XRF Analysis of mineralogical matrix effects and differences between pulverized and fused ferromanganese slag

Determination and analysis is only as good as the sample preparation that preceded it. Even the most sophisticated analysis is worthless if it follows sloppy sampling and poor preparation. Whether one does plasma emission, infrared or X-ray fluorescence or another spectroscopic technique, it is esse...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: VALENTINA ZIVANOVIC
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Association of the Chemical Engineers of Serbia 2011-06-01
Series:Chemical Industry and Chemical Engineering Quarterly
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ache.org.rs/CICEQ/2011/No2/CICEQ_Vol17_%20No2_pp231-237_Apr-Jun_2011.pdf
Description
Summary:Determination and analysis is only as good as the sample preparation that preceded it. Even the most sophisticated analysis is worthless if it follows sloppy sampling and poor preparation. Whether one does plasma emission, infrared or X-ray fluorescence or another spectroscopic technique, it is essential to get reproducible and accurate analysis. This paper shows the effect of mineralogical matrix differences in quantitative measurements by XRF of the main elements (Al, Ca, Mg, Si, Mn and K as oxides) of ferromanganese alloy slag. Fused and pulverized slag show a significant difference in XRF microstructure, micro heterogeneity and mineralogy although the results of measurements between pulverized and fused slag, expressed as a percentage of the main elements, is not different. Other analytical techniques such as ICP-OES and classical gravimetric and titrimetric were also used for checking the XRF calibration accuracy
ISSN:1451-9372