Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice

The emergence of a leading alternative during the course of a decision is known to bias the evaluation of new information in a manner that favors that alternative. We report 3 studies that address the sensitivity of predecisional information distortion and its effects in hypothetical risky decisions...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Seth A. Miller, Michael L. DeKay, Eric R. Stone, Clare M. Sorenson
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cambridge University Press 2013-11-01
Series:Judgment and Decision Making
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13908/jdm13908.pdf
_version_ 1797706568596193280
author Seth A. Miller
Michael L. DeKay
Eric R. Stone
Clare M. Sorenson
author_facet Seth A. Miller
Michael L. DeKay
Eric R. Stone
Clare M. Sorenson
author_sort Seth A. Miller
collection DOAJ
description The emergence of a leading alternative during the course of a decision is known to bias the evaluation of new information in a manner that favors that alternative. We report 3 studies that address the sensitivity of predecisional information distortion and its effects in hypothetical risky decisions with regard to 4 potential influences: choice domain, repeated choice, memory requirements, and intermediate progress questions. In Experiment 1 (N = 515), the magnitude of information distortion was similar in 5 choice domains (varied between participants) involving monetary gambles, song downloads, frequent-flyer miles, political decisions, or medical decisions. Information distortion mediated the relationship between our manipulation of initial preferences and participants' final choices, with the magnitude of the indirect effect being roughly similar across domains. These results replicate and extend previous findings. Additionally, distortion decreased significantly over 4 similar decision problems (within participants), but remained significant in the fourth problem. In Experiment 2 (N = 214), information distortion increased significantly when previously viewed information remained available, apparently because reiterating that information strengthened emerging preferences. In Experiment 3 (N = 223), the removal of intermediate progress questions that measure information distortion and emerging preferences did not significantly affect final choices, again replicating previous results. We conclude that predecisional information distortion is a relatively stable and robust phenomenon that deserves a prominent role in descriptive theories of choice.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T05:53:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-283c7cfff3fb468096989e0163a329c3
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1930-2975
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T05:53:14Z
publishDate 2013-11-01
publisher Cambridge University Press
record_format Article
series Judgment and Decision Making
spelling doaj.art-283c7cfff3fb468096989e0163a329c32023-09-03T04:51:56ZengCambridge University PressJudgment and Decision Making1930-29752013-11-0186662677Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choiceSeth A. MillerMichael L. DeKayEric R. StoneClare M. SorensonThe emergence of a leading alternative during the course of a decision is known to bias the evaluation of new information in a manner that favors that alternative. We report 3 studies that address the sensitivity of predecisional information distortion and its effects in hypothetical risky decisions with regard to 4 potential influences: choice domain, repeated choice, memory requirements, and intermediate progress questions. In Experiment 1 (N = 515), the magnitude of information distortion was similar in 5 choice domains (varied between participants) involving monetary gambles, song downloads, frequent-flyer miles, political decisions, or medical decisions. Information distortion mediated the relationship between our manipulation of initial preferences and participants' final choices, with the magnitude of the indirect effect being roughly similar across domains. These results replicate and extend previous findings. Additionally, distortion decreased significantly over 4 similar decision problems (within participants), but remained significant in the fourth problem. In Experiment 2 (N = 214), information distortion increased significantly when previously viewed information remained available, apparently because reiterating that information strengthened emerging preferences. In Experiment 3 (N = 223), the removal of intermediate progress questions that measure information distortion and emerging preferences did not significantly affect final choices, again replicating previous results. We conclude that predecisional information distortion is a relatively stable and robust phenomenon that deserves a prominent role in descriptive theories of choice.http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13908/jdm13908.pdfinformation distortionmediationmemorypreference formationriskychoice.
spellingShingle Seth A. Miller
Michael L. DeKay
Eric R. Stone
Clare M. Sorenson
Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
Judgment and Decision Making
information distortion
mediation
memory
preference formation
riskychoice.
title Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
title_full Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
title_fullStr Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
title_full_unstemmed Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
title_short Assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
title_sort assessing the sensitivity of information distortion to four potential influences in studies of risky choice
topic information distortion
mediation
memory
preference formation
riskychoice.
url http://journal.sjdm.org/13/13908/jdm13908.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT sethamiller assessingthesensitivityofinformationdistortiontofourpotentialinfluencesinstudiesofriskychoice
AT michaelldekay assessingthesensitivityofinformationdistortiontofourpotentialinfluencesinstudiesofriskychoice
AT ericrstone assessingthesensitivityofinformationdistortiontofourpotentialinfluencesinstudiesofriskychoice
AT claremsorenson assessingthesensitivityofinformationdistortiontofourpotentialinfluencesinstudiesofriskychoice