A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.

Common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) is distributed widely throughout the world with various ecotypes. This research compares the functional traits and biomass allocation patterns of two contrasting reed ecotypes. Twelve pairs of aquatic and terrestrial reed samples were collect...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liping Li, Wenxuan Han, Niels Thevs, Xiuhong Jia, Chengjun Ji, Dongmei Jin, Ping He, Armin O Schmitt, Giuseppe Tommaso Cirella, Stefan Zerbe
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2014-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3929632?pdf=render
_version_ 1818478708951875584
author Liping Li
Wenxuan Han
Niels Thevs
Xiuhong Jia
Chengjun Ji
Dongmei Jin
Ping He
Armin O Schmitt
Giuseppe Tommaso Cirella
Stefan Zerbe
author_facet Liping Li
Wenxuan Han
Niels Thevs
Xiuhong Jia
Chengjun Ji
Dongmei Jin
Ping He
Armin O Schmitt
Giuseppe Tommaso Cirella
Stefan Zerbe
author_sort Liping Li
collection DOAJ
description Common reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) is distributed widely throughout the world with various ecotypes. This research compares the functional traits and biomass allocation patterns of two contrasting reed ecotypes. Twelve pairs of aquatic and terrestrial reed samples were collected in northern China. Significant differences in functional traits between the two reed ecotypes were observed, while biomass allocation patterns of reed organs did not differ significantly except for at the root. The dry matter content (DMC) in the whole of the reed plant, leaf, root, and rhizome was higher; while the specific leaf area (SLA) and specific root length (SRL) were lower in terrestrial versus aquatic reed. The biomass allocation in organs of the two forms of reed was isometric, only root in the terrestrial habitat increased faster with an increase in the whole plant biomass. It can be affirmed that aquatic and terrestrial reed that adapt to different environments generally has distinct leaf and root functional traits but isometric biomass allocation patterns. This suggests different resource acquisition strategies: (1) aquatic reed grows faster with high SLA and SRL and is more responsive to the environment, while (2) terrestrial reed with high DMC grows slower and is less responsive to the adverse environment (e.g. dry soil conditions).
first_indexed 2024-12-10T09:51:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28e2a39a988848e88a993d0fc08db59d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T09:51:24Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-28e2a39a988848e88a993d0fc08db59d2022-12-22T01:53:40ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-0192e8906310.1371/journal.pone.0089063A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.Liping LiWenxuan HanNiels ThevsXiuhong JiaChengjun JiDongmei JinPing HeArmin O SchmittGiuseppe Tommaso CirellaStefan ZerbeCommon reed (Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. ex Steud.) is distributed widely throughout the world with various ecotypes. This research compares the functional traits and biomass allocation patterns of two contrasting reed ecotypes. Twelve pairs of aquatic and terrestrial reed samples were collected in northern China. Significant differences in functional traits between the two reed ecotypes were observed, while biomass allocation patterns of reed organs did not differ significantly except for at the root. The dry matter content (DMC) in the whole of the reed plant, leaf, root, and rhizome was higher; while the specific leaf area (SLA) and specific root length (SRL) were lower in terrestrial versus aquatic reed. The biomass allocation in organs of the two forms of reed was isometric, only root in the terrestrial habitat increased faster with an increase in the whole plant biomass. It can be affirmed that aquatic and terrestrial reed that adapt to different environments generally has distinct leaf and root functional traits but isometric biomass allocation patterns. This suggests different resource acquisition strategies: (1) aquatic reed grows faster with high SLA and SRL and is more responsive to the environment, while (2) terrestrial reed with high DMC grows slower and is less responsive to the adverse environment (e.g. dry soil conditions).http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3929632?pdf=render
spellingShingle Liping Li
Wenxuan Han
Niels Thevs
Xiuhong Jia
Chengjun Ji
Dongmei Jin
Ping He
Armin O Schmitt
Giuseppe Tommaso Cirella
Stefan Zerbe
A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
PLoS ONE
title A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
title_full A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
title_fullStr A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
title_short A comparison of the functional traits of common reed (Phragmites australis) in northern China: aquatic vs. terrestrial ecotypes.
title_sort comparison of the functional traits of common reed phragmites australis in northern china aquatic vs terrestrial ecotypes
url http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3929632?pdf=render
work_keys_str_mv AT lipingli acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT wenxuanhan acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT nielsthevs acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT xiuhongjia acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT chengjunji acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT dongmeijin acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT pinghe acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT arminoschmitt acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT giuseppetommasocirella acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT stefanzerbe acomparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT lipingli comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT wenxuanhan comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT nielsthevs comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT xiuhongjia comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT chengjunji comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT dongmeijin comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT pinghe comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT arminoschmitt comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT giuseppetommasocirella comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes
AT stefanzerbe comparisonofthefunctionaltraitsofcommonreedphragmitesaustralisinnorthernchinaaquaticvsterrestrialecotypes