Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment

Evapotranspiration (ET) is the main link between the natural water cycle and the land surface energy budget. Therefore water-balance and energy-balance approaches are two of the main methodologies for modelling this process. The water-balance approach is usually implemented as a complex, distributed...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Guzinski, H. Nieto, S. Stisen, R. Fensholt
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2015-04-01
Series:Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
Online Access:http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/2017/2015/hess-19-2017-2015.pdf
_version_ 1818367692248186880
author R. Guzinski
H. Nieto
S. Stisen
R. Fensholt
author_facet R. Guzinski
H. Nieto
S. Stisen
R. Fensholt
author_sort R. Guzinski
collection DOAJ
description Evapotranspiration (ET) is the main link between the natural water cycle and the land surface energy budget. Therefore water-balance and energy-balance approaches are two of the main methodologies for modelling this process. The water-balance approach is usually implemented as a complex, distributed hydrological model, while the energy-balance approach is often used with remotely sensed observations of, for example, the land surface temperature (LST) and the state of the vegetation. In this study we compare the catchment-scale output of two remote sensing models based on the two-source energy-balance (TSEB) scheme, against a hydrological model, MIKE SHE, calibrated over the Skjern river catchment in western Denmark. The three models utilize different primary inputs to estimate ET (LST from different satellites in the case of remote sensing models and modelled soil moisture and heat flux in the case of the MIKE SHE ET module). However, all three of them use the same ancillary data (meteorological measurements, land cover type and leaf area index, etc.) and produce output at similar spatial resolution (1 km for the TSEB models, 500 m for MIKE SHE). The comparison is performed on the spatial patterns of the fluxes present within the catchment area as well as on temporal patterns on the whole catchment scale in 8-year long time series. The results show that the spatial patterns of latent heat flux produced by the remote sensing models are more similar to each other than to the fluxes produced by MIKE SHE. The temporal patterns produced by the remote sensing and hydrological models are quite highly correlated (<i>r</i> &approx; 0.8). This indicates potential benefits to the hydrological modelling community of integrating spatial information derived through remote sensing methodology (contained in the ET maps derived with the energy-balance models, satellite based LST or another source) into the hydrological models. How this could be achieved and how to evaluate the improvements, or lack of thereof, is still an open research question.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T22:56:05Z
format Article
id doaj.art-280299d4cf0d44349cd29da1265d8c2f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1027-5606
1607-7938
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T22:56:05Z
publishDate 2015-04-01
publisher Copernicus Publications
record_format Article
series Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
spelling doaj.art-280299d4cf0d44349cd29da1265d8c2f2022-12-21T23:28:30ZengCopernicus PublicationsHydrology and Earth System Sciences1027-56061607-79382015-04-011942017203610.5194/hess-19-2017-2015Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchmentR. Guzinski0H. Nieto1S. Stisen2R. Fensholt3Department of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkGeological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Geosciences and Natural Resource Management, University of Copenhagen, Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkEvapotranspiration (ET) is the main link between the natural water cycle and the land surface energy budget. Therefore water-balance and energy-balance approaches are two of the main methodologies for modelling this process. The water-balance approach is usually implemented as a complex, distributed hydrological model, while the energy-balance approach is often used with remotely sensed observations of, for example, the land surface temperature (LST) and the state of the vegetation. In this study we compare the catchment-scale output of two remote sensing models based on the two-source energy-balance (TSEB) scheme, against a hydrological model, MIKE SHE, calibrated over the Skjern river catchment in western Denmark. The three models utilize different primary inputs to estimate ET (LST from different satellites in the case of remote sensing models and modelled soil moisture and heat flux in the case of the MIKE SHE ET module). However, all three of them use the same ancillary data (meteorological measurements, land cover type and leaf area index, etc.) and produce output at similar spatial resolution (1 km for the TSEB models, 500 m for MIKE SHE). The comparison is performed on the spatial patterns of the fluxes present within the catchment area as well as on temporal patterns on the whole catchment scale in 8-year long time series. The results show that the spatial patterns of latent heat flux produced by the remote sensing models are more similar to each other than to the fluxes produced by MIKE SHE. The temporal patterns produced by the remote sensing and hydrological models are quite highly correlated (<i>r</i> &approx; 0.8). This indicates potential benefits to the hydrological modelling community of integrating spatial information derived through remote sensing methodology (contained in the ET maps derived with the energy-balance models, satellite based LST or another source) into the hydrological models. How this could be achieved and how to evaluate the improvements, or lack of thereof, is still an open research question.http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/2017/2015/hess-19-2017-2015.pdf
spellingShingle R. Guzinski
H. Nieto
S. Stisen
R. Fensholt
Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
title Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
title_full Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
title_fullStr Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
title_full_unstemmed Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
title_short Inter-comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
title_sort inter comparison of energy balance and hydrological models for land surface energy flux estimation over a whole river catchment
url http://www.hydrol-earth-syst-sci.net/19/2017/2015/hess-19-2017-2015.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT rguzinski intercomparisonofenergybalanceandhydrologicalmodelsforlandsurfaceenergyfluxestimationoverawholerivercatchment
AT hnieto intercomparisonofenergybalanceandhydrologicalmodelsforlandsurfaceenergyfluxestimationoverawholerivercatchment
AT sstisen intercomparisonofenergybalanceandhydrologicalmodelsforlandsurfaceenergyfluxestimationoverawholerivercatchment
AT rfensholt intercomparisonofenergybalanceandhydrologicalmodelsforlandsurfaceenergyfluxestimationoverawholerivercatchment