Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape

Vaping rates among Canadian youth are significantly higher compared to adults. While it is acknowledged that various personal and socio-environmental factors influence the risk of school-aged youth for vaping uptake, we don’t know which known behavior change factors are most influential, for whom, a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Laura Struik, Kyla Christianson, Shaheer Khan, Youjin Yang, Saige-Taylor Werstuik, Sarah Dow-Fleisner, Shelly Ben-David
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Addictive Behaviors Reports
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000317
_version_ 1797390402750251008
author Laura Struik
Kyla Christianson
Shaheer Khan
Youjin Yang
Saige-Taylor Werstuik
Sarah Dow-Fleisner
Shelly Ben-David
author_facet Laura Struik
Kyla Christianson
Shaheer Khan
Youjin Yang
Saige-Taylor Werstuik
Sarah Dow-Fleisner
Shelly Ben-David
author_sort Laura Struik
collection DOAJ
description Vaping rates among Canadian youth are significantly higher compared to adults. While it is acknowledged that various personal and socio-environmental factors influence the risk of school-aged youth for vaping uptake, we don’t know which known behavior change factors are most influential, for whom, and how. The Unified Theory of Behavior (UTB) brings together theoretically-based behavior change factors that influence health risk decision making. We aimed to use this framework to study the factors that influence decision making around vaping among school-aged youth. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 youth aged 12 to 18 who were either vaped or didn't vape. We employed a collaborative and directed content analysis approach and the UTB constructs served as the coding framework for analysis. Gender differences were explored in the analysis. We found that multiple intersecting factors play a significant role in youth decision making to vape. Youth who vaped and those who did not vape reported similar mediating determinants that either reinforced or challenged their decision-making, such as easy access to vaping, constant exposure to vaping, and the temptation of flavors. Youth who didn't vape reported individual determinants that strengthened their intentions to not vape, including more negative behavioral beliefs (e.g., vaping is harmful) and normative beliefs (e.g., family disapproves), and strong self-efficacy (e.g. self-confidence). Youth who did vape, however, reported individual determinants that supported their intentions to vape, such as social identity, coolness, and peer endorsement. The findings revealed cohesion across multiple determinants, suggesting that consideration of multiple determinents when developing prevention messages would be beneficial for reaching youth.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:11:11Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28d5b44194244af1867d65d3fbfe1a83
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-8532
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:11:11Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Addictive Behaviors Reports
spelling doaj.art-28d5b44194244af1867d65d3fbfe1a832023-12-15T07:24:55ZengElsevierAddictive Behaviors Reports2352-85322023-12-0118100509Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vapeLaura Struik0Kyla Christianson1Shaheer Khan2Youjin Yang3Saige-Taylor Werstuik4Sarah Dow-Fleisner5Shelly Ben-David6School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada; Corresponding author at: University of British Columbia Okanagan, 1628 Dickson Ave, Landmark 4 - 609, Kelowna, BC V1Y 9X1, Canada.School of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaInterdisciplinary Studies, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaSchool of Nursing, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaInterdisciplinary Studies, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaSchool of Social Work, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaSchool of Social Work, Faculty of Health and Social Development, University of British Columbia Okanagan, Kelowna, British Columbia, CanadaVaping rates among Canadian youth are significantly higher compared to adults. While it is acknowledged that various personal and socio-environmental factors influence the risk of school-aged youth for vaping uptake, we don’t know which known behavior change factors are most influential, for whom, and how. The Unified Theory of Behavior (UTB) brings together theoretically-based behavior change factors that influence health risk decision making. We aimed to use this framework to study the factors that influence decision making around vaping among school-aged youth. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 25 youth aged 12 to 18 who were either vaped or didn't vape. We employed a collaborative and directed content analysis approach and the UTB constructs served as the coding framework for analysis. Gender differences were explored in the analysis. We found that multiple intersecting factors play a significant role in youth decision making to vape. Youth who vaped and those who did not vape reported similar mediating determinants that either reinforced or challenged their decision-making, such as easy access to vaping, constant exposure to vaping, and the temptation of flavors. Youth who didn't vape reported individual determinants that strengthened their intentions to not vape, including more negative behavioral beliefs (e.g., vaping is harmful) and normative beliefs (e.g., family disapproves), and strong self-efficacy (e.g. self-confidence). Youth who did vape, however, reported individual determinants that supported their intentions to vape, such as social identity, coolness, and peer endorsement. The findings revealed cohesion across multiple determinants, suggesting that consideration of multiple determinents when developing prevention messages would be beneficial for reaching youth.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000317VapingE-cigaretteYouthAdolescenceQualitativeBehaviour change
spellingShingle Laura Struik
Kyla Christianson
Shaheer Khan
Youjin Yang
Saige-Taylor Werstuik
Sarah Dow-Fleisner
Shelly Ben-David
Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
Addictive Behaviors Reports
Vaping
E-cigarette
Youth
Adolescence
Qualitative
Behaviour change
title Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
title_full Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
title_fullStr Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
title_full_unstemmed Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
title_short Factors that influence decision-making among youth who vape and youth who don’t vape
title_sort factors that influence decision making among youth who vape and youth who don t vape
topic Vaping
E-cigarette
Youth
Adolescence
Qualitative
Behaviour change
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352853223000317
work_keys_str_mv AT laurastruik factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT kylachristianson factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT shaheerkhan factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT youjinyang factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT saigetaylorwerstuik factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT sarahdowfleisner factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape
AT shellybendavid factorsthatinfluencedecisionmakingamongyouthwhovapeandyouthwhodontvape