Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses”
The terms <i>hesitation, planner</i>, <i>filler</i>, and <i>filled pause</i> do not always refer to the same phonetic entities. This terminological conundrum is approached by investigating the observational, explanatory, and descriptive inadequacies of the terms i...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-02-01
|
| Series: | Languages |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/8/1/57 |
| _version_ | 1827749090318876672 |
|---|---|
| author | Malte Belz |
| author_facet | Malte Belz |
| author_sort | Malte Belz |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The terms <i>hesitation, planner</i>, <i>filler</i>, and <i>filled pause</i> do not always refer to the same phonetic entities. This terminological conundrum is approached by investigating the observational, explanatory, and descriptive inadequacies of the terms in use. Concomitantly, the term <i>filler particle</i> is motivated and a definition is proposed that identifies its phonetic exponents and describes them within the linguistic category of particles. The definition of filler particles proposed here is grounded both theoretically and empirically and then applied to a corpus of spontaneous dialogues with 32 speakers of German, showing that in addition to the prototypical phonetic forms, there is a substantial amount of non-prototypical forms, i.e., 9.5%, comprising both glottal (e.g., [Ɂ]) and vocal forms (e.g., [ɛɸ], [<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><munder><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mo>~</mo></munder></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>ɛvə]). The grammatical classification and the results regarding the phonetic forms are discussed with respect to their theoretical relevance in filler particle research and corpus studies. The phonetic approach taken here further suggests a continuum of phonetic forms of filler particles, ranging from singleton segments to multi-syllabic entities. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:17:58Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-28066cbf348741d9957d0dc8b9950a1e |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2226-471X |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T06:17:58Z |
| publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Languages |
| spelling | doaj.art-28066cbf348741d9957d0dc8b9950a1e2023-11-17T12:09:16ZengMDPI AGLanguages2226-471X2023-02-01815710.3390/languages8010057Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses”Malte Belz0Department of German Studies and Linguistics, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, GermanyThe terms <i>hesitation, planner</i>, <i>filler</i>, and <i>filled pause</i> do not always refer to the same phonetic entities. This terminological conundrum is approached by investigating the observational, explanatory, and descriptive inadequacies of the terms in use. Concomitantly, the term <i>filler particle</i> is motivated and a definition is proposed that identifies its phonetic exponents and describes them within the linguistic category of particles. The definition of filler particles proposed here is grounded both theoretically and empirically and then applied to a corpus of spontaneous dialogues with 32 speakers of German, showing that in addition to the prototypical phonetic forms, there is a substantial amount of non-prototypical forms, i.e., 9.5%, comprising both glottal (e.g., [Ɂ]) and vocal forms (e.g., [ɛɸ], [<inline-formula><math xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" display="inline"><semantics><mrow><munder><mi mathvariant="normal">j</mi><mo>~</mo></munder></mrow></semantics></math></inline-formula>ɛvə]). The grammatical classification and the results regarding the phonetic forms are discussed with respect to their theoretical relevance in filler particle research and corpus studies. The phonetic approach taken here further suggests a continuum of phonetic forms of filler particles, ranging from singleton segments to multi-syllabic entities.https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/8/1/57fillerfilled pausehesitationfiller particlephonetic formdefinition |
| spellingShingle | Malte Belz Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” Languages filler filled pause hesitation filler particle phonetic form definition |
| title | Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” |
| title_full | Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” |
| title_fullStr | Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” |
| title_full_unstemmed | Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” |
| title_short | Defining Filler Particles: A Phonetic Account of the Terminology, Form, and Grammatical Classification of “Filled Pauses” |
| title_sort | defining filler particles a phonetic account of the terminology form and grammatical classification of filled pauses |
| topic | filler filled pause hesitation filler particle phonetic form definition |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/8/1/57 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT maltebelz definingfillerparticlesaphoneticaccountoftheterminologyformandgrammaticalclassificationoffilledpauses |