Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global One Health threat. A portion of AMR development can be attributed to antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals, including dairy cattle. Quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms is necessary to inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies and help evaluate the relationsh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhengyu Lu, Ece Bulut, Daryl V. Nydam, Renata Ivanek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-01
Series:Frontiers in Antibiotics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frabi.2023.1176817/full
_version_ 1797418714498334720
author Zhengyu Lu
Ece Bulut
Daryl V. Nydam
Renata Ivanek
author_facet Zhengyu Lu
Ece Bulut
Daryl V. Nydam
Renata Ivanek
author_sort Zhengyu Lu
collection DOAJ
description Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global One Health threat. A portion of AMR development can be attributed to antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals, including dairy cattle. Quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms is necessary to inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies and help evaluate the relationship between AMU and AMR. Many AMU indicators have been proposed for quantifying AMU in dairy cattle. However, these indicators are difficult to interpret and compare because they differ in the type of data used, the calculation approach, and the definitions of variables and parameters used in the calculation. Therefore, we selected 16 indicators (count-based, mass-based, and dose-based) applicable for quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms. We systematized the indicators by standardizing their variables and parameters to improve their interchangeability, interpretation, and comparability. We scored indicators against six data-driven criteria (assessing their accuracy, data and effort needs, and level of privacy concern) and five stewardship-driven criteria (assessing their ability to capture trends and inform antimicrobial stewardship). The derived standardized indicators will aid farmers and veterinarians in selecting suitable indicators based on data availability and stewardship needs on a farm. The comparison of indicators revealed a trade-off requiring farmers to balance the granularity of data necessary for an accurate indicator and effort to collect the data, and a trade-off relevant to farmers interested in data sharing to inform stewardship because more accurate indicators are typically based on more sensitive information. Indicators with better accuracy tended to score better in stewardship criteria. Overall, two dose-based indicators, estimating the number of treatments and administered doses, scored best in accuracy and stewardship. Conversely, two count-based indicators, estimating the length of AMU, and a mass-based indicator, estimating the mass of administered antimicrobials, performed best in the effort and privacy criteria. These findings are expected to benefit One Health by aiding the uptake of farm-level AMU indicators by U.S. dairy farms.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T06:36:57Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28760c7c5bdb47a2b1082a9c8bf9873c
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2813-2467
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T06:36:57Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Antibiotics
spelling doaj.art-28760c7c5bdb47a2b1082a9c8bf9873c2023-12-03T10:55:50ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Antibiotics2813-24672023-08-01210.3389/frabi.2023.11768171176817Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farmsZhengyu Lu0Ece Bulut1Daryl V. Nydam2Renata Ivanek3Department of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United StatesDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United StatesDepartment of Public and Ecosystem Health, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United StatesDepartment of Population Medicine and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United StatesAntimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global One Health threat. A portion of AMR development can be attributed to antimicrobial use (AMU) in animals, including dairy cattle. Quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms is necessary to inform antimicrobial stewardship strategies and help evaluate the relationship between AMU and AMR. Many AMU indicators have been proposed for quantifying AMU in dairy cattle. However, these indicators are difficult to interpret and compare because they differ in the type of data used, the calculation approach, and the definitions of variables and parameters used in the calculation. Therefore, we selected 16 indicators (count-based, mass-based, and dose-based) applicable for quantifying AMU on U.S. dairy farms. We systematized the indicators by standardizing their variables and parameters to improve their interchangeability, interpretation, and comparability. We scored indicators against six data-driven criteria (assessing their accuracy, data and effort needs, and level of privacy concern) and five stewardship-driven criteria (assessing their ability to capture trends and inform antimicrobial stewardship). The derived standardized indicators will aid farmers and veterinarians in selecting suitable indicators based on data availability and stewardship needs on a farm. The comparison of indicators revealed a trade-off requiring farmers to balance the granularity of data necessary for an accurate indicator and effort to collect the data, and a trade-off relevant to farmers interested in data sharing to inform stewardship because more accurate indicators are typically based on more sensitive information. Indicators with better accuracy tended to score better in stewardship criteria. Overall, two dose-based indicators, estimating the number of treatments and administered doses, scored best in accuracy and stewardship. Conversely, two count-based indicators, estimating the length of AMU, and a mass-based indicator, estimating the mass of administered antimicrobials, performed best in the effort and privacy criteria. These findings are expected to benefit One Health by aiding the uptake of farm-level AMU indicators by U.S. dairy farms.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frabi.2023.1176817/fulldairy cattleantimicrobial useantimicrobial stewardshipindicatorsprivacy
spellingShingle Zhengyu Lu
Ece Bulut
Daryl V. Nydam
Renata Ivanek
Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
Frontiers in Antibiotics
dairy cattle
antimicrobial use
antimicrobial stewardship
indicators
privacy
title Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
title_full Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
title_fullStr Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
title_full_unstemmed Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
title_short Standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on U.S. dairy farms
title_sort standardization and evaluation of indicators for quantifying antimicrobial use on u s dairy farms
topic dairy cattle
antimicrobial use
antimicrobial stewardship
indicators
privacy
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frabi.2023.1176817/full
work_keys_str_mv AT zhengyulu standardizationandevaluationofindicatorsforquantifyingantimicrobialuseonusdairyfarms
AT ecebulut standardizationandevaluationofindicatorsforquantifyingantimicrobialuseonusdairyfarms
AT darylvnydam standardizationandevaluationofindicatorsforquantifyingantimicrobialuseonusdairyfarms
AT renataivanek standardizationandevaluationofindicatorsforquantifyingantimicrobialuseonusdairyfarms