Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review

Pythium insidiosum, an oomycete, is frequently referred to as a “parafungus” due to its striking similarity to fungal keratitis. Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant rise in Pythium insidiosum keratitis (PIK) cases, notably in Asia and India. This trend is potentially attributable to...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Bharat Gurnani, Kirandeep Kaur, Sameer Chaudhary, Meena Lakshmipathy, Hirika Gosalia, Shreya Jain, Harinikrishna Balakrishnan, Apurva H Nagtode, Saloni M Joshi, Lakshana Malla Lokanathan, Ajeeth Samuel, Ashima Varshney
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2023-01-01
Series:TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.tnoajosr.com/article.asp?issn=2589-4528;year=2023;volume=61;issue=4;spage=408;epage=426;aulast=Gurnani
_version_ 1797226139654029312
author Bharat Gurnani
Kirandeep Kaur
Sameer Chaudhary
Meena Lakshmipathy
Hirika Gosalia
Shreya Jain
Harinikrishna Balakrishnan
Apurva H Nagtode
Saloni M Joshi
Lakshana Malla Lokanathan
Ajeeth Samuel
Ashima Varshney
author_facet Bharat Gurnani
Kirandeep Kaur
Sameer Chaudhary
Meena Lakshmipathy
Hirika Gosalia
Shreya Jain
Harinikrishna Balakrishnan
Apurva H Nagtode
Saloni M Joshi
Lakshana Malla Lokanathan
Ajeeth Samuel
Ashima Varshney
author_sort Bharat Gurnani
collection DOAJ
description Pythium insidiosum, an oomycete, is frequently referred to as a “parafungus” due to its striking similarity to fungal keratitis. Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant rise in Pythium insidiosum keratitis (PIK) cases, notably in Asia and India. This trend is potentially attributable to heightened research interest in this microorganism and advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Clinically, its features, such as subepithelial infiltration, fluffy stromal infiltrates resembling cotton wool, satellite lesions, corneal perforation, endoexudates, and anterior chamber hypopyon, mirror those of fungal infections. However, hallmark clinical features like reticular dots, tentacular extensions, peripheral indentation, and prompt limbal progression distinguish Pythium from other pathogens and necessitate vigilant clinical scrutiny. From a morphological and microbiological perspective, Pythium closely mirrors fungi when subjected to routine smear tests, often revealing perpendicular or obtuse septate or non-septate branching hyphae. Culturing on nutritional media like blood agar, chocolate agar, and so on remains the diagnostic gold standard, with the organism presenting as cream-white colonies that form zoospores. This can be further verified through the leaf incarnation technique. Culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the gold standard diagnostic modalities for PIK. Historically, due to constraints in diagnostic techniques and the slow growth of cultures, there has been a trend toward employing advanced molecular diagnostic tools, including PCR, confocal microscopy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunodiffusion. When corneal scraping tests (10% KOH, Gram stain) depict fungal-like hyphae, antifungal treatments are often initiated even before culture results are ready. However, recent molecular research recommends the use of antibacterials, specifically 0.2% linezolid and 1% azithromycin, as the primary therapeutic agents. In cases that do not respond to treatment, early therapeutic keratoplasty is advised. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, laboratory and molecular diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic approaches for PIK.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T14:20:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-27f964451d4b4560bf26aa7a40149ce4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2589-4528
2589-4536
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T14:20:10Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research
spelling doaj.art-27f964451d4b4560bf26aa7a40149ce42024-04-03T06:45:43ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsTNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research2589-45282589-45362023-01-0161440842610.4103/tjosr.tjosr_97_23Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative reviewBharat GurnaniKirandeep KaurSameer ChaudharyMeena LakshmipathyHirika GosaliaShreya JainHarinikrishna BalakrishnanApurva H NagtodeSaloni M JoshiLakshana Malla LokanathanAjeeth SamuelAshima VarshneyPythium insidiosum, an oomycete, is frequently referred to as a “parafungus” due to its striking similarity to fungal keratitis. Over the past 10 years, there has been a significant rise in Pythium insidiosum keratitis (PIK) cases, notably in Asia and India. This trend is potentially attributable to heightened research interest in this microorganism and advancements in diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Clinically, its features, such as subepithelial infiltration, fluffy stromal infiltrates resembling cotton wool, satellite lesions, corneal perforation, endoexudates, and anterior chamber hypopyon, mirror those of fungal infections. However, hallmark clinical features like reticular dots, tentacular extensions, peripheral indentation, and prompt limbal progression distinguish Pythium from other pathogens and necessitate vigilant clinical scrutiny. From a morphological and microbiological perspective, Pythium closely mirrors fungi when subjected to routine smear tests, often revealing perpendicular or obtuse septate or non-septate branching hyphae. Culturing on nutritional media like blood agar, chocolate agar, and so on remains the diagnostic gold standard, with the organism presenting as cream-white colonies that form zoospores. This can be further verified through the leaf incarnation technique. Culture and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) are the gold standard diagnostic modalities for PIK. Historically, due to constraints in diagnostic techniques and the slow growth of cultures, there has been a trend toward employing advanced molecular diagnostic tools, including PCR, confocal microscopy, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, and immunodiffusion. When corneal scraping tests (10% KOH, Gram stain) depict fungal-like hyphae, antifungal treatments are often initiated even before culture results are ready. However, recent molecular research recommends the use of antibacterials, specifically 0.2% linezolid and 1% azithromycin, as the primary therapeutic agents. In cases that do not respond to treatment, early therapeutic keratoplasty is advised. This narrative review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, laboratory and molecular diagnostic procedures, and therapeutic approaches for PIK.http://www.tnoajosr.com/article.asp?issn=2589-4528;year=2023;volume=61;issue=4;spage=408;epage=426;aulast=Gurnanifurrowingpythium insidiosumpythium keratitistentacleszoospore
spellingShingle Bharat Gurnani
Kirandeep Kaur
Sameer Chaudhary
Meena Lakshmipathy
Hirika Gosalia
Shreya Jain
Harinikrishna Balakrishnan
Apurva H Nagtode
Saloni M Joshi
Lakshana Malla Lokanathan
Ajeeth Samuel
Ashima Varshney
Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
TNOA Journal of Ophthalmic Science and Research
furrowing
pythium insidiosum
pythium keratitis
tentacles
zoospore
title Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
title_full Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
title_fullStr Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
title_full_unstemmed Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
title_short Decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis – A narrative review
title_sort decoding the rare diagnostic enigma of pythium insidiosum keratitis a narrative review
topic furrowing
pythium insidiosum
pythium keratitis
tentacles
zoospore
url http://www.tnoajosr.com/article.asp?issn=2589-4528;year=2023;volume=61;issue=4;spage=408;epage=426;aulast=Gurnani
work_keys_str_mv AT bharatgurnani decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT kirandeepkaur decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT sameerchaudhary decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT meenalakshmipathy decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT hirikagosalia decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT shreyajain decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT harinikrishnabalakrishnan decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT apurvahnagtode decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT salonimjoshi decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT lakshanamallalokanathan decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT ajeethsamuel decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview
AT ashimavarshney decodingtherarediagnosticenigmaofpythiuminsidiosumkeratitisanarrativereview