Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: Heart failure hospitalization (hHF) with dipeptyl-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) remains at the center stage since the publication of Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) in 2013 s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Awadhesh Kumar Singh, Ritu Singh
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2019-01-01
Series:Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ijem.in/article.asp?issn=2230-8210;year=2019;volume=23;issue=1;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=Singh
_version_ 1818408701246046208
author Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Ritu Singh
author_facet Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Ritu Singh
author_sort Awadhesh Kumar Singh
collection DOAJ
description Background: Heart failure hospitalization (hHF) with dipeptyl-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) remains at the center stage since the publication of Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) in 2013 showing significant increase with saxagliptin, compared to placebo. This outcome led to additional label of hHF to both saxagliptin and alogliptin in April 2016 and eventual labelling of hHF to all the four approved DPP-4Is in United States in August 2017, by US Food Drug Administration. To note, neither Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), nor Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study with Linagliptin (CARMELINA), showed any signals of hHF with these two agents. These developments have seriously generated an uncertainty among clinicians with regards to hHF effect of DPP-4Is in type 2 diabetic patients with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Aims and Objectives: We systematically searched the database of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International conference presentation from the inception up to October 25, 2018 using MeSH and specific key words. We retrieved all those studies that explicitly looked for hHF as a prespecified end point and were conducted for ≥52 weeks. Subsequently, we conducted the meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis software Version 3, using different sensitivity analysis to study the effect of DPP-4Is on hHF in both dedicated CV outcome trials as well as randomized controlled trials. Results: The meta-analysis of four exclusive dedicated CV outcome trials (N = 43,522) did not find significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors (Fixed model Relative Risk [RR] 1.06; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.96-1.17; P = 0.25; I2: 53.95%, tau2: 0.012, P = 0.089). Meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that explicitly looked for hHF for ≥52 weeks (N = 48,199) also did not show any significant increase in hHF (fixed model peto odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.95–1.15, P = 0.36; I2: 43.74%, tau2: 0.016, P = 0.10). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests no significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors, although a nonsignificant heterogeneity across the trials might limit this observation.
first_indexed 2024-12-14T09:47:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28c196005e054e909e23d5d1629ec520
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2230-8210
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-14T09:47:55Z
publishDate 2019-01-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
spelling doaj.art-28c196005e054e909e23d5d1629ec5202022-12-21T23:07:35ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsIndian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism2230-82102019-01-0123112813310.4103/ijem.IJEM_613_18Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trialsAwadhesh Kumar SinghRitu SinghBackground: Heart failure hospitalization (hHF) with dipeptyl-dipeptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP-4Is) remains at the center stage since the publication of Saxagliptin Assessment of Vascular Outcomes Recorded in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus – Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (SAVOR-TIMI) in 2013 showing significant increase with saxagliptin, compared to placebo. This outcome led to additional label of hHF to both saxagliptin and alogliptin in April 2016 and eventual labelling of hHF to all the four approved DPP-4Is in United States in August 2017, by US Food Drug Administration. To note, neither Trial Evaluating Cardiovascular Outcomes with Sitagliptin (TECOS), nor Cardiovascular and Renal Microvascular Outcome Study with Linagliptin (CARMELINA), showed any signals of hHF with these two agents. These developments have seriously generated an uncertainty among clinicians with regards to hHF effect of DPP-4Is in type 2 diabetic patients with high risk of cardiovascular (CV) disease. Aims and Objectives: We systematically searched the database of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International conference presentation from the inception up to October 25, 2018 using MeSH and specific key words. We retrieved all those studies that explicitly looked for hHF as a prespecified end point and were conducted for ≥52 weeks. Subsequently, we conducted the meta-analysis using comprehensive meta-analysis software Version 3, using different sensitivity analysis to study the effect of DPP-4Is on hHF in both dedicated CV outcome trials as well as randomized controlled trials. Results: The meta-analysis of four exclusive dedicated CV outcome trials (N = 43,522) did not find significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors (Fixed model Relative Risk [RR] 1.06; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.96-1.17; P = 0.25; I2: 53.95%, tau2: 0.012, P = 0.089). Meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials that explicitly looked for hHF for ≥52 weeks (N = 48,199) also did not show any significant increase in hHF (fixed model peto odds ratio 1.05; 95% CI 0.95–1.15, P = 0.36; I2: 43.74%, tau2: 0.016, P = 0.10). Conclusions: This meta-analysis suggests no significant increase in hHF with DPP-4 inhibitors, although a nonsignificant heterogeneity across the trials might limit this observation.http://www.ijem.in/article.asp?issn=2230-8210;year=2019;volume=23;issue=1;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=Singhcardiovascular outcomesdpp-4 inhibitorsgliptinsheart failureheart failure hospitalization
spellingShingle Awadhesh Kumar Singh
Ritu Singh
Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
Indian Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism
cardiovascular outcomes
dpp-4 inhibitors
gliptins
heart failure
heart failure hospitalization
title Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_fullStr Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_short Heart failure hospitalization with DPP-4 inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
title_sort heart failure hospitalization with dpp 4 inhibitors a systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic cardiovascular outcomes
dpp-4 inhibitors
gliptins
heart failure
heart failure hospitalization
url http://www.ijem.in/article.asp?issn=2230-8210;year=2019;volume=23;issue=1;spage=128;epage=133;aulast=Singh
work_keys_str_mv AT awadheshkumarsingh heartfailurehospitalizationwithdpp4inhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT ritusingh heartfailurehospitalizationwithdpp4inhibitorsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials