Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study
Abstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2019-09-01
|
Series: | Insights into Imaging |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8 |
_version_ | 1818303559415889920 |
---|---|
author | Atul M. Padole Pallavi Sagar Sjirk J. Westra Ruth Lim Katherine Nimkin Mannudeep K. Kalra Michael S. Gee Madan M. Rehani |
author_facet | Atul M. Padole Pallavi Sagar Sjirk J. Westra Ruth Lim Katherine Nimkin Mannudeep K. Kalra Michael S. Gee Madan M. Rehani |
author_sort | Atul M. Padole |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3 for adequate image quality, and 4 depicting higher than needed image quality. Pediatric CT examinations from 30 separate patients were selected, five each for routine chest, routine abdomen, kidney stone, appendicitis, craniosynostosis, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Five board-certified pediatric radiologists independently performed image quality evaluation using the proposed IQSC. The kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver variability. Results All five radiologists gave a score of 3 to two-third (67%) of all CT exams, followed by a score of 4 for 29% of CT exams, and 2 for 4% exams. The median image quality scores for all exams were 3 and the interobserver agreement among five readers (acceptable image quality [scores 3 or 4] vs sub-optimal image quality ([scores 1 and 2]) was moderate to very good (kappa 0.4–1). For all five radiologists, the lesion detection was adequate for all CT exams. Conclusions The image quality scoring criteria covering routine and some clinical indication-based imaging scenarios for pediatric CT examinations has potential to offer a simple and practical tool for assessing image quality with a reasonable degree of interobserver agreement. A more extensive and multi-centric study is recommended to establish wider usefulness of these criteria. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:56:44Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-28bbf140f0bc4c8e9e805d2d114c9783 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1869-4101 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-13T05:56:44Z |
publishDate | 2019-09-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | Insights into Imaging |
spelling | doaj.art-28bbf140f0bc4c8e9e805d2d114c97832022-12-21T23:57:26ZengSpringerOpenInsights into Imaging1869-41012019-09-0110111110.1186/s13244-019-0769-8Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary studyAtul M. Padole0Pallavi Sagar1Sjirk J. Westra2Ruth Lim3Katherine Nimkin4Mannudeep K. Kalra5Michael S. Gee6Madan M. Rehani7Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolDepartment of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical SchoolAbstract Objective To develop and assess the value and limitations of an image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT exams. Methods IQSC was developed for subjective assessment of image quality using the scoring scale from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating desired anatomy or features not seen, 3 for adequate image quality, and 4 depicting higher than needed image quality. Pediatric CT examinations from 30 separate patients were selected, five each for routine chest, routine abdomen, kidney stone, appendicitis, craniosynostosis, and ventriculoperitoneal (VP) shunt. Five board-certified pediatric radiologists independently performed image quality evaluation using the proposed IQSC. The kappa statistics were used to assess the interobserver variability. Results All five radiologists gave a score of 3 to two-third (67%) of all CT exams, followed by a score of 4 for 29% of CT exams, and 2 for 4% exams. The median image quality scores for all exams were 3 and the interobserver agreement among five readers (acceptable image quality [scores 3 or 4] vs sub-optimal image quality ([scores 1 and 2]) was moderate to very good (kappa 0.4–1). For all five radiologists, the lesion detection was adequate for all CT exams. Conclusions The image quality scoring criteria covering routine and some clinical indication-based imaging scenarios for pediatric CT examinations has potential to offer a simple and practical tool for assessing image quality with a reasonable degree of interobserver agreement. A more extensive and multi-centric study is recommended to establish wider usefulness of these criteria.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8Pediatric CTClinical indicationsImage quality scoring criteriaRadiation protectionRadiation dose optimization |
spellingShingle | Atul M. Padole Pallavi Sagar Sjirk J. Westra Ruth Lim Katherine Nimkin Mannudeep K. Kalra Michael S. Gee Madan M. Rehani Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study Insights into Imaging Pediatric CT Clinical indications Image quality scoring criteria Radiation protection Radiation dose optimization |
title | Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study |
title_full | Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study |
title_short | Development and validation of image quality scoring criteria (IQSC) for pediatric CT: a preliminary study |
title_sort | development and validation of image quality scoring criteria iqsc for pediatric ct a preliminary study |
topic | Pediatric CT Clinical indications Image quality scoring criteria Radiation protection Radiation dose optimization |
url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13244-019-0769-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT atulmpadole developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT pallavisagar developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT sjirkjwestra developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT ruthlim developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT katherinenimkin developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT mannudeepkkalra developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT michaelsgee developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy AT madanmrehani developmentandvalidationofimagequalityscoringcriteriaiqscforpediatricctapreliminarystudy |