Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex.
Cryptic diversity within bumblebees (Bombus) has the potential to undermine crucial conservation efforts designed to reverse the observed decline in many bumblebee species worldwide. Central to such efforts is the ability to correctly recognise and diagnose species. The B. lucorum complex (Bombus lu...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2012-01-01
|
Series: | PLoS ONE |
Online Access: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22238595/pdf/?tool=EBI |
_version_ | 1818401176516820992 |
---|---|
author | James C Carolan Tomás E Murray Úna Fitzpatrick John Crossley Hans Schmidt Björn Cederberg Luke McNally Robert J Paxton Paul H Williams Mark J F Brown |
author_facet | James C Carolan Tomás E Murray Úna Fitzpatrick John Crossley Hans Schmidt Björn Cederberg Luke McNally Robert J Paxton Paul H Williams Mark J F Brown |
author_sort | James C Carolan |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Cryptic diversity within bumblebees (Bombus) has the potential to undermine crucial conservation efforts designed to reverse the observed decline in many bumblebee species worldwide. Central to such efforts is the ability to correctly recognise and diagnose species. The B. lucorum complex (Bombus lucorum, B. cryptarum and B. magnus) comprises one of the most abundant and important group of wild plant and crop pollinators in northern Europe. Although the workers of these species are notoriously difficult to diagnose morphologically, it has been claimed that queens are readily diagnosable from morphological characters. Here we assess the value of colour-pattern characters in species identification of DNA-barcoded queens from the B. lucorum complex. Three distinct molecular operational taxonomic units were identified each representing one species. However, no uniquely diagnostic colour-pattern character state was found for any of these three molecular units and most colour-pattern characters showed continuous variation among the units. All characters previously deemed to be unique and diagnostic for one species were displayed by specimens molecularly identified as a different species. These results presented here raise questions on the reliability of species determinations in previous studies and highlights the benefits of implementing DNA barcoding prior to ecological, taxonomic and conservation studies of these important key pollinators. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-14T07:48:18Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2801a2cff9ec4e0ebb26dcb5bc342def |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1932-6203 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-14T07:48:18Z |
publishDate | 2012-01-01 |
publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
record_format | Article |
series | PLoS ONE |
spelling | doaj.art-2801a2cff9ec4e0ebb26dcb5bc342def2022-12-21T23:10:48ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032012-01-0171e2925110.1371/journal.pone.0029251Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex.James C CarolanTomás E MurrayÚna FitzpatrickJohn CrossleyHans SchmidtBjörn CederbergLuke McNallyRobert J PaxtonPaul H WilliamsMark J F BrownCryptic diversity within bumblebees (Bombus) has the potential to undermine crucial conservation efforts designed to reverse the observed decline in many bumblebee species worldwide. Central to such efforts is the ability to correctly recognise and diagnose species. The B. lucorum complex (Bombus lucorum, B. cryptarum and B. magnus) comprises one of the most abundant and important group of wild plant and crop pollinators in northern Europe. Although the workers of these species are notoriously difficult to diagnose morphologically, it has been claimed that queens are readily diagnosable from morphological characters. Here we assess the value of colour-pattern characters in species identification of DNA-barcoded queens from the B. lucorum complex. Three distinct molecular operational taxonomic units were identified each representing one species. However, no uniquely diagnostic colour-pattern character state was found for any of these three molecular units and most colour-pattern characters showed continuous variation among the units. All characters previously deemed to be unique and diagnostic for one species were displayed by specimens molecularly identified as a different species. These results presented here raise questions on the reliability of species determinations in previous studies and highlights the benefits of implementing DNA barcoding prior to ecological, taxonomic and conservation studies of these important key pollinators.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22238595/pdf/?tool=EBI |
spellingShingle | James C Carolan Tomás E Murray Úna Fitzpatrick John Crossley Hans Schmidt Björn Cederberg Luke McNally Robert J Paxton Paul H Williams Mark J F Brown Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. PLoS ONE |
title | Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. |
title_full | Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. |
title_fullStr | Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. |
title_full_unstemmed | Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. |
title_short | Colour patterns do not diagnose species: quantitative evaluation of a DNA barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex. |
title_sort | colour patterns do not diagnose species quantitative evaluation of a dna barcoded cryptic bumblebee complex |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmid/22238595/pdf/?tool=EBI |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jamesccarolan colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT tomasemurray colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT unafitzpatrick colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT johncrossley colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT hansschmidt colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT bjorncederberg colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT lukemcnally colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT robertjpaxton colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT paulhwilliams colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex AT markjfbrown colourpatternsdonotdiagnosespeciesquantitativeevaluationofadnabarcodedcrypticbumblebeecomplex |