E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau
This article first disputes the traditional view of Realist School of international relations as inherently positivistic, and second presents a reaction to the polemic taking its course in pages of this journal between Marek Loužek and Petr Drulák. In the first part, those aspects of the work of E....
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Institute of International Relations Prague
2006-03-01
|
| Series: | Czech Journal of International Relations |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/624 |
| _version_ | 1811168268380012544 |
|---|---|
| author | Tomáš Blažek |
| author_facet | Tomáš Blažek |
| author_sort | Tomáš Blažek |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description |
This article first disputes the traditional view of Realist School of
international relations as inherently positivistic, and second presents a
reaction to the polemic taking its course in pages of this journal between
Marek Loužek and Petr Drulák. In the first part, those aspects of the work of
E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau that challenge their placing in the
positivist camp are presented. In the second part, these remarks are used
as a critique of Marek Loužek's schematic division of theories of
international relations as between normativist idealism and positivist
realism.
|
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:24:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-281db42e67424964af00acc985d92e4b |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 0323-1844 2570-9429 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T16:24:20Z |
| publishDate | 2006-03-01 |
| publisher | Institute of International Relations Prague |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Czech Journal of International Relations |
| spelling | doaj.art-281db42e67424964af00acc985d92e4b2023-02-09T08:25:13ZengInstitute of International Relations PragueCzech Journal of International Relations0323-18442570-94292006-03-01411sE. H. Carr and Hans MorgenthauTomáš Blažek This article first disputes the traditional view of Realist School of international relations as inherently positivistic, and second presents a reaction to the polemic taking its course in pages of this journal between Marek Loužek and Petr Drulák. In the first part, those aspects of the work of E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau that challenge their placing in the positivist camp are presented. In the second part, these remarks are used as a critique of Marek Loužek's schematic division of theories of international relations as between normativist idealism and positivist realism. https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/624RealismepistemologyE. H. CarrH. Morgenthaupositivism |
| spellingShingle | Tomáš Blažek E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau Czech Journal of International Relations Realism epistemology E. H. Carr H. Morgenthau positivism |
| title | E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau |
| title_full | E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau |
| title_fullStr | E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau |
| title_full_unstemmed | E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau |
| title_short | E. H. Carr and Hans Morgenthau |
| title_sort | e h carr and hans morgenthau |
| topic | Realism epistemology E. H. Carr H. Morgenthau positivism |
| url | https://ojs3.iir.cz/index.php/cjir/article/view/624 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT tomasblazek ehcarrandhansmorgenthau |