Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
BackgroundCurrently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are widely used in clinical practice. At the same time, there are a variety of drug options for DMTs, but the effect of the drugs that can better relieve symptoms and improve the prognosis are still inco...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2024-03-01
|
Series: | Frontiers in Neurology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1295770/full |
_version_ | 1797265924724621312 |
---|---|
author | Xin Wu Shixin Wang Tao Xue Xin Tan Jiaxuan Li Zhouqing Chen Zhong Wang |
author_facet | Xin Wu Shixin Wang Tao Xue Xin Tan Jiaxuan Li Zhouqing Chen Zhong Wang |
author_sort | Xin Wu |
collection | DOAJ |
description | BackgroundCurrently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are widely used in clinical practice. At the same time, there are a variety of drug options for DMTs, but the effect of the drugs that can better relieve symptoms and improve the prognosis are still inconclusive.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs for PMS and to identify the best among these drugs.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 30 January, 2023. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the confidence in the network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. We estimated the summary risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).ResultsWe included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,234 patients in the study. DMT can effectively control the disease progression of MS. Among them, mitoxantrone, siponimod, and ocrelizumab are superior to other drug options in delaying disease progression (high certainty). Mitoxantrone was the best (with high certainty) for mitigating deterioration (progression of disability). Ocrelizumab performed best on the pre- and post-treatment Timed 25-Foot Walk test (T25FW; low certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.12–1.05). In the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), natalizumab performed the best (high certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.59–1.09). In terms of imaging, IFN-beta-1b performed better on the new T2 hypointense lesion on contrast, before and after treatment (high certainty), while siponimod performed best on the change from baseline in the total volume of lesions on T2-weighted image contrast before and after treatment (high certainty), and sWASO had the highest area under the curve (SUCRA) value (100%). In terms of adverse events (AEs), rituximab (RR 1.01), and laquinimod (RR 1.02) were more effective than the placebo (high certainty). In terms of serious adverse events (SAEs), natalizumab (RR 1.09), and ocrelizumab (RR 1.07) were safer than placebo (high certainty).ConclusionDMTs can effectively control disease progression and reduce disease deterioration during the treatment of PMS.Systematic review registrationhttps://inplasy.com/?s=202320071, identifier: 202320071. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:52:32Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-28acd6896b274ba9b45115124d124335 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1664-2295 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-25T00:52:32Z |
publishDate | 2024-03-01 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | Article |
series | Frontiers in Neurology |
spelling | doaj.art-28acd6896b274ba9b45115124d1243352024-03-11T15:10:20ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neurology1664-22952024-03-011510.3389/fneur.2024.12957701295770Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsXin Wu0Shixin Wang1Tao Xue2Xin Tan3Jiaxuan Li4Zhouqing Chen5Zhong Wang6Department of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, ChinaDepartment of Neurology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou Municipal Hospital, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaDepartment of Neurosurgery and Brain and Nerve Research Laboratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, Jiangsu, ChinaBackgroundCurrently, disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) are widely used in clinical practice. At the same time, there are a variety of drug options for DMTs, but the effect of the drugs that can better relieve symptoms and improve the prognosis are still inconclusive.ObjectivesThis systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DMTs for PMS and to identify the best among these drugs.MethodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and clinicaltrials.gov were systematically searched to identify relevant studies published before 30 January, 2023. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the confidence in the network meta-analysis (CINeMA) framework. We estimated the summary risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences (MD) for continuous outcomes with 95% credible intervals (CrIs).ResultsWe included 18 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 9,234 patients in the study. DMT can effectively control the disease progression of MS. Among them, mitoxantrone, siponimod, and ocrelizumab are superior to other drug options in delaying disease progression (high certainty). Mitoxantrone was the best (with high certainty) for mitigating deterioration (progression of disability). Ocrelizumab performed best on the pre- and post-treatment Timed 25-Foot Walk test (T25FW; low certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.12–1.05). In the 9-Hole Peg Test (9HPT), natalizumab performed the best (high certainty), as did all other agents (RR range: 1.59–1.09). In terms of imaging, IFN-beta-1b performed better on the new T2 hypointense lesion on contrast, before and after treatment (high certainty), while siponimod performed best on the change from baseline in the total volume of lesions on T2-weighted image contrast before and after treatment (high certainty), and sWASO had the highest area under the curve (SUCRA) value (100%). In terms of adverse events (AEs), rituximab (RR 1.01), and laquinimod (RR 1.02) were more effective than the placebo (high certainty). In terms of serious adverse events (SAEs), natalizumab (RR 1.09), and ocrelizumab (RR 1.07) were safer than placebo (high certainty).ConclusionDMTs can effectively control disease progression and reduce disease deterioration during the treatment of PMS.Systematic review registrationhttps://inplasy.com/?s=202320071, identifier: 202320071.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1295770/fullmultiple sclerosisdisease-modifying therapyrandomized controlledocrelizumabnatalizumabrituximab |
spellingShingle | Xin Wu Shixin Wang Tao Xue Xin Tan Jiaxuan Li Zhouqing Chen Zhong Wang Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials Frontiers in Neurology multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy randomized controlled ocrelizumab natalizumab rituximab |
title | Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full | Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_fullStr | Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_short | Disease-modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials |
title_sort | disease modifying therapy in progressive multiple sclerosis a systematic review and network meta analysis of randomized controlled trials |
topic | multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapy randomized controlled ocrelizumab natalizumab rituximab |
url | https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2024.1295770/full |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xinwu diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT shixinwang diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT taoxue diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT xintan diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT jiaxuanli diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhouqingchen diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials AT zhongwang diseasemodifyingtherapyinprogressivemultiplesclerosisasystematicreviewandnetworkmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials |