Epistemic Communities under Active Inference

The spread of ideas is a fundamental concern of today’s news ecology. Understanding the dynamics of the spread of information and its co-option by interested parties is of critical importance. Research on this topic has shown that individuals tend to cluster in echo-chambers and are driven by confir...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Mahault Albarracin, Daphne Demekas, Maxwell J. D. Ramstead, Conor Heins
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-03-01
Series:Entropy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/476
_version_ 1797434782802509824
author Mahault Albarracin
Daphne Demekas
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead
Conor Heins
author_facet Mahault Albarracin
Daphne Demekas
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead
Conor Heins
author_sort Mahault Albarracin
collection DOAJ
description The spread of ideas is a fundamental concern of today’s news ecology. Understanding the dynamics of the spread of information and its co-option by interested parties is of critical importance. Research on this topic has shown that individuals tend to cluster in echo-chambers and are driven by confirmation bias. In this paper, we leverage the active inference framework to provide an in silico model of confirmation bias and its effect on echo-chamber formation. We build a model based on active inference, where agents tend to sample information in order to justify their own view of reality, which eventually leads to them to have a high degree of certainty about their own beliefs. We show that, once agents have reached a certain level of certainty about their beliefs, it becomes very difficult to get them to change their views. This system of self-confirming beliefs is upheld and reinforced by the evolving relationship between an agent’s beliefs and observations, which over time will continue to provide evidence for their ingrained ideas about the world. The epistemic communities that are consolidated by these shared beliefs, in turn, tend to produce perceptions of reality that reinforce those shared beliefs. We provide an active inference account of this community formation mechanism. We postulate that agents are driven by the epistemic value that they obtain from sampling or observing the behaviours of other agents. Inspired by digital social networks like Twitter, we build a generative model in which agents generate observable social claims or posts (e.g., ‘tweets’) while reading the socially observable claims of other agents that lend support to one of two mutually exclusive abstract topics. Agents can choose which other agent they pay attention to at each timestep, and crucially who they attend to and what they choose to read influences their beliefs about the world. Agents also assess their local network’s perspective, influencing which kinds of posts they expect to see other agents making. The model was built and simulated using the freely available Python package pymdp. The proposed active inference model can reproduce the formation of echo-chambers over social networks, and gives us insight into the cognitive processes that lead to this phenomenon.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T10:37:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-285604604675407ca022dfc64106df8b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1099-4300
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T10:37:00Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Entropy
spelling doaj.art-285604604675407ca022dfc64106df8b2023-12-01T20:50:05ZengMDPI AGEntropy1099-43002022-03-0124447610.3390/e24040476Epistemic Communities under Active InferenceMahault Albarracin0Daphne Demekas1Maxwell J. D. Ramstead2Conor Heins3Department of Cognitive Computing, Université du Québec a Montreal, Montreal, QC H2K 4M1, CanadaDepartment of Computing, Imperial College London, London SW7 5NH, UKVERSES Labs, Los Angeles, CA 90016, USAVERSES Labs, Los Angeles, CA 90016, USAThe spread of ideas is a fundamental concern of today’s news ecology. Understanding the dynamics of the spread of information and its co-option by interested parties is of critical importance. Research on this topic has shown that individuals tend to cluster in echo-chambers and are driven by confirmation bias. In this paper, we leverage the active inference framework to provide an in silico model of confirmation bias and its effect on echo-chamber formation. We build a model based on active inference, where agents tend to sample information in order to justify their own view of reality, which eventually leads to them to have a high degree of certainty about their own beliefs. We show that, once agents have reached a certain level of certainty about their beliefs, it becomes very difficult to get them to change their views. This system of self-confirming beliefs is upheld and reinforced by the evolving relationship between an agent’s beliefs and observations, which over time will continue to provide evidence for their ingrained ideas about the world. The epistemic communities that are consolidated by these shared beliefs, in turn, tend to produce perceptions of reality that reinforce those shared beliefs. We provide an active inference account of this community formation mechanism. We postulate that agents are driven by the epistemic value that they obtain from sampling or observing the behaviours of other agents. Inspired by digital social networks like Twitter, we build a generative model in which agents generate observable social claims or posts (e.g., ‘tweets’) while reading the socially observable claims of other agents that lend support to one of two mutually exclusive abstract topics. Agents can choose which other agent they pay attention to at each timestep, and crucially who they attend to and what they choose to read influences their beliefs about the world. Agents also assess their local network’s perspective, influencing which kinds of posts they expect to see other agents making. The model was built and simulated using the freely available Python package pymdp. The proposed active inference model can reproduce the formation of echo-chambers over social networks, and gives us insight into the cognitive processes that lead to this phenomenon.https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/476epistemic communitysocial mediaactive inferenceopinion dynamics
spellingShingle Mahault Albarracin
Daphne Demekas
Maxwell J. D. Ramstead
Conor Heins
Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
Entropy
epistemic community
social media
active inference
opinion dynamics
title Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
title_full Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
title_fullStr Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
title_full_unstemmed Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
title_short Epistemic Communities under Active Inference
title_sort epistemic communities under active inference
topic epistemic community
social media
active inference
opinion dynamics
url https://www.mdpi.com/1099-4300/24/4/476
work_keys_str_mv AT mahaultalbarracin epistemiccommunitiesunderactiveinference
AT daphnedemekas epistemiccommunitiesunderactiveinference
AT maxwelljdramstead epistemiccommunitiesunderactiveinference
AT conorheins epistemiccommunitiesunderactiveinference