Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women

Abstract Background Non-mass enhancement (NME) is a diagnostic dilemma and highly reliant on the experience of the radiologists. Texture analysis (TA) could serve as an objective method to quantify lesion characteristics. However, it remains unclear what role TA plays in a predictive model based on...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yu Tan, Hui Mai, Zhiqing Huang, Li Zhang, Chengwei Li, Songxin Wu, Huang Huang, Wen Tang, Yongxi Liu, Kuiming Jiang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2021-03-01
Series:BMC Medical Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00571-x
_version_ 1818337185384890368
author Yu Tan
Hui Mai
Zhiqing Huang
Li Zhang
Chengwei Li
Songxin Wu
Huang Huang
Wen Tang
Yongxi Liu
Kuiming Jiang
author_facet Yu Tan
Hui Mai
Zhiqing Huang
Li Zhang
Chengwei Li
Songxin Wu
Huang Huang
Wen Tang
Yongxi Liu
Kuiming Jiang
author_sort Yu Tan
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Non-mass enhancement (NME) is a diagnostic dilemma and highly reliant on the experience of the radiologists. Texture analysis (TA) could serve as an objective method to quantify lesion characteristics. However, it remains unclear what role TA plays in a predictive model based on routine MRI characteristics. The purpose of this study was to explore the value of TA in distinguishing between benign and malignant NME in premenopausal women. Methods Women in whom NME was histologically proven (n = 147) were enrolled (benign: 58; malignant: 89) was retrospective. Then, 102 and 45 patients were classified as the training and validation groups, respectively. Scanning sequences included Fat-suppressed T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted which were acquired on a 1.5T MRI system. Clinical and routine MR characteristics (CRMC) were evaluated by two radiologists according to the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data system (2013). Texture features were extracted from all post-contrast sequences in the training group. The combination model was built and then assessed in the validation group. Pearson’s chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of CRMC, TA, and their combination model in NME diagnosis. Results The combination model showed superior diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME compared to that of CRMC or TA alone (AUC, 0.887 vs 0.832 vs 0.74). Moreover, compared to CRMC, the model showed high specificity (72.5% vs 80%). The results obtained in the validation group confirmed the model was promising. Conclusions With the combined use of TA and CRMC could afford an improved diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T14:51:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27de615ab56b401e9037f982abdc75ef
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1471-2342
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T14:51:12Z
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Imaging
spelling doaj.art-27de615ab56b401e9037f982abdc75ef2022-12-21T23:41:20ZengBMCBMC Medical Imaging1471-23422021-03-0121111010.1186/s12880-021-00571-xAdditive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal womenYu Tan0Hui Mai1Zhiqing Huang2Li Zhang3Chengwei Li4Songxin Wu5Huang Huang6Wen Tang7Yongxi Liu8Kuiming Jiang9Department of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical UniversityDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalDepartment of Radiology, Guangdong Women and Children HospitalAbstract Background Non-mass enhancement (NME) is a diagnostic dilemma and highly reliant on the experience of the radiologists. Texture analysis (TA) could serve as an objective method to quantify lesion characteristics. However, it remains unclear what role TA plays in a predictive model based on routine MRI characteristics. The purpose of this study was to explore the value of TA in distinguishing between benign and malignant NME in premenopausal women. Methods Women in whom NME was histologically proven (n = 147) were enrolled (benign: 58; malignant: 89) was retrospective. Then, 102 and 45 patients were classified as the training and validation groups, respectively. Scanning sequences included Fat-suppressed T2-weighted and fat-suppressed contrast-enhanced T1-weighted which were acquired on a 1.5T MRI system. Clinical and routine MR characteristics (CRMC) were evaluated by two radiologists according to the Breast Imaging and Reporting and Data system (2013). Texture features were extracted from all post-contrast sequences in the training group. The combination model was built and then assessed in the validation group. Pearson’s chi-square test and Mann–Whitney U test were used to compare categorical variables and continuous variables, respectively. Logistic regression analysis and receiver operating characteristic curve were employed to assess the diagnostic performance of CRMC, TA, and their combination model in NME diagnosis. Results The combination model showed superior diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME compared to that of CRMC or TA alone (AUC, 0.887 vs 0.832 vs 0.74). Moreover, compared to CRMC, the model showed high specificity (72.5% vs 80%). The results obtained in the validation group confirmed the model was promising. Conclusions With the combined use of TA and CRMC could afford an improved diagnostic performance in differentiating between benign and malignant NME.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00571-xBreastMRINon-mass enhancementTexture analysisAdditive value
spellingShingle Yu Tan
Hui Mai
Zhiqing Huang
Li Zhang
Chengwei Li
Songxin Wu
Huang Huang
Wen Tang
Yongxi Liu
Kuiming Jiang
Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
BMC Medical Imaging
Breast
MRI
Non-mass enhancement
Texture analysis
Additive value
title Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
title_full Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
title_fullStr Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
title_short Additive value of texture analysis based on breast MRI for distinguishing between benign and malignant non-mass enhancement in premenopausal women
title_sort additive value of texture analysis based on breast mri for distinguishing between benign and malignant non mass enhancement in premenopausal women
topic Breast
MRI
Non-mass enhancement
Texture analysis
Additive value
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-021-00571-x
work_keys_str_mv AT yutan additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT huimai additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT zhiqinghuang additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT lizhang additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT chengweili additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT songxinwu additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT huanghuang additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT wentang additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT yongxiliu additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen
AT kuimingjiang additivevalueoftextureanalysisbasedonbreastmrifordistinguishingbetweenbenignandmalignantnonmassenhancementinpremenopausalwomen