Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?

Whatever mummification processes can be, natural or artificial, the aim of such a practice is usually to prevent a corpse to become skeletonized, and more generally to lessen the deterioration of the body which is to be buried. It is a peculiar step of some mortuary procedures (chaînes opératoires)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Pascal Sellier, Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme 2013-06-01
Series:Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2071
_version_ 1828429523888111616
author Pascal Sellier
Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento
author_facet Pascal Sellier
Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento
author_sort Pascal Sellier
collection DOAJ
description Whatever mummification processes can be, natural or artificial, the aim of such a practice is usually to prevent a corpse to become skeletonized, and more generally to lessen the deterioration of the body which is to be buried. It is a peculiar step of some mortuary procedures (chaînes opératoires) as if time were suspended, and resulting in a pause within the funerary schedule similar to what is induced by practices of temporary burial. Decay, however, begins again when the body is eventually laid down into its final burial, or when the preservative conditions are changed (frost, desiccative weather, etc.). This is why archaeologists should be able to identify such a previous mummification process, even when the body has become entirely skeletonized. From various archaeological or climatic contexts, the cases discussed in this paper (frozen bodies from the Altaï looted kourgans; bodies exposed and manipulated at Dzharkutan, Uzbekistan; mummification through desiccation among the ancient Islanders from Marquesas, French Polynesia) show that the key evidence for the diagnosis of mummification is given by the in situ analysis of the connections and dislocations of the joints of each skeleton. The disarticulation of some enduring or stable joints together with the connection of some least enduring ones (as far as decay of the joints is concerned) is an association which represents a dislocation of the joints in a « paradoxical order ». The inversion of the regular chronology of the decay of the joints in a human corpse is a sure evidence for the identification of a previous mummification process.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T17:34:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-284570e53c664e839dfaa3b2d8d2d78f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0242-7702
2425-1941
language fra
last_indexed 2024-12-10T17:34:36Z
publishDate 2013-06-01
publisher Editions de la Maison des Sciences de l'Homme
record_format Article
series Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
spelling doaj.art-284570e53c664e839dfaa3b2d8d2d78f2022-12-22T01:39:34ZfraEditions de la Maison des Sciences de l'HommeLes Nouvelles de l’Archéologie0242-77022425-19412013-06-01132303610.4000/nda.2071Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?Pascal SellierJulio Bendezu-SarmientoWhatever mummification processes can be, natural or artificial, the aim of such a practice is usually to prevent a corpse to become skeletonized, and more generally to lessen the deterioration of the body which is to be buried. It is a peculiar step of some mortuary procedures (chaînes opératoires) as if time were suspended, and resulting in a pause within the funerary schedule similar to what is induced by practices of temporary burial. Decay, however, begins again when the body is eventually laid down into its final burial, or when the preservative conditions are changed (frost, desiccative weather, etc.). This is why archaeologists should be able to identify such a previous mummification process, even when the body has become entirely skeletonized. From various archaeological or climatic contexts, the cases discussed in this paper (frozen bodies from the Altaï looted kourgans; bodies exposed and manipulated at Dzharkutan, Uzbekistan; mummification through desiccation among the ancient Islanders from Marquesas, French Polynesia) show that the key evidence for the diagnosis of mummification is given by the in situ analysis of the connections and dislocations of the joints of each skeleton. The disarticulation of some enduring or stable joints together with the connection of some least enduring ones (as far as decay of the joints is concerned) is an association which represents a dislocation of the joints in a « paradoxical order ». The inversion of the regular chronology of the decay of the joints in a human corpse is a sure evidence for the identification of a previous mummification process.http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2071burialCentral AsiadecayMarquesas Islands.mummification
spellingShingle Pascal Sellier
Julio Bendezu-Sarmiento
Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
Les Nouvelles de l’Archéologie
burial
Central Asia
decay
Marquesas Islands.
mummification
title Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
title_full Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
title_fullStr Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
title_full_unstemmed Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
title_short Différer la décomposition : le temps suspendu ?
title_sort differer la decomposition le temps suspendu
topic burial
Central Asia
decay
Marquesas Islands.
mummification
url http://journals.openedition.org/nda/2071
work_keys_str_mv AT pascalsellier differerladecompositionletempssuspendu
AT juliobendezusarmiento differerladecompositionletempssuspendu