An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence

Ambivalence is a mixed reaction toward an attitudinal object. Ambivalence is often viewed as aversive and people are motivated to reduce it. However, the presence of both strong positive and negative attitudes toward an object (objective ambivalence; OA) does not always lead to consciously experienc...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Jennifer Weng, Kenneth G. DeMarree
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2019-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00854/full
_version_ 1819237460491632640
author Jennifer Weng
Kenneth G. DeMarree
author_facet Jennifer Weng
Kenneth G. DeMarree
author_sort Jennifer Weng
collection DOAJ
description Ambivalence is a mixed reaction toward an attitudinal object. Ambivalence is often viewed as aversive and people are motivated to reduce it. However, the presence of both strong positive and negative attitudes toward an object (objective ambivalence; OA) does not always lead to consciously experienced conflicted and torn feelings (subjective ambivalence; SA) or psychological discomfort. We hypothesized that the way people think about their inner experience can affect whether ambivalent attitudes lead to increased conflicted feelings. In five studies, we examined whether mindfulness predicts the relationship between objective and subjective ambivalence. We predicted that the acceptance aspect of mindfulness would attenuate the relationship between OA and SA, based on the idea that acceptance makes people more tolerant and less judgmental toward their inner states in general (and OA in particular). Although some findings across five studies were consistent with the prediction showing that acceptance attenuated the OA–SA relationship, other findings were not and even showed that acceptance strengthened the OA–SA relationship. A meta-analysis of the interaction effect across all studies failed to find support for predictions (r = -0.036 and 95% CI [-0.087; 0.022]). We discuss possible reasons for these mixed findings, and the implications of these studies.
first_indexed 2024-12-23T13:20:41Z
format Article
id doaj.art-284e2d9b548545a9a39b909f363c8276
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-23T13:20:41Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-284e2d9b548545a9a39b909f363c82762022-12-21T17:45:28ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782019-04-011010.3389/fpsyg.2019.00854439488An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal AmbivalenceJennifer WengKenneth G. DeMarreeAmbivalence is a mixed reaction toward an attitudinal object. Ambivalence is often viewed as aversive and people are motivated to reduce it. However, the presence of both strong positive and negative attitudes toward an object (objective ambivalence; OA) does not always lead to consciously experienced conflicted and torn feelings (subjective ambivalence; SA) or psychological discomfort. We hypothesized that the way people think about their inner experience can affect whether ambivalent attitudes lead to increased conflicted feelings. In five studies, we examined whether mindfulness predicts the relationship between objective and subjective ambivalence. We predicted that the acceptance aspect of mindfulness would attenuate the relationship between OA and SA, based on the idea that acceptance makes people more tolerant and less judgmental toward their inner states in general (and OA in particular). Although some findings across five studies were consistent with the prediction showing that acceptance attenuated the OA–SA relationship, other findings were not and even showed that acceptance strengthened the OA–SA relationship. A meta-analysis of the interaction effect across all studies failed to find support for predictions (r = -0.036 and 95% CI [-0.087; 0.022]). We discuss possible reasons for these mixed findings, and the implications of these studies.https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00854/fullattitudesambivalencemindfulnessmetacognitionacceptance
spellingShingle Jennifer Weng
Kenneth G. DeMarree
An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
Frontiers in Psychology
attitudes
ambivalence
mindfulness
metacognition
acceptance
title An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
title_full An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
title_fullStr An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
title_full_unstemmed An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
title_short An Examination of Whether Mindfulness Can Predict the Relationship Between Objective and Subjective Attitudinal Ambivalence
title_sort examination of whether mindfulness can predict the relationship between objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence
topic attitudes
ambivalence
mindfulness
metacognition
acceptance
url https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00854/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jenniferweng anexaminationofwhethermindfulnesscanpredicttherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandsubjectiveattitudinalambivalence
AT kennethgdemarree anexaminationofwhethermindfulnesscanpredicttherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandsubjectiveattitudinalambivalence
AT jenniferweng examinationofwhethermindfulnesscanpredicttherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandsubjectiveattitudinalambivalence
AT kennethgdemarree examinationofwhethermindfulnesscanpredicttherelationshipbetweenobjectiveandsubjectiveattitudinalambivalence