Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations

Abstract Background The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Denise Alexander, Mary Quirke, Carmel Doyle, Katie Hill, Kate Masterson, Maria Brenner
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2023-07-01
Series:BMC Medical Ethics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6
_version_ 1797451523482976256
author Denise Alexander
Mary Quirke
Carmel Doyle
Katie Hill
Kate Masterson
Maria Brenner
author_facet Denise Alexander
Mary Quirke
Carmel Doyle
Katie Hill
Kate Masterson
Maria Brenner
author_sort Denise Alexander
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring for these children navigate an increasing array of ethical complexities. This study looks at the meaning clinicians give to the bioethical considerations associated with the availability of increasingly sophisticated technology. Methods A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of the experiences of clinicians in deciding whether to initiate invasive long-term ventilation in children took place, via unstructured interviews. Data were analysed to gain insight into the lived experiences of clinicians. Participants were from PICUs, or closely allied to the care of children in PICUs, in four countries. Results Three themes developed from the data that portray the experiences of the clinicians: forming and managing relationships with parents and other clinicians considering, or using, life sustaining technology; the responsibility for moral and professional integrity in the use of technology; and keeping up with technological developments, and the resulting ethical and moral considerations. Discussion There are many benefits of the availability of long-term life-sustaining technology for a child, however, clinicians must also consider increasingly complex ethical dilemmas. Bioethical norms are adapting to aid clinicians, but challenges remain. Conclusion During a time of technological solutionism, more needs to be understood about the influences on the initiation of invasive long-term ventilation for a child. Further research to better understand how clinicians, and bioethics services, support care delivery may positively impact this arena of health care.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T14:55:52Z
format Article
id doaj.art-282dfdc6743f4baa99d2cedf71bf7e91
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1472-6939
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T14:55:52Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BMC Medical Ethics
spelling doaj.art-282dfdc6743f4baa99d2cedf71bf7e912023-11-26T14:10:01ZengBMCBMC Medical Ethics1472-69392023-07-012411910.1186/s12910-023-00937-6Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerationsDenise Alexander0Mary Quirke1Carmel Doyle2Katie Hill3Kate Masterson4Maria Brenner5School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College DublinSchool of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College DublinSchool of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Systems, University College DublinAbstract Background The use of long-term life-sustaining technology for children improves survival rates in paediatric intensive care units (PICUs), but it may also increase long-term morbidity. One example of this is children who are dependent on invasive long-term ventilation. Clinicians caring for these children navigate an increasing array of ethical complexities. This study looks at the meaning clinicians give to the bioethical considerations associated with the availability of increasingly sophisticated technology. Methods A hermeneutic phenomenological exploration of the experiences of clinicians in deciding whether to initiate invasive long-term ventilation in children took place, via unstructured interviews. Data were analysed to gain insight into the lived experiences of clinicians. Participants were from PICUs, or closely allied to the care of children in PICUs, in four countries. Results Three themes developed from the data that portray the experiences of the clinicians: forming and managing relationships with parents and other clinicians considering, or using, life sustaining technology; the responsibility for moral and professional integrity in the use of technology; and keeping up with technological developments, and the resulting ethical and moral considerations. Discussion There are many benefits of the availability of long-term life-sustaining technology for a child, however, clinicians must also consider increasingly complex ethical dilemmas. Bioethical norms are adapting to aid clinicians, but challenges remain. Conclusion During a time of technological solutionism, more needs to be understood about the influences on the initiation of invasive long-term ventilation for a child. Further research to better understand how clinicians, and bioethics services, support care delivery may positively impact this arena of health care.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6BioethicsChildClinical technologyComplex careLong-term ventilation
spellingShingle Denise Alexander
Mary Quirke
Carmel Doyle
Katie Hill
Kate Masterson
Maria Brenner
Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
BMC Medical Ethics
Bioethics
Child
Clinical technology
Complex care
Long-term ventilation
title Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_full Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_fullStr Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_full_unstemmed Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_short Technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care: clinicians’ perspectives of bioethical considerations
title_sort technology solutionism in paediatric intensive care clinicians perspectives of bioethical considerations
topic Bioethics
Child
Clinical technology
Complex care
Long-term ventilation
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00937-6
work_keys_str_mv AT denisealexander technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT maryquirke technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT carmeldoyle technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT katiehill technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT katemasterson technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations
AT mariabrenner technologysolutionisminpaediatricintensivecarecliniciansperspectivesofbioethicalconsiderations