Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?

Background: The aim of this article is to evaluate the histopathological findings of foreskin after circumcision for medical indications and to find out if analyzing the biopsy is a waste of resources. Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis was carried out of the medical records and histo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Hussein Naji, Esraa Jawad, Husam A Ahmed, Rajaa Mustafa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2013-01-01
Series:African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2013;volume=10;issue=2;spage=164;epage=166;aulast=Naji
_version_ 1818195772184723456
author Hussein Naji
Esraa Jawad
Husam A Ahmed
Rajaa Mustafa
author_facet Hussein Naji
Esraa Jawad
Husam A Ahmed
Rajaa Mustafa
author_sort Hussein Naji
collection DOAJ
description Background: The aim of this article is to evaluate the histopathological findings of foreskin after circumcision for medical indications and to find out if analyzing the biopsy is a waste of resources. Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis was carried out of the medical records and histopathological findings of 112 boys who underwent circumcision from June 2002 to June 2005. The study group consisted of 52 boys that were circumcised for medical indications, while the control group consisted of 60 boys who underwent circumcision for religious belief. Results: The mean (range) age of children in the study group was six (2-12) years. 36 boys had phimosis, 15 had recurrent balanoposthitis and one had paraphimosis as an indication for circumcision. Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) was diagnosed in eight out of 52 biopsies (15%). In five of the eight BXO, the histopathological examination revealed focal lichenoid infiltrate which was considered as early form of BXO. There was no suspicion of BXO in the physical examination of those five patients. Chronic inflammation was reported in seven patients, while minor changes in the form of minimal inflammation and oedema were found in another 15 patients. The rest of the biopsies (22 patients) showed normal preputial pathology. The histopathological examinations of the control group revealed chronic inflammation in three patients and acute inflammation with cellular oedema in another three patients. Conclusions: There is a place for routine biopsy after circumcision for medical indications. The clinical examination failed to suspect 5 of the 8 cases of BXO that were diagnosed by histopathology.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:23:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-283546dca0ee47b2a8835ad994d528a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0189-6725
0974-5998
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:23:30Z
publishDate 2013-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
spelling doaj.art-283546dca0ee47b2a8835ad994d528a42022-12-22T00:43:10ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsAfrican Journal of Paediatric Surgery0189-67250974-59982013-01-0110216416610.4103/0189-6725.115045Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?Hussein NajiEsraa JawadHusam A AhmedRajaa MustafaBackground: The aim of this article is to evaluate the histopathological findings of foreskin after circumcision for medical indications and to find out if analyzing the biopsy is a waste of resources. Material and Methods: This retrospective analysis was carried out of the medical records and histopathological findings of 112 boys who underwent circumcision from June 2002 to June 2005. The study group consisted of 52 boys that were circumcised for medical indications, while the control group consisted of 60 boys who underwent circumcision for religious belief. Results: The mean (range) age of children in the study group was six (2-12) years. 36 boys had phimosis, 15 had recurrent balanoposthitis and one had paraphimosis as an indication for circumcision. Balanitis xerotica obliterans (BXO) was diagnosed in eight out of 52 biopsies (15%). In five of the eight BXO, the histopathological examination revealed focal lichenoid infiltrate which was considered as early form of BXO. There was no suspicion of BXO in the physical examination of those five patients. Chronic inflammation was reported in seven patients, while minor changes in the form of minimal inflammation and oedema were found in another 15 patients. The rest of the biopsies (22 patients) showed normal preputial pathology. The histopathological examinations of the control group revealed chronic inflammation in three patients and acute inflammation with cellular oedema in another three patients. Conclusions: There is a place for routine biopsy after circumcision for medical indications. The clinical examination failed to suspect 5 of the 8 cases of BXO that were diagnosed by histopathology.http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2013;volume=10;issue=2;spage=164;epage=166;aulast=NajiBalanitis xerotica obliteranscircumcisionpathologyphimosis
spellingShingle Hussein Naji
Esraa Jawad
Husam A Ahmed
Rajaa Mustafa
Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
African Journal of Paediatric Surgery
Balanitis xerotica obliterans
circumcision
pathology
phimosis
title Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
title_full Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
title_fullStr Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
title_full_unstemmed Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
title_short Histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision: Is it a waste of resources?
title_sort histopathological examination of the prepuce after circumcision is it a waste of resources
topic Balanitis xerotica obliterans
circumcision
pathology
phimosis
url http://www.afrjpaedsurg.org/article.asp?issn=0189-6725;year=2013;volume=10;issue=2;spage=164;epage=166;aulast=Naji
work_keys_str_mv AT husseinnaji histopathologicalexaminationoftheprepuceaftercircumcisionisitawasteofresources
AT esraajawad histopathologicalexaminationoftheprepuceaftercircumcisionisitawasteofresources
AT husamaahmed histopathologicalexaminationoftheprepuceaftercircumcisionisitawasteofresources
AT rajaamustafa histopathologicalexaminationoftheprepuceaftercircumcisionisitawasteofresources