The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries

Summary: Background: Coverage levels for essential interventions aimed at reducing deaths of mothers and children are increasing steadily in most low-income and middle-income countries. We assessed how much poor and rural populations in these countries are benefiting from national-level progress. M...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Cesar G Victora, ProfMD, Aluisio J D Barros, ProfMD, Giovanny V A França, PhD, Inácio C M da Silva, PhD, Liliana Carvajal-Velez, MSc, Agbessi Amouzou, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-04-01
Series:The Lancet Global Health
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X17300773
_version_ 1819206227073171456
author Cesar G Victora, ProfMD
Aluisio J D Barros, ProfMD
Giovanny V A França, PhD
Inácio C M da Silva, PhD
Liliana Carvajal-Velez, MSc
Agbessi Amouzou, PhD
author_facet Cesar G Victora, ProfMD
Aluisio J D Barros, ProfMD
Giovanny V A França, PhD
Inácio C M da Silva, PhD
Liliana Carvajal-Velez, MSc
Agbessi Amouzou, PhD
author_sort Cesar G Victora, ProfMD
collection DOAJ
description Summary: Background: Coverage levels for essential interventions aimed at reducing deaths of mothers and children are increasing steadily in most low-income and middle-income countries. We assessed how much poor and rural populations in these countries are benefiting from national-level progress. Methods: We analysed trends in a composite coverage indicator (CCI) based on eight reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in 209 national surveys in 64 countries, from Jan 1, 1994, to Dec 31, 2014. Trends by wealth quintile and urban or rural residence were fitted with multilevel modelling. We used an approach akin to the calculation of population attributable risk to quantify the contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends. Findings: From 1994 to 2014, the CCI increased by 0·82 percent points a year across all countries; households in the two poorest quintiles had an increase of 0·99 percent points a year, which was faster than that for the three wealthiest quintiles (0·68 percent points). Gains among poor populations were faster in lower-middle-income and upper-middle-income countries than in low-income countries. Globally, national level increases in CCI were 17·5% faster than they would have been without the contribution of the two poorest quintiles. Coverage increased more rapidly annually in rural (0·93 percent points) than urban (0·52 percent points) areas. Interpretation: National coverage gains were accelerated by important increases among poor and rural mothers and children. Despite progress, important inequalities persist, and need to be addressed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Funding: UNICEF, Wellcome Trust.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T05:04:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27e18a28406a4fdea44dac82ff035a93
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2214-109X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T05:04:14Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series The Lancet Global Health
spelling doaj.art-27e18a28406a4fdea44dac82ff035a932022-12-21T17:59:08ZengElsevierThe Lancet Global Health2214-109X2017-04-0154e402e407The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countriesCesar G Victora, ProfMD0Aluisio J D Barros, ProfMD1Giovanny V A França, PhD2Inácio C M da Silva, PhD3Liliana Carvajal-Velez, MSc4Agbessi Amouzou, PhD5International Center for Equity in Health, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil; Correspondence to: Prof Cesar G Victora, Rua Marechal Deodoro 1160, Pelotas, RS, 96020-220, BrazilInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, BrazilInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, BrazilInternational Center for Equity in Health, Post-Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas, BrazilData and Analytics Unit, UNICEF, New York, NY, USAData and Analytics Unit, UNICEF, New York, NY, USASummary: Background: Coverage levels for essential interventions aimed at reducing deaths of mothers and children are increasing steadily in most low-income and middle-income countries. We assessed how much poor and rural populations in these countries are benefiting from national-level progress. Methods: We analysed trends in a composite coverage indicator (CCI) based on eight reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health interventions in 209 national surveys in 64 countries, from Jan 1, 1994, to Dec 31, 2014. Trends by wealth quintile and urban or rural residence were fitted with multilevel modelling. We used an approach akin to the calculation of population attributable risk to quantify the contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends. Findings: From 1994 to 2014, the CCI increased by 0·82 percent points a year across all countries; households in the two poorest quintiles had an increase of 0·99 percent points a year, which was faster than that for the three wealthiest quintiles (0·68 percent points). Gains among poor populations were faster in lower-middle-income and upper-middle-income countries than in low-income countries. Globally, national level increases in CCI were 17·5% faster than they would have been without the contribution of the two poorest quintiles. Coverage increased more rapidly annually in rural (0·93 percent points) than urban (0·52 percent points) areas. Interpretation: National coverage gains were accelerated by important increases among poor and rural mothers and children. Despite progress, important inequalities persist, and need to be addressed to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. Funding: UNICEF, Wellcome Trust.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X17300773
spellingShingle Cesar G Victora, ProfMD
Aluisio J D Barros, ProfMD
Giovanny V A França, PhD
Inácio C M da Silva, PhD
Liliana Carvajal-Velez, MSc
Agbessi Amouzou, PhD
The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
The Lancet Global Health
title The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
title_full The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
title_fullStr The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
title_full_unstemmed The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
title_short The contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive, maternal, newborn, and child health coverage: analyses of cross-sectional surveys from 64 countries
title_sort contribution of poor and rural populations to national trends in reproductive maternal newborn and child health coverage analyses of cross sectional surveys from 64 countries
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214109X17300773
work_keys_str_mv AT cesargvictoraprofmd thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT aluisiojdbarrosprofmd thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT giovannyvafrancaphd thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT inaciocmdasilvaphd thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT lilianacarvajalvelezmsc thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT agbessiamouzouphd thecontributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT cesargvictoraprofmd contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT aluisiojdbarrosprofmd contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT giovannyvafrancaphd contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT inaciocmdasilvaphd contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT lilianacarvajalvelezmsc contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries
AT agbessiamouzouphd contributionofpoorandruralpopulationstonationaltrendsinreproductivematernalnewbornandchildhealthcoverageanalysesofcrosssectionalsurveysfrom64countries