Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review

The incidence of melanoma in the United States continues to rise. Head and neck melanomas comprise approximately 20% of all primary cutaneous melanomas. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for staging in melanoma. It has a number of advantages, including the addit...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Martin Corsten
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Advocate Aurora Health 2014-01-01
Series:Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
Subjects:
Online Access:http://digitalrepository.aurorahealthcare.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=jpcrr
_version_ 1797934517991768064
author Martin Corsten
author_facet Martin Corsten
author_sort Martin Corsten
collection DOAJ
description The incidence of melanoma in the United States continues to rise. Head and neck melanomas comprise approximately 20% of all primary cutaneous melanomas. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for staging in melanoma. It has a number of advantages, including the addition of prognostic information, accurate staging, and the potential to add completion lymph node dissection (CLND) or adjuvant therapy when indicated. Furthermore, it may allow for the identification of patients who would benefit from inclusion in clinical trials; this advantage may be amplified based on the introduction of novel targeted therapies. SLNB does have some disadvantages in head and neck melanomas. The complex lymphatic drainage and anatomy of the head and neck can result in some technical challenges. SLN positivity rates in head and neck melanoma are lower than for trunk or extremity melanoma; despite this, overall and disease free survival rates are lower in head and neck melanoma. This review examines the literature evidence for the efficacy of SLNB in head and neck melanoma, and in particular attempts to estimate five variables: the likelihood of finding a SLN, the number of SLNs found, the likelihood of a positive SLN, the likelihood of identifying positive non-sentinel lymph nodes on CLND, and the likelihood of recurrence in the neck despite a negative SLNB. Overall, despite the technical challenges inherent in SLNB when applied to head and neck melanoma, it remains a technically feasible and effective procedure in this anatomic site.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T18:00:15Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28b1396b63c34d2ab3b4e187c3d2bce5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2330-0698
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T18:00:15Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Advocate Aurora Health
record_format Article
series Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
spelling doaj.art-28b1396b63c34d2ab3b4e187c3d2bce52023-02-02T15:37:51ZengAdvocate Aurora HealthJournal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews2330-06982014-01-0111273210.17294/2330-0698.1008Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A ReviewMartin Corsten0University of Ottawa, Ottawa, CanadaThe incidence of melanoma in the United States continues to rise. Head and neck melanomas comprise approximately 20% of all primary cutaneous melanomas. Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy (SLNB) has become the standard of care for staging in melanoma. It has a number of advantages, including the addition of prognostic information, accurate staging, and the potential to add completion lymph node dissection (CLND) or adjuvant therapy when indicated. Furthermore, it may allow for the identification of patients who would benefit from inclusion in clinical trials; this advantage may be amplified based on the introduction of novel targeted therapies. SLNB does have some disadvantages in head and neck melanomas. The complex lymphatic drainage and anatomy of the head and neck can result in some technical challenges. SLN positivity rates in head and neck melanoma are lower than for trunk or extremity melanoma; despite this, overall and disease free survival rates are lower in head and neck melanoma. This review examines the literature evidence for the efficacy of SLNB in head and neck melanoma, and in particular attempts to estimate five variables: the likelihood of finding a SLN, the number of SLNs found, the likelihood of a positive SLN, the likelihood of identifying positive non-sentinel lymph nodes on CLND, and the likelihood of recurrence in the neck despite a negative SLNB. Overall, despite the technical challenges inherent in SLNB when applied to head and neck melanoma, it remains a technically feasible and effective procedure in this anatomic site.http://digitalrepository.aurorahealthcare.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=jpcrrmelanomahead and necksentinel lymph node biopsy
spellingShingle Martin Corsten
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
Journal of Patient-Centered Research and Reviews
melanoma
head and neck
sentinel lymph node biopsy
title Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
title_full Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
title_fullStr Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
title_short Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Head and Neck Melanoma: A Review
title_sort sentinel lymph node biopsy in head and neck melanoma a review
topic melanoma
head and neck
sentinel lymph node biopsy
url http://digitalrepository.aurorahealthcare.org/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1008&context=jpcrr
work_keys_str_mv AT martincorsten sentinellymphnodebiopsyinheadandneckmelanomaareview