Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy

<p>doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6</a></p><p>The State of Bay–Delta Science 2008 highlighted seven emerging perspectives on science and management of the Del...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Michael Healey, Michael Dettinger, Richard Norgaard
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: eScholarship Publishing, University of California 2016-12-01
Series:San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jz6v535
_version_ 1828765384567685120
author Michael Healey
Michael Dettinger
Richard Norgaard
author_facet Michael Healey
Michael Dettinger
Richard Norgaard
author_sort Michael Healey
collection DOAJ
description <p>doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6</a></p><p>The State of Bay–Delta Science 2008 highlighted seven emerging perspectives on science and management of the Delta. These perspectives had important effects on policy and legislation concerning management of the Delta ecosystem and water exports. From the collection of papers that make up the State of Bay–Delta Science 2016<em>,</em> we derive another seven perspectives that augment those published in 2008. The new perspectives address nutrient and contaminant concentrations in Delta waters, the failure of the Delta food web to support native species, the role of multiple stressors in driving species toward extinction, and the emerging importance of extreme events in driving change in the ecosystem and the water supply.</p> <p>The scientific advances that underpin these new perspectives were made possible by new measurement and analytic tools. We briefly discuss some of these, including miniaturized acoustic fish tags, sensors for monitoring of water quality, analytic techniques for disaggregating complex contaminant mixtures, remote sensing to assess levee vulnerability, and multidimensional hydrodynamic modeling.</p> <p>Despite these new tools and scientific insights, species conservation objectives for the Delta are not being met. We believe that this lack of progress stems in part from the fact that science and policy do not incorporate sufficiently long-term perspectives. Looking forward half a century was central to the Delta Visioning process, but science and policy have not embraced this conceptual breadth. We are also concerned that protection and enhancement of the unique cultural, recreational, natural resource, and agricultural values of the Delta as an evolving place, as required by the Delta Reform Act, has received no critical study and analysis. Adopting wider and longer science and policy perspectives immediately encourages recognition of the need for evaluation, analysis, and public discourse on novel conservation approaches. These longer and wider perspectives also encourage more attention to the opportunities provided by heavily invaded ecosystems. It is past time to turn scientific and policy attention to these issues.</p>
first_indexed 2024-12-11T06:46:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-285ad457c5f947e981de94978d8b18f4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1546-2366
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T06:46:50Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher eScholarship Publishing, University of California
record_format Article
series San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
spelling doaj.art-285ad457c5f947e981de94978d8b18f42022-12-22T01:17:02ZengeScholarship Publishing, University of CaliforniaSan Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science1546-23662016-12-01144ark:13030/qt7jz6v535Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and PolicyMichael Healey0Michael Dettinger1Richard Norgaard2University of British Columbia, Vancouver BCU.S. Geological Survey, Carson City, NVUniversity of California, Berkeley<p>doi: <a href="https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.15447/sfews.2016v14iss4art6</a></p><p>The State of Bay–Delta Science 2008 highlighted seven emerging perspectives on science and management of the Delta. These perspectives had important effects on policy and legislation concerning management of the Delta ecosystem and water exports. From the collection of papers that make up the State of Bay–Delta Science 2016<em>,</em> we derive another seven perspectives that augment those published in 2008. The new perspectives address nutrient and contaminant concentrations in Delta waters, the failure of the Delta food web to support native species, the role of multiple stressors in driving species toward extinction, and the emerging importance of extreme events in driving change in the ecosystem and the water supply.</p> <p>The scientific advances that underpin these new perspectives were made possible by new measurement and analytic tools. We briefly discuss some of these, including miniaturized acoustic fish tags, sensors for monitoring of water quality, analytic techniques for disaggregating complex contaminant mixtures, remote sensing to assess levee vulnerability, and multidimensional hydrodynamic modeling.</p> <p>Despite these new tools and scientific insights, species conservation objectives for the Delta are not being met. We believe that this lack of progress stems in part from the fact that science and policy do not incorporate sufficiently long-term perspectives. Looking forward half a century was central to the Delta Visioning process, but science and policy have not embraced this conceptual breadth. We are also concerned that protection and enhancement of the unique cultural, recreational, natural resource, and agricultural values of the Delta as an evolving place, as required by the Delta Reform Act, has received no critical study and analysis. Adopting wider and longer science and policy perspectives immediately encourages recognition of the need for evaluation, analysis, and public discourse on novel conservation approaches. These longer and wider perspectives also encourage more attention to the opportunities provided by heavily invaded ecosystems. It is past time to turn scientific and policy attention to these issues.</p>http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jz6v535Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, scientific advances, new science perspectives, new scientific tools, policy perspectives, novel conservation methods
spellingShingle Michael Healey
Michael Dettinger
Richard Norgaard
Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
San Francisco Estuary and Watershed Science
Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, scientific advances, new science perspectives, new scientific tools, policy perspectives, novel conservation methods
title Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
title_full Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
title_fullStr Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
title_full_unstemmed Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
title_short Perspectives on Bay–Delta Science and Policy
title_sort perspectives on bay delta science and policy
topic Sacramento–San Joaquin Delta, scientific advances, new science perspectives, new scientific tools, policy perspectives, novel conservation methods
url http://escholarship.org/uc/item/7jz6v535
work_keys_str_mv AT michaelhealey perspectivesonbaydeltascienceandpolicy
AT michaeldettinger perspectivesonbaydeltascienceandpolicy
AT richardnorgaard perspectivesonbaydeltascienceandpolicy