A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients

BackgroundAccurate measurement of ventricular volumes is an important clinical imaging goal. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) is used increasingly as it is more available and less costly than cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). For the right ventricle (RV), the current practice is to acquir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Alessandra M. Ferraro, Kristin Bonello, Lynn A. Sleeper, Minmin Lu, Melinda Shea, Gerald R. Marx, Andrew J. Powell, Tal Geva, David M. Harrild
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1137814/full
_version_ 1797833097636478976
author Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Kristin Bonello
Kristin Bonello
Lynn A. Sleeper
Lynn A. Sleeper
Minmin Lu
Melinda Shea
Gerald R. Marx
Gerald R. Marx
Andrew J. Powell
Andrew J. Powell
Tal Geva
Tal Geva
David M. Harrild
David M. Harrild
author_facet Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Kristin Bonello
Kristin Bonello
Lynn A. Sleeper
Lynn A. Sleeper
Minmin Lu
Melinda Shea
Gerald R. Marx
Gerald R. Marx
Andrew J. Powell
Andrew J. Powell
Tal Geva
Tal Geva
David M. Harrild
David M. Harrild
author_sort Alessandra M. Ferraro
collection DOAJ
description BackgroundAccurate measurement of ventricular volumes is an important clinical imaging goal. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) is used increasingly as it is more available and less costly than cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). For the right ventricle (RV), the current practice is to acquire 3DEcho volumes from the apical view. However, in some patients the RV may be better seen from the subcostal view. Therefore, this study compared RV volume measurements from the apical vs. the subcostal view, using CMR as a reference standard.MethodsPatients <18 years old undergoing a clinical CMR examination were prospectively enrolled. 3DEcho was performed on the day of the CMR. 3DEcho images were acquired with Philips Epic 7 ultrasound system from apical and subcostal views. Offline analysis was performed with TomTec 4DRV Function for 3DEcho images and cvi42 for CMR ones. RV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume were collected. Agreement between 3DEcho and CMR was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Percentage (%) error was calculated using CMR as the reference standard.ResultsForty-seven patients were included in the analysis (age range 10 months to 16 years). The ICC was moderate to excellent for all volume comparisons to CMR (subcostal vs. CMR: end-diastolic volume 0.93, end-systolic volume 0.81; apical vs. CMR: end-diastolic volume 0.94, end-systolic volume 0.74).The 3DEcho mean % error vs. CMR for end-systolic volume was 25% for subcostal and 31% for apical; for end-diastolic volume it was 15% for subcostal and 16% for apical. The % error was not significantly different between apical vs. subcostal views for end-systolic and end-diastolic volume measurements.ConclusionsFor apical and subcostal views, 3DEcho-derived ventricular volumes agree well with CMR. Neither echo view has a consistently smaller error when compared to CMR volumes. Accordingly, the subcostal view can be used as an alternative to the apical view when acquiring 3DEcho volumes in pediatric patients, particularly when the image quality from this window is superior.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T14:18:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27b7fc1c1efc42229137f12a2e90de4e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2297-055X
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T14:18:13Z
publishDate 2023-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
spelling doaj.art-27b7fc1c1efc42229137f12a2e90de4e2023-05-05T05:23:07ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine2297-055X2023-05-011010.3389/fcvm.2023.11378141137814A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patientsAlessandra M. Ferraro0Alessandra M. Ferraro1Alessandra M. Ferraro2Kristin Bonello3Kristin Bonello4Lynn A. Sleeper5Lynn A. Sleeper6Minmin Lu7Melinda Shea8Gerald R. Marx9Gerald R. Marx10Andrew J. Powell11Andrew J. Powell12Tal Geva13Tal Geva14David M. Harrild15David M. Harrild16Department of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesPhD Program in Angio-Cardio-Thoracic Pathophysiology and Imaging, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, ItalyDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, United StatesDepartment of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United StatesBackgroundAccurate measurement of ventricular volumes is an important clinical imaging goal. Three-dimensional echocardiography (3DEcho) is used increasingly as it is more available and less costly than cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). For the right ventricle (RV), the current practice is to acquire 3DEcho volumes from the apical view. However, in some patients the RV may be better seen from the subcostal view. Therefore, this study compared RV volume measurements from the apical vs. the subcostal view, using CMR as a reference standard.MethodsPatients <18 years old undergoing a clinical CMR examination were prospectively enrolled. 3DEcho was performed on the day of the CMR. 3DEcho images were acquired with Philips Epic 7 ultrasound system from apical and subcostal views. Offline analysis was performed with TomTec 4DRV Function for 3DEcho images and cvi42 for CMR ones. RV end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume were collected. Agreement between 3DEcho and CMR was assessed with Bland-Altman analysis and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Percentage (%) error was calculated using CMR as the reference standard.ResultsForty-seven patients were included in the analysis (age range 10 months to 16 years). The ICC was moderate to excellent for all volume comparisons to CMR (subcostal vs. CMR: end-diastolic volume 0.93, end-systolic volume 0.81; apical vs. CMR: end-diastolic volume 0.94, end-systolic volume 0.74).The 3DEcho mean % error vs. CMR for end-systolic volume was 25% for subcostal and 31% for apical; for end-diastolic volume it was 15% for subcostal and 16% for apical. The % error was not significantly different between apical vs. subcostal views for end-systolic and end-diastolic volume measurements.ConclusionsFor apical and subcostal views, 3DEcho-derived ventricular volumes agree well with CMR. Neither echo view has a consistently smaller error when compared to CMR volumes. Accordingly, the subcostal view can be used as an alternative to the apical view when acquiring 3DEcho volumes in pediatric patients, particularly when the image quality from this window is superior.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1137814/fullthree-dimensional echocardiographyright ventricular volumescongenital heart diseasepediatricsapical viewsubcostal view
spellingShingle Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Alessandra M. Ferraro
Kristin Bonello
Kristin Bonello
Lynn A. Sleeper
Lynn A. Sleeper
Minmin Lu
Melinda Shea
Gerald R. Marx
Gerald R. Marx
Andrew J. Powell
Andrew J. Powell
Tal Geva
Tal Geva
David M. Harrild
David M. Harrild
A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
three-dimensional echocardiography
right ventricular volumes
congenital heart disease
pediatrics
apical view
subcostal view
title A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
title_full A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
title_fullStr A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
title_full_unstemmed A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
title_short A comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three-dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
title_sort comparison between the apical and subcostal view for three dimensional echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular volumes in pediatric patients
topic three-dimensional echocardiography
right ventricular volumes
congenital heart disease
pediatrics
apical view
subcostal view
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1137814/full
work_keys_str_mv AT alessandramferraro acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT alessandramferraro acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT alessandramferraro acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT kristinbonello acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT kristinbonello acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT lynnasleeper acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT lynnasleeper acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT minminlu acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT melindashea acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT geraldrmarx acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT geraldrmarx acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT andrewjpowell acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT andrewjpowell acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT talgeva acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT talgeva acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT davidmharrild acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT davidmharrild acomparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT alessandramferraro comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT alessandramferraro comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT alessandramferraro comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT kristinbonello comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT kristinbonello comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT lynnasleeper comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT lynnasleeper comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT minminlu comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT melindashea comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT geraldrmarx comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT geraldrmarx comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT andrewjpowell comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT andrewjpowell comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT talgeva comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT talgeva comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT davidmharrild comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients
AT davidmharrild comparisonbetweentheapicalandsubcostalviewforthreedimensionalechocardiographicassessmentofrightventricularvolumesinpediatricpatients