U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice
As policy organizations consider strategies to mitigate climate change, decarbonization initiatives can also reduce health-impacting air pollutants and may affect the associated racial disparities of adverse effects. With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CO-Benefits Risk Assessment Health Im...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
IOP Publishing
2022-01-01
|
| Series: | Environmental Research Letters |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac99ef |
| _version_ | 1797747293835755520 |
|---|---|
| author | Ciaran L Gallagher Tracey Holloway |
| author_facet | Ciaran L Gallagher Tracey Holloway |
| author_sort | Ciaran L Gallagher |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | As policy organizations consider strategies to mitigate climate change, decarbonization initiatives can also reduce health-impacting air pollutants and may affect the associated racial disparities of adverse effects. With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CO-Benefits Risk Assessment Health Impacts Screening Tool (COBRA), we compare three decarbonization scenarios and their impacts at the regional and county scales. COBRA calculates changes in county-level ambient fine particulate matter (PM _2.5 ), and associated mortality impacts, for each decarbonization scenario. We compare these patterns with demographic data to evaluate the relative exposure reduction benefit across race and ethnicity. Carbon-free electricity would reduce national average ambient PM _2.5 concentrations by 0.21 μ g m ^−3 , compared with a 0.19 μ g m ^−3 reduction associated with carbon-free industrial activity, and a 0.08 μ g m ^−3 reduction associated with carbon-free light duty vehicle (LDV) transportation. Decarbonization strategies also vary in terms of the racial groups most benefitting from each scenario, due to regional and urban/rural patterns in emission sources and population demographics. Black populations are the only group to experience relative exposure reduction benefits compared to the total population in every scenario, with industrial decarbonization yielding 23% greater reductions in ambient PM _2.5 concentrations for Black populations than for the total U.S. population. The largest relative reduction in PM _2.5 exposure was found for Asian populations in the carbon-free LDV transportation scenario (53%). The magnitudes of total air quality improvements by scenario vary across regions of the U.S., and generally do not align with the decarbonization policy that achieves the largest equity goal. Only the transportation decarbonization scenario meets the criteria of the Justice40 Initiative nationwide, fulfilling the 2021 commitment by U.S. President Biden that federal investments in clean energy are designed to allocate at least 40% of benefits to disadvantaged communities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:48:40Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-27af334f393e4b8eb7d86aa28a8e2255 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1748-9326 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-12T15:48:40Z |
| publishDate | 2022-01-01 |
| publisher | IOP Publishing |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Environmental Research Letters |
| spelling | doaj.art-27af334f393e4b8eb7d86aa28a8e22552023-08-09T15:18:16ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262022-01-01171111401810.1088/1748-9326/ac99efU.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justiceCiaran L Gallagher0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6460-1206Tracey Holloway1Nelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin—Madison , Madison, WI 53705, United States of AmericaNelson Institute Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment, University of Wisconsin—Madison , Madison, WI 53705, United States of America; Department of Atmospheric and Oceanic Sciences, University of Wisconsin—Madison , Madison, WI 53705, United States of AmericaAs policy organizations consider strategies to mitigate climate change, decarbonization initiatives can also reduce health-impacting air pollutants and may affect the associated racial disparities of adverse effects. With the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency CO-Benefits Risk Assessment Health Impacts Screening Tool (COBRA), we compare three decarbonization scenarios and their impacts at the regional and county scales. COBRA calculates changes in county-level ambient fine particulate matter (PM _2.5 ), and associated mortality impacts, for each decarbonization scenario. We compare these patterns with demographic data to evaluate the relative exposure reduction benefit across race and ethnicity. Carbon-free electricity would reduce national average ambient PM _2.5 concentrations by 0.21 μ g m ^−3 , compared with a 0.19 μ g m ^−3 reduction associated with carbon-free industrial activity, and a 0.08 μ g m ^−3 reduction associated with carbon-free light duty vehicle (LDV) transportation. Decarbonization strategies also vary in terms of the racial groups most benefitting from each scenario, due to regional and urban/rural patterns in emission sources and population demographics. Black populations are the only group to experience relative exposure reduction benefits compared to the total population in every scenario, with industrial decarbonization yielding 23% greater reductions in ambient PM _2.5 concentrations for Black populations than for the total U.S. population. The largest relative reduction in PM _2.5 exposure was found for Asian populations in the carbon-free LDV transportation scenario (53%). The magnitudes of total air quality improvements by scenario vary across regions of the U.S., and generally do not align with the decarbonization policy that achieves the largest equity goal. Only the transportation decarbonization scenario meets the criteria of the Justice40 Initiative nationwide, fulfilling the 2021 commitment by U.S. President Biden that federal investments in clean energy are designed to allocate at least 40% of benefits to disadvantaged communities.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac99efreduced-form modelenvironmental justiceNAAQSair qualitydecision-making |
| spellingShingle | Ciaran L Gallagher Tracey Holloway U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice Environmental Research Letters reduced-form model environmental justice NAAQS air quality decision-making |
| title | U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| title_full | U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| title_fullStr | U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| title_full_unstemmed | U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| title_short | U.S. decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| title_sort | u s decarbonization impacts on air quality and environmental justice |
| topic | reduced-form model environmental justice NAAQS air quality decision-making |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac99ef |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ciaranlgallagher usdecarbonizationimpactsonairqualityandenvironmentaljustice AT traceyholloway usdecarbonizationimpactsonairqualityandenvironmentaljustice |