Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi
This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated princip...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
2022-03-01
|
| Series: | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1805 |
| _version_ | 1797900834583871488 |
|---|---|
| author | Bagus Surya Prabowo |
| author_facet | Bagus Surya Prabowo |
| author_sort | Bagus Surya Prabowo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated principles. The study results show that the Constitutional Court often uses judicial activism as in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court Number 5/PUU-V/2007 and Number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Based on the two decisions, there are at least three considerations of the Constitutional Court in implementing judicial activism that has been fulfilled in cases of presidential threshold, namely, 1) political discrimination, 2) violations of constitutional rights, and 3) a socio-political emergency occurs. Therefore, the Constitutional Court has a basis for testing the threshold that violates morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. Thus, the Constitutional Court should use judicial activism to give appreciation for substantial justice to revive the value of expediency and justice in society.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:05Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-27ebb734386242c3a6ce6e8057548830 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1829-7706 2548-1657 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T08:52:05Z |
| publishDate | 2022-03-01 |
| publisher | The Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Jurnal Konstitusi |
| spelling | doaj.art-27ebb734386242c3a6ce6e80575488302023-02-22T04:09:39ZengThe Registrar and Secretariat General of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of IndonesiaJurnal Konstitusi1829-77062548-16572022-03-0119110.31078/jk1914575Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah KonstitusiBagus Surya Prabowo0Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah This study aims to explain the application of judicial activism carried out by the Constitutional Court and the reasons for the need for the Constitutional Court to apply judicial activism in the presidential threshold decision through normative juridical research by explaining interrelated principles. The study results show that the Constitutional Court often uses judicial activism as in the Decisions of the Constitutional Court Number 5/PUU-V/2007 and Number 102/PUU-VII/2009. Based on the two decisions, there are at least three considerations of the Constitutional Court in implementing judicial activism that has been fulfilled in cases of presidential threshold, namely, 1) political discrimination, 2) violations of constitutional rights, and 3) a socio-political emergency occurs. Therefore, the Constitutional Court has a basis for testing the threshold that violates morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice. Thus, the Constitutional Court should use judicial activism to give appreciation for substantial justice to revive the value of expediency and justice in society. https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1805Judicial ActivismKeadilan SubstantifKegaduhan PolitikPresidential ThresholdPutusan Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| spellingShingle | Bagus Surya Prabowo Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi Jurnal Konstitusi Judicial Activism Keadilan Substantif Kegaduhan Politik Presidential Threshold Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title | Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_full | Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_fullStr | Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_full_unstemmed | Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_short | Menggagas Judicial Activism dalam Putusan Presidential Threshold di Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| title_sort | menggagas judicial activism dalam putusan presidential threshold di mahkamah konstitusi |
| topic | Judicial Activism Keadilan Substantif Kegaduhan Politik Presidential Threshold Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi |
| url | https://jurnalkonstitusi.mkri.id/index.php/jk/article/view/1805 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT bagussuryaprabowo menggagasjudicialactivismdalamputusanpresidentialthresholddimahkamahkonstitusi |