Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study

Abstract Background From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. H...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Merel M. C. Lambregts, Bart J. C. Hendriks, Leo G. Visser, Sandra T. Bernards, Mark G. J. de Boer
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2019-01-01
Series:Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0465-y
_version_ 1828762976049430528
author Merel M. C. Lambregts
Bart J. C. Hendriks
Leo G. Visser
Sandra T. Bernards
Mark G. J. de Boer
author_facet Merel M. C. Lambregts
Bart J. C. Hendriks
Leo G. Visser
Sandra T. Bernards
Mark G. J. de Boer
author_sort Merel M. C. Lambregts
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. How and when to escalate standard sepsis therapy to a reserve antimicrobial agent, is a recurrent dilemma. The study objective was to develop decision strategies for empiric sepsis therapy based on local microbiological and clinical data, and estimate the number needed to treat with a carbapenem to avoid mismatch of empiric therapy in one patient (NNTC). Methods We performed a nested case control study in patients (> 18 years) with Gram-negative bacteremia in 2013–2016. Cases were defined as patients with Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro resistance to the combination 2nd generation cephalosporin AND aminoglycoside (C-2GC + AG). Control patients had Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro susceptibility to cefuroxime AND/OR gentamicin, 1:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed for demographic and clinical predictors of resistance. The adequacy rates of empiric therapy and the NNTC were estimated for different strategies. Results The cohort consisted of 486 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in 450 patients. Median age was 66 years (IQR 56–74). In vitro resistance to C-2GC + AG was present in 44 patients (8.8%). Independent predictors for resistance to empiric sepsis therapy were hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 4.09, 95%CI 1.43–11.62, p < 0.01), previously cultured drug resistant pathogen (adjusted OR 3.72. 95%CI 1.72–8.03, p < 0.01) and antibiotic therapy during the preceding 2 months (adjusted OR 12.5 4.08–38.48, p < 0.01). With risk-based strategies, an adequacy rate of empiric therapy of 95.2–99.3% could be achieved. Compared to treating all patients with a carbapenem, the NNTC could be reduced by 82.8% (95%CI 78.5–87.5%) using the targeted approaches. Conclusions A risk-based approach in empiric sepsis therapy has the potential to better target the use of reserve antimicrobial agents aimed at multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A structured evaluation of the expected antimicrobial consumption and antibiotic adequacy rates is essential to be able to weigh the costs and benefits of potential antibiotic strategies and select the most appropriate approach.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T01:53:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-283a2710f25f499da89280d528a92240
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2047-2994
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T01:53:20Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
spelling doaj.art-283a2710f25f499da89280d528a922402022-12-22T01:24:41ZengBMCAntimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control2047-29942019-01-01811910.1186/s13756-019-0465-yUsing local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control studyMerel M. C. Lambregts0Bart J. C. Hendriks1Leo G. Visser2Sandra T. Bernards3Mark G. J. de Boer4Department of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy and Toxicology, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Leiden University Medical CenterDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical CenterAbstract Background From a stewardship perspective it is recommended that antibiotic guidelines are adjusted to the local setting, accounting for the local epidemiology of pathogens. In many settings the prevalence of Gram-negative pathogens with resistance to empiric sepsis therapy is increasing. How and when to escalate standard sepsis therapy to a reserve antimicrobial agent, is a recurrent dilemma. The study objective was to develop decision strategies for empiric sepsis therapy based on local microbiological and clinical data, and estimate the number needed to treat with a carbapenem to avoid mismatch of empiric therapy in one patient (NNTC). Methods We performed a nested case control study in patients (> 18 years) with Gram-negative bacteremia in 2013–2016. Cases were defined as patients with Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro resistance to the combination 2nd generation cephalosporin AND aminoglycoside (C-2GC + AG). Control patients had Gram-negative bacteremia with in vitro susceptibility to cefuroxime AND/OR gentamicin, 1:2 ratio. Univariate and multivariable analysis was performed for demographic and clinical predictors of resistance. The adequacy rates of empiric therapy and the NNTC were estimated for different strategies. Results The cohort consisted of 486 episodes of Gram-negative bacteremia in 450 patients. Median age was 66 years (IQR 56–74). In vitro resistance to C-2GC + AG was present in 44 patients (8.8%). Independent predictors for resistance to empiric sepsis therapy were hematologic malignancy (adjusted OR 4.09, 95%CI 1.43–11.62, p < 0.01), previously cultured drug resistant pathogen (adjusted OR 3.72. 95%CI 1.72–8.03, p < 0.01) and antibiotic therapy during the preceding 2 months (adjusted OR 12.5 4.08–38.48, p < 0.01). With risk-based strategies, an adequacy rate of empiric therapy of 95.2–99.3% could be achieved. Compared to treating all patients with a carbapenem, the NNTC could be reduced by 82.8% (95%CI 78.5–87.5%) using the targeted approaches. Conclusions A risk-based approach in empiric sepsis therapy has the potential to better target the use of reserve antimicrobial agents aimed at multi-resistant Gram-negative pathogens. A structured evaluation of the expected antimicrobial consumption and antibiotic adequacy rates is essential to be able to weigh the costs and benefits of potential antibiotic strategies and select the most appropriate approach.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0465-yAntibiotic stewardshipGuideline-developmentEmpiric therapySepsisAntimicrobial resistanceGram-negative bacteremia
spellingShingle Merel M. C. Lambregts
Bart J. C. Hendriks
Leo G. Visser
Sandra T. Bernards
Mark G. J. de Boer
Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control
Antibiotic stewardship
Guideline-development
Empiric therapy
Sepsis
Antimicrobial resistance
Gram-negative bacteremia
title Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
title_full Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
title_fullStr Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
title_full_unstemmed Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
title_short Using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem-sparing strategy in sepsis: a nested case-control study
title_sort using local clinical and microbiological data to develop an institution specific carbapenem sparing strategy in sepsis a nested case control study
topic Antibiotic stewardship
Guideline-development
Empiric therapy
Sepsis
Antimicrobial resistance
Gram-negative bacteremia
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13756-019-0465-y
work_keys_str_mv AT merelmclambregts usinglocalclinicalandmicrobiologicaldatatodevelopaninstitutionspecificcarbapenemsparingstrategyinsepsisanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT bartjchendriks usinglocalclinicalandmicrobiologicaldatatodevelopaninstitutionspecificcarbapenemsparingstrategyinsepsisanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT leogvisser usinglocalclinicalandmicrobiologicaldatatodevelopaninstitutionspecificcarbapenemsparingstrategyinsepsisanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT sandratbernards usinglocalclinicalandmicrobiologicaldatatodevelopaninstitutionspecificcarbapenemsparingstrategyinsepsisanestedcasecontrolstudy
AT markgjdeboer usinglocalclinicalandmicrobiologicaldatatodevelopaninstitutionspecificcarbapenemsparingstrategyinsepsisanestedcasecontrolstudy