Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study

Abstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Atul M. Padole, Pallavi Sagar, Sjirk J. Westra, Ruth Lim, Katherine Nimkin, Mannudeep K. Kalra, Michael S. Gee, Madan M. Rehani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2019-09-01
Series:Insights into Imaging
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8
_version_ 1818303559415889920
author Atul M. Padole
Pallavi Sagar
Sjirk J. Westra
Ruth Lim
Katherine Nimkin
Mannudeep K. Kalra
Michael S. Gee
Madan M. Rehani
author_facet Atul M. Padole
Pallavi Sagar
Sjirk J. Westra
Ruth Lim
Katherine Nimkin
Mannudeep K. Kalra
Michael S. Gee
Madan M. Rehani
author_sort Atul M. Padole
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3 for adequate image quality, and 4 depicting higher than needed image quality. Pediatric CT examinations from 30 separate patients were selected, five each for routine chest, routine abdomen, kidney stone, appendicitis, craniosynostosis, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Five board-certified pediatric radiologists independently performed image quality evaluation using the proposed IQSC. The kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver variability. Results All five radiologists gave a score of 3 to two-third (67%) of all CT exams, followed by a score of 4 for 29% of CT exams, and 2 for 4% exams. The median image quality scores for all exams were 3 and the interobserver agreement among five readers (acceptable image quality [scores 3 or 4] vs sub-optimal image quality ([scores 1 and 2]) was moderate to very good (kappa 0.4–1). For all five radiologists, the lesion detection was adequate for all CT exams. Conclusions The image quality scoring criteria covering routine and some clinical indication-based imaging scenarios for pediatric CT examinations has potential to offer a simple and practical tool for assessing image quality with a reasonable degree of interobserver agreement. A more extensive and multi-centric study is recommended to establish wider usefulness of these criteria.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:56:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28bbf140f0bc4c8e9e805d2d114c9783
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1869-4101
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:56:44Z
publishDate 2019-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series Insights into Imaging
spelling doaj.art-28bbf140f0bc4c8e9e805d2d114c97832022-12-21T23:57:26ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012019-09-0110111110.1186/s13244-019-0769-8Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary studyAtul M. Padole0Pallavi Sagar1Sjirk J. Westra2Ruth Lim3Katherine Nimkin4Mannudeep K. Kalra5Michael S. Gee6Madan M. Rehani7Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3 for adequate image quality, and 4 depicting higher than needed image quality. Pediatric CT examinations from 30 separate patients were selected, five each for routine chest, routine abdomen, kidney stone, appendicitis, craniosynostosis, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Five board-certified pediatric radiologists independently performed image quality evaluation using the proposed IQSC. The kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver variability. Results All five radiologists gave a score of 3 to two-third (67%) of all CT exams, followed by a score of 4 for 29% of CT exams, and 2 for 4% exams. The median image quality scores for all exams were 3 and the interobserver agreement among five readers (acceptable image quality [scores 3 or 4] vs sub-optimal image quality ([scores 1 and 2]) was moderate to very good (kappa 0.4–1). For all five radiologists, the lesion detection was adequate for all CT exams. Conclusions The image quality scoring criteria covering routine and some clinical indication-based imaging scenarios for pediatric CT examinations has potential to offer a simple and practical tool for assessing image quality with a reasonable degree of interobserver agreement. A more extensive and multi-centric study is recommended to establish wider usefulness of these criteria.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8Pediatric CTClinical indicationsImage quality scoring criteriaRadiation protectionRadiation dose optimization
spellingShingle Atul M. Padole
Pallavi Sagar
Sjirk J. Westra
Ruth Lim
Katherine Nimkin
Mannudeep K. Kalra
Michael S. Gee
Madan M. Rehani
Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
Insights into Imaging
Pediatric CT
Clinical indications
Image quality scoring criteria
Radiation protection
Radiation dose optimization
title Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
title_full Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
title_fullStr Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
title_full_unstemmed Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
title_short Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
title_sort development and validation of image quality scoring criteria iqsc for pediatric ct a preliminary study
topic Pediatric CT
Clinical indications
Image quality scoring criteria
Radiation protection
Radiation dose optimization
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8
work_keys_str_mv AT atulmpadole developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT pallavisagar developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT sjirkjwestra developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT ruthlim developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT katherinenimkin developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT mannudeepkkalra developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT michaelsgee developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy
AT madanmrehani developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy