Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials

ObjectiveMotor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) usin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Petyo Nikolov, Shady S. Hassan, Alfons Schnitzler, Stefan J. Groiss
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-04-01
Series:Frontiers in Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258/full
_version_ 1818728071724793856
author Petyo Nikolov
Petyo Nikolov
Shady S. Hassan
Shady S. Hassan
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Stefan J. Groiss
Stefan J. Groiss
author_facet Petyo Nikolov
Petyo Nikolov
Shady S. Hassan
Shady S. Hassan
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Stefan J. Groiss
Stefan J. Groiss
author_sort Petyo Nikolov
collection DOAJ
description ObjectiveMotor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings.Materials and MethodsTwenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz.ResultsMEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR.ConclusionThe reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR.SignificanceOur findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP.
first_indexed 2024-12-17T22:24:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28d37d90e654448788d37c23851c7335
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-453X
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-17T22:24:10Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-28d37d90e654448788d37c23851c73352022-12-21T21:30:24ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Neuroscience1662-453X2021-04-011510.3389/fnins.2021.665258665258Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked PotentialsPetyo Nikolov0Petyo Nikolov1Shady S. Hassan2Shady S. Hassan3Alfons Schnitzler4Alfons Schnitzler5Stefan J. Groiss6Stefan J. Groiss7Institute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Assiut University Hospital, Assiut, EgyptInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyInstitute of Clinical Neuroscience and Medical Psychology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyDepartment of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, GermanyObjectiveMotor evoked potentials (MEP), obtained by transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) are a common tool in clinical research and diagnostic. Nevertheless, reports regarding the influence of filter settings on MEP are sparse. Here, we compared MEP amplitudes and signal to noise ratio (SNR) using multiple high pass filter (HPF) and notch filter settings.Materials and MethodsTwenty healthy subjects were enrolled in the study. Recruitment curves were obtained with HPF settings varied at 10, 20, 50, and 100 Hz. The four HPF settings were tested both with and without 50 Hz active notch filter. Low pass filter was kept constant at 5 kHz.ResultsMEP amplitudes with HPF at 10 and 20 Hz were significantly higher than at 100 Hz, regardless of the notch filter. However, SNR did not differ among HPF settings. An active notch filter significantly improved SNR.ConclusionThe reduction in MEP amplitudes with HPF above 20 Hz may be due to noise reduction, since the different HPF conditions did not alter SNR. Thus, higher HPF above 50 Hz may be an option to reduce noise, the use of a notch filter may even improve SNR.SignificanceOur findings are relevant for the selection of filter settings and might be of importance to any researcher who utilizes TMS-MEP.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258/fulltranscramial magnetic stimulationmotor evoked potentialhigh pass filternotch filterartifacts
spellingShingle Petyo Nikolov
Petyo Nikolov
Shady S. Hassan
Shady S. Hassan
Alfons Schnitzler
Alfons Schnitzler
Stefan J. Groiss
Stefan J. Groiss
Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
Frontiers in Neuroscience
transcramial magnetic stimulation
motor evoked potential
high pass filter
notch filter
artifacts
title Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_full Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_fullStr Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_full_unstemmed Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_short Influence of High Pass Filter Settings on Motor Evoked Potentials
title_sort influence of high pass filter settings on motor evoked potentials
topic transcramial magnetic stimulation
motor evoked potential
high pass filter
notch filter
artifacts
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnins.2021.665258/full
work_keys_str_mv AT petyonikolov influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT petyonikolov influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT shadyshassan influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT shadyshassan influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT alfonsschnitzler influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT alfonsschnitzler influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT stefanjgroiss influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials
AT stefanjgroiss influenceofhighpassfiltersettingsonmotorevokedpotentials