A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice

<p>Abstract</p> <p>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (<it>DSM</it>) of the American Psychiatric Association, currently in its fourth edition and considered <it>the </it>reference for the characterization and diagnosis of mental disorders, has undergone v...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kawa Shadia, Giordano James
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2012-01-01
Series:Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.peh-med.com/content/7/1/2
_version_ 1818808643845357568
author Kawa Shadia
Giordano James
author_facet Kawa Shadia
Giordano James
author_sort Kawa Shadia
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (<it>DSM</it>) of the American Psychiatric Association, currently in its fourth edition and considered <it>the </it>reference for the characterization and diagnosis of mental disorders, has undergone various developments since its inception in the mid-twentieth century. With the fifth edition of the <it>DSM </it>presently in field trials for release in 2013, there is renewed discussion and debate over the extent of its relative successes - and shortcomings - at iteratively incorporating scientific evidence on the often ambiguous nature and etiology of mental illness. Given the power that the <it>DSM </it>has exerted both within psychiatry and society at large, this essay seeks to analyze variations in content and context of various editions of the <it>DSM</it>, address contributory influences and repercussion of such variations on the evolving landscape of psychiatry as discipline and practice over the past sixty years. Specifically, we document major modifications in the definition, characterization, and classification of mental disorders throughout successive editions of the <it>DSM</it>, in light of shifting trends in the conceptualization of psychopathology within evolving schools of thought in psychiatry, and in the context of progress in behavioral and psychopharmacological therapeutics over time. We touch upon the social, political, and financial environments in which these changes took places, address the significance of these changes with respect to the legitimacy (and legitimization) of what constitutes mental illness and health, and examine the impact and implications of these changes on psychiatric practice, research, and teaching. We argue that problematic issues in psychiatry, arguably reflecting the large-scale adoption of the <it>DSM</it>, may be linked to difficulties in formulating a standardized nosology of psychopathology. In this light, we highlight 1) issues relating to attempts to align the <it>DSM </it>with the medical model, with regard to increasing specificity in the characterization of discrete mental disease entities and the incorporation of neurogenetic, neurochemical and neuroimaging data in its nosological framework; 2) controversies surrounding the medicalization of cognition, emotion, and behavior, and the interpretation of subjective variables as 'normal' or 'abnormal' in the context of society and culture; and 3) what constitutes treatment, enablement, or enhancement - and what metrics, guidelines, and policies may need to be established to clarify such criteria.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-18T19:44:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-282c9f0c09384ccfa575e54167456d6f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1747-5341
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-18T19:44:50Z
publishDate 2012-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
spelling doaj.art-282c9f0c09384ccfa575e54167456d6f2022-12-21T20:55:20ZengBMCPhilosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine1747-53412012-01-0171210.1186/1747-5341-7-2A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practiceKawa ShadiaGiordano James<p>Abstract</p> <p>The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (<it>DSM</it>) of the American Psychiatric Association, currently in its fourth edition and considered <it>the </it>reference for the characterization and diagnosis of mental disorders, has undergone various developments since its inception in the mid-twentieth century. With the fifth edition of the <it>DSM </it>presently in field trials for release in 2013, there is renewed discussion and debate over the extent of its relative successes - and shortcomings - at iteratively incorporating scientific evidence on the often ambiguous nature and etiology of mental illness. Given the power that the <it>DSM </it>has exerted both within psychiatry and society at large, this essay seeks to analyze variations in content and context of various editions of the <it>DSM</it>, address contributory influences and repercussion of such variations on the evolving landscape of psychiatry as discipline and practice over the past sixty years. Specifically, we document major modifications in the definition, characterization, and classification of mental disorders throughout successive editions of the <it>DSM</it>, in light of shifting trends in the conceptualization of psychopathology within evolving schools of thought in psychiatry, and in the context of progress in behavioral and psychopharmacological therapeutics over time. We touch upon the social, political, and financial environments in which these changes took places, address the significance of these changes with respect to the legitimacy (and legitimization) of what constitutes mental illness and health, and examine the impact and implications of these changes on psychiatric practice, research, and teaching. We argue that problematic issues in psychiatry, arguably reflecting the large-scale adoption of the <it>DSM</it>, may be linked to difficulties in formulating a standardized nosology of psychopathology. In this light, we highlight 1) issues relating to attempts to align the <it>DSM </it>with the medical model, with regard to increasing specificity in the characterization of discrete mental disease entities and the incorporation of neurogenetic, neurochemical and neuroimaging data in its nosological framework; 2) controversies surrounding the medicalization of cognition, emotion, and behavior, and the interpretation of subjective variables as 'normal' or 'abnormal' in the context of society and culture; and 3) what constitutes treatment, enablement, or enhancement - and what metrics, guidelines, and policies may need to be established to clarify such criteria.</p>http://www.peh-med.com/content/7/1/2Psychiatry, <it>DSM</it>classificationnosologypsychopathologymental disordershistoricity
spellingShingle Kawa Shadia
Giordano James
A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
Psychiatry, <it>DSM</it>
classification
nosology
psychopathology
mental disorders
historicity
title A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
title_full A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
title_fullStr A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
title_full_unstemmed A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
title_short A brief historicity of the <it>Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders</it>: Issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
title_sort brief historicity of the it diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders it issues and implications for the future of psychiatric canon and practice
topic Psychiatry, <it>DSM</it>
classification
nosology
psychopathology
mental disorders
historicity
url http://www.peh-med.com/content/7/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT kawashadia abriefhistoricityoftheitdiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersitissuesandimplicationsforthefutureofpsychiatriccanonandpractice
AT giordanojames abriefhistoricityoftheitdiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersitissuesandimplicationsforthefutureofpsychiatriccanonandpractice
AT kawashadia briefhistoricityoftheitdiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersitissuesandimplicationsforthefutureofpsychiatriccanonandpractice
AT giordanojames briefhistoricityoftheitdiagnosticandstatisticalmanualofmentaldisordersitissuesandimplicationsforthefutureofpsychiatriccanonandpractice