in the vertical transport of mass, energy, moisture, and chemical species between the surface and the free atmosphere. There is a lack of long-term and continuous observations of <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>, however, particularly for remote regions, such as the Amazon forest. Reanalysis products, such as ERA5, can fill this gap by providing temporally and spatially resolved information on <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>. In this work, we evaluate the ERA5 estimates of <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-ERA5) for two locations in the Amazon and corrected them by means of ceilometer, radiosondes, and SODAR measurements (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-experimental). The experimental data were obtained at the remote Amazon Tall Tower Observatory (ATTO) with its pristine tropical forest cover and the T3 site downwind of the city of Manaus with a mixture of forest (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>63</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>), pasture (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>17</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>), and rivers (<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mn>20</mn><mo>%</mo></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>). We focus on the rather typical year 2014 and the El Niño year 2015. The comparison of the experimental vs. ERA5 <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula> data yielded the following results: (i) <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-ERA5 underestimates <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-experimental daytime at the T3 site for both years 2014 (30%, underestimate) and 2015 (15%, underestimate); (ii) <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-ERA5 overestimates <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-experimental daytime at ATTO site (12%, overestimate); (iii) during nighttime, no significant correlation between the <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-experimental and <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-ERA5 was observed. Based on these findings, we propose a correction for the daytime <inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><mi>z</mi><mi>i</mi></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>-ERA5, for both sites and for both years, which yields a better agreement between experimental and ERA5 data. These results and corrections are relevant for studies at ATTO and the T3 site and can likely also be applied at further locations in the Amazon.
ISSN:2072-4292