Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Magnesium alloys as biodegradable implant materials received much interest in recent years. It is known that products of implant degradation can induce several types of immune response. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Angrisani Nina, Reifenrath Janin, Erdmann Nina, Hewicker-Trautwein Marion, Bondarenko Alexandr, Meyer-Lindenberg Andrea
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2011-04-01
Series:BioMedical Engineering OnLine
Online Access:http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/10/1/32
_version_ 1818482141716021248
author Angrisani Nina
Reifenrath Janin
Erdmann Nina
Hewicker-Trautwein Marion
Bondarenko Alexandr
Meyer-Lindenberg Andrea
author_facet Angrisani Nina
Reifenrath Janin
Erdmann Nina
Hewicker-Trautwein Marion
Bondarenko Alexandr
Meyer-Lindenberg Andrea
author_sort Angrisani Nina
collection DOAJ
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Magnesium alloys as biodegradable implant materials received much interest in recent years. It is known that products of implant degradation can induce several types of immune response. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the morphological changes of efferent lymph nodes after implantation of different resorbable magnesium alloys (MgCa0.8, LAE442) in comparison to commercially available resorbable (PLA) and non-resorbable (titanium) implant materials as well as control groups without implant material.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The different implant materials were inserted intramedullary into the rabbit tibia. After postoperative observation periods of three and six months, popliteal lymph nodes were examined histologically and immunhistologically and compared to lymph nodes of sham operated animals and animals without surgery. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was performed for cell differentiation. Mouse anti-CD79α and rat anti-CD3 monoclonal primary antibodies were used for B- and T-lymphocyte detection, mouse anti-CD68 primary antibodies for macrophage detection. Evaluation of all sections was performed applying a semi quantitative score.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The histological evaluation demonstrated low and moderate levels of morphological changes for both magnesium alloys (LAE442 and MgCa0.8). Higher than moderate values were reached for titanium in sinus histiocytosis and histiocytic apoptosis (3 months) and for PLA in histiocytic apoptosis (3 and 6 months). The immune response to all investigated implants had a non-specific character and predominantly was a foreign-body reaction. LAE442 provoked the lowest changes which might be due to a lower degradation rate in comparison to MgCa0.8. Therewith it is a promising candidate for implants with low immunogenic potential.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both examined magnesium alloys did not cause significantly increased morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes in comparison to the widely used implant materials titanium and PLA. LAE442 induced even lower immunological reactions. Therewith MgCa0.8 and especially LAE442 are appropriate candidates for biomedical use.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-10T11:44:16Z
format Article
id doaj.art-284d83f002654b329f00cef834a09aaa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1475-925X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T11:44:16Z
publishDate 2011-04-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series BioMedical Engineering OnLine
spelling doaj.art-284d83f002654b329f00cef834a09aaa2022-12-22T01:50:08ZengBMCBioMedical Engineering OnLine1475-925X2011-04-011013210.1186/1475-925X-10-32Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbitsAngrisani NinaReifenrath JaninErdmann NinaHewicker-Trautwein MarionBondarenko AlexandrMeyer-Lindenberg Andrea<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Magnesium alloys as biodegradable implant materials received much interest in recent years. It is known that products of implant degradation can induce several types of immune response. Hence, the aim of this study was to examine the morphological changes of efferent lymph nodes after implantation of different resorbable magnesium alloys (MgCa0.8, LAE442) in comparison to commercially available resorbable (PLA) and non-resorbable (titanium) implant materials as well as control groups without implant material.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>The different implant materials were inserted intramedullary into the rabbit tibia. After postoperative observation periods of three and six months, popliteal lymph nodes were examined histologically and immunhistologically and compared to lymph nodes of sham operated animals and animals without surgery. Haematoxylin and eosin staining was performed for cell differentiation. Mouse anti-CD79α and rat anti-CD3 monoclonal primary antibodies were used for B- and T-lymphocyte detection, mouse anti-CD68 primary antibodies for macrophage detection. Evaluation of all sections was performed applying a semi quantitative score.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>The histological evaluation demonstrated low and moderate levels of morphological changes for both magnesium alloys (LAE442 and MgCa0.8). Higher than moderate values were reached for titanium in sinus histiocytosis and histiocytic apoptosis (3 months) and for PLA in histiocytic apoptosis (3 and 6 months). The immune response to all investigated implants had a non-specific character and predominantly was a foreign-body reaction. LAE442 provoked the lowest changes which might be due to a lower degradation rate in comparison to MgCa0.8. Therewith it is a promising candidate for implants with low immunogenic potential.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Both examined magnesium alloys did not cause significantly increased morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes in comparison to the widely used implant materials titanium and PLA. LAE442 induced even lower immunological reactions. Therewith MgCa0.8 and especially LAE442 are appropriate candidates for biomedical use.</p>http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/10/1/32
spellingShingle Angrisani Nina
Reifenrath Janin
Erdmann Nina
Hewicker-Trautwein Marion
Bondarenko Alexandr
Meyer-Lindenberg Andrea
Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
BioMedical Engineering OnLine
title Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
title_full Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
title_fullStr Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
title_short Comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non-resorbable implants in rabbits
title_sort comparison of morphological changes in efferent lymph nodes after implantation of resorbable and non resorbable implants in rabbits
url http://www.biomedical-engineering-online.com/content/10/1/32
work_keys_str_mv AT angrisaninina comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits
AT reifenrathjanin comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits
AT erdmannnina comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits
AT hewickertrautweinmarion comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits
AT bondarenkoalexandr comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits
AT meyerlindenbergandrea comparisonofmorphologicalchangesinefferentlymphnodesafterimplantationofresorbableandnonresorbableimplantsinrabbits