Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract

Background: Ventricular pacing is detrimental to cardiac function, with more deleterious effects when it is apical, widening the QRS complex, so the best cardiac pacing site is still being sought. Objective: To compare, by electrocardiographic measurements, the duration of QRS complexes at different...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Roberto Carlos Alvarez Coello, Diego Patricio Serrano Piedra
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Linceu Editorial 2020-01-01
Series:Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jca.org.br/jca/article/view/3300
_version_ 1818510792234893312
author Roberto Carlos Alvarez Coello
Diego Patricio Serrano Piedra
author_facet Roberto Carlos Alvarez Coello
Diego Patricio Serrano Piedra
author_sort Roberto Carlos Alvarez Coello
collection DOAJ
description Background: Ventricular pacing is detrimental to cardiac function, with more deleterious effects when it is apical, widening the QRS complex, so the best cardiac pacing site is still being sought. Objective: To compare, by electrocardiographic measurements, the duration of QRS complexes at different cardiac stimulation sites, from the medical records of patients with pacemakers, who attended the external cardiac stimulation consultation at Monte Sinai Hospital in Cuenca-Ecuador. Methods: A total of 323 patients were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to November 2018, classifying them by electrocardiographic morphology as apical, low septal, middle septal and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stimulation. The duration of stimulated QRS complexes was quantified using digital software that allows such measurement and stores all records. Subsequently, the comparison of the means of the different stimulation sites was performed using ANOVA. Results: The average age was 73.6 years; 56.03% corresponded to males; 49.84% had apical stimulation, 21.67% middle septal, 15.78% RVOT, 12.69% low septal. At the end of the QRS complex measurements, an average on apex of 179.94 ms, on low septum of 172.56 ms, an average on middle septum of 153.89 ms and on RVOT 171.66 ms were obtained. When comparing these values with the average ANOVA, the duration of the QRS stimulated in the middle septum was shorter than the other sites, being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cardiac pacing in the middle septum is a viable alternative, which results in shorter QRS complex duration, therefore, better synchronization of myocardial contraction, also avoiding the deleterious effects of apical stimulation.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T23:24:54Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27efdd40b38a468785714e80e8e34aa2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2674-7472
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T23:24:54Z
publishDate 2020-01-01
publisher Linceu Editorial
record_format Article
series Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
spelling doaj.art-27efdd40b38a468785714e80e8e34aa22022-12-22T01:29:36ZengLinceu EditorialJournal of Cardiac Arrhythmias2674-74722020-01-01323Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow TractRoberto Carlos Alvarez CoelloDiego Patricio Serrano PiedraBackground: Ventricular pacing is detrimental to cardiac function, with more deleterious effects when it is apical, widening the QRS complex, so the best cardiac pacing site is still being sought. Objective: To compare, by electrocardiographic measurements, the duration of QRS complexes at different cardiac stimulation sites, from the medical records of patients with pacemakers, who attended the external cardiac stimulation consultation at Monte Sinai Hospital in Cuenca-Ecuador. Methods: A total of 323 patients were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to November 2018, classifying them by electrocardiographic morphology as apical, low septal, middle septal and right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) stimulation. The duration of stimulated QRS complexes was quantified using digital software that allows such measurement and stores all records. Subsequently, the comparison of the means of the different stimulation sites was performed using ANOVA. Results: The average age was 73.6 years; 56.03% corresponded to males; 49.84% had apical stimulation, 21.67% middle septal, 15.78% RVOT, 12.69% low septal. At the end of the QRS complex measurements, an average on apex of 179.94 ms, on low septum of 172.56 ms, an average on middle septum of 153.89 ms and on RVOT 171.66 ms were obtained. When comparing these values with the average ANOVA, the duration of the QRS stimulated in the middle septum was shorter than the other sites, being statistically significant (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Cardiac pacing in the middle septum is a viable alternative, which results in shorter QRS complex duration, therefore, better synchronization of myocardial contraction, also avoiding the deleterious effects of apical stimulation. https://www.jca.org.br/jca/article/view/3300Artificial cardiac stimulationElectrocardiographyAnalysis of variance
spellingShingle Roberto Carlos Alvarez Coello
Diego Patricio Serrano Piedra
Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
Journal of Cardiac Arrhythmias
Artificial cardiac stimulation
Electrocardiography
Analysis of variance
title Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
title_full Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
title_fullStr Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
title_full_unstemmed Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
title_short Electrocardiographic Comparison Between Artificial Cardiac Stimulation of Apex, Septum and Right Ventricular Outflow Tract
title_sort electrocardiographic comparison between artificial cardiac stimulation of apex septum and right ventricular outflow tract
topic Artificial cardiac stimulation
Electrocardiography
Analysis of variance
url https://www.jca.org.br/jca/article/view/3300
work_keys_str_mv AT robertocarlosalvarezcoello electrocardiographiccomparisonbetweenartificialcardiacstimulationofapexseptumandrightventricularoutflowtract
AT diegopatricioserranopiedra electrocardiographiccomparisonbetweenartificialcardiacstimulationofapexseptumandrightventricularoutflowtract