Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Conventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Lin-lin Zhu, Jian-ying Zhou, Ling Luo, Xiang Wang, Jia-xi Peng, Sha-sha Chen, Hai-Yan Yin, Qiao-Feng Wu, Cheng-shun Zhang, Peng Lv, Yong Tang, Shu-guang Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2017-04-01
Series:Trials
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2
_version_ 1811284224673579008
author Lin-lin Zhu
Jian-ying Zhou
Ling Luo
Xiang Wang
Jia-xi Peng
Sha-sha Chen
Hai-Yan Yin
Qiao-Feng Wu
Cheng-shun Zhang
Peng Lv
Yong Tang
Shu-guang Yu
author_facet Lin-lin Zhu
Jian-ying Zhou
Ling Luo
Xiang Wang
Jia-xi Peng
Sha-sha Chen
Hai-Yan Yin
Qiao-Feng Wu
Cheng-shun Zhang
Peng Lv
Yong Tang
Shu-guang Yu
author_sort Lin-lin Zhu
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Conventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous clinical trials and systematic reviews. Given that increasing concerns on the safety of generated smoke from conventional moxibustion have received much attention, smoke-free moxibustion is regarded as a potential alternative. However, whether smoke-free moxibustion would display a similar efficacy to that of conventional moxibustion still remains unclear. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial attempts to investigate the difference of efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion in patients with KOA. Methods/design This is a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 138 eligible participants with KOA will be randomly allocated to two groups (conventional moxibustion group and smoke-free moxibustion group) in seven hospitals in China. Participants will receive 12 sessions of moxibustion treatment at three acupoints (EX-LE4, ST35, and ST36) over a period of 4 weeks (3 sessions per week). A smoke-removing device is placed at the top of the moxibustion device for the smoke-free moxibustion group (n = 69), while the conventional moxibustion group (n = 69) is treated with traditional moxibustion. The primary outcome measure will be the change of the global scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from the baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the visual analog scale VASand Patient Global Assessment scores. Follow-up measurements will be performed on the 8th and 12th weeks after random allocation. Discussion This study will contribute to providing a solid foundation for the selection of moxibustion in clinical application as well as future research in moxibustion therapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02772055 . Registered on 12 May 2016.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T02:25:28Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27f800c2e016468abac7d832717392b1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1745-6215
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T02:25:28Z
publishDate 2017-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Trials
spelling doaj.art-27f800c2e016468abac7d832717392b12022-12-22T03:06:47ZengBMCTrials1745-62152017-04-011811810.1186/s13063-017-1846-2Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trialLin-lin Zhu0Jian-ying Zhou1Ling Luo2Xiang Wang3Jia-xi Peng4Sha-sha Chen5Hai-Yan Yin6Qiao-Feng Wu7Cheng-shun Zhang8Peng Lv9Yong Tang10Shu-guang Yu11Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduChengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine ChengduAbstract Background Conventional moxibustion is a representative non-drug intervention in traditional Chinese medicine, and it has been reported to produce encouraging results and benefits in relieving symptoms and improving the quality of life for patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) in previous clinical trials and systematic reviews. Given that increasing concerns on the safety of generated smoke from conventional moxibustion have received much attention, smoke-free moxibustion is regarded as a potential alternative. However, whether smoke-free moxibustion would display a similar efficacy to that of conventional moxibustion still remains unclear. Therefore, this randomized controlled trial attempts to investigate the difference of efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion in patients with KOA. Methods/design This is a multicenter, randomized, single-blinded, parallel-group clinical trial. A total of 138 eligible participants with KOA will be randomly allocated to two groups (conventional moxibustion group and smoke-free moxibustion group) in seven hospitals in China. Participants will receive 12 sessions of moxibustion treatment at three acupoints (EX-LE4, ST35, and ST36) over a period of 4 weeks (3 sessions per week). A smoke-removing device is placed at the top of the moxibustion device for the smoke-free moxibustion group (n = 69), while the conventional moxibustion group (n = 69) is treated with traditional moxibustion. The primary outcome measure will be the change of the global scale of the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) from the baseline to 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes include the visual analog scale VASand Patient Global Assessment scores. Follow-up measurements will be performed on the 8th and 12th weeks after random allocation. Discussion This study will contribute to providing a solid foundation for the selection of moxibustion in clinical application as well as future research in moxibustion therapy. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02772055 . Registered on 12 May 2016.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2Moxa smokeMoxibustionKnee osteoarthritisRandomized controlled trialProtocol
spellingShingle Lin-lin Zhu
Jian-ying Zhou
Ling Luo
Xiang Wang
Jia-xi Peng
Sha-sha Chen
Hai-Yan Yin
Qiao-Feng Wu
Cheng-shun Zhang
Peng Lv
Yong Tang
Shu-guang Yu
Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
Trials
Moxa smoke
Moxibustion
Knee osteoarthritis
Randomized controlled trial
Protocol
title Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke-free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison of the efficacy between conventional moxibustion and smoke free moxibustion on knee osteoarthritis study protocol of a randomized controlled trial
topic Moxa smoke
Moxibustion
Knee osteoarthritis
Randomized controlled trial
Protocol
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13063-017-1846-2
work_keys_str_mv AT linlinzhu comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jianyingzhou comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT lingluo comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT xiangwang comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jiaxipeng comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shashachen comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT haiyanyin comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT qiaofengwu comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chengshunzhang comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT penglv comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yongtang comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT shuguangyu comparisonoftheefficacybetweenconventionalmoxibustionandsmokefreemoxibustiononkneeosteoarthritisstudyprotocolofarandomizedcontrolledtrial