The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, an...
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Universitas Islam Riau (UIR) Press
2023-10-01
|
Series: | Journal of Earth Energy Engineering |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097 |
_version_ | 1797360369489936384 |
---|---|
author | Sayen Girsang Deny Fatryanto Rohima Sera Afifah |
author_facet | Sayen Girsang Deny Fatryanto Rohima Sera Afifah |
author_sort | Sayen Girsang |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, and to analyze the best scenario in term of technical objective.
This study was carried out using E300 reservoir simulator. The increase in recovery and CO2 storage were observed throught the parameters of recovery factor and CO2 storage capacity, while the determination of the best scenario in term of technical objective was observed using the parameters of objective function. This study was carried out in 3 different scenarios, which were the injection of 100% CO2, 60% CO2and 40% water, and 40% CO2 and 60% water
Based on the observation, it was founded that third scenario with the GWR of 40:60 resulted the highest cumulative production and recovery factor with the value reaching 14.1 milliom m3 and 67.4%. Meanwhile the second scenario with the GWR of 60:40 has the highest CO2 storage capacity of 3 billion Sm3 CO2. The second scenario has the best performance in term of technical objective with the value of objective function reaching 0.45.
|
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:38:31Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-28ebe42fe21b4f748f00f411a07dfd54 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2301-8097 2540-9352 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T15:38:31Z |
publishDate | 2023-10-01 |
publisher | Universitas Islam Riau (UIR) Press |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Earth Energy Engineering |
spelling | doaj.art-28ebe42fe21b4f748f00f411a07dfd542024-01-09T16:46:01ZengUniversitas Islam Riau (UIR) PressJournal of Earth Energy Engineering2301-80972540-93522023-10-0111310.25299/jeee.2022.6097The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North SeaSayen Girsang0Deny Fatryanto1Rohima Sera Afifah2STT MIGAS BalikpapanSekolah Tinggi Teknologi Minyak dan Gas Bumi BalikpapanSekolah Tinggi Teknologi Minyak dan Gas Bumi Balikpapan CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, and to analyze the best scenario in term of technical objective. This study was carried out using E300 reservoir simulator. The increase in recovery and CO2 storage were observed throught the parameters of recovery factor and CO2 storage capacity, while the determination of the best scenario in term of technical objective was observed using the parameters of objective function. This study was carried out in 3 different scenarios, which were the injection of 100% CO2, 60% CO2and 40% water, and 40% CO2 and 60% water Based on the observation, it was founded that third scenario with the GWR of 40:60 resulted the highest cumulative production and recovery factor with the value reaching 14.1 milliom m3 and 67.4%. Meanwhile the second scenario with the GWR of 60:40 has the highest CO2 storage capacity of 3 billion Sm3 CO2. The second scenario has the best performance in term of technical objective with the value of objective function reaching 0.45. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function |
spellingShingle | Sayen Girsang Deny Fatryanto Rohima Sera Afifah The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea Journal of Earth Energy Engineering CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function |
title | The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea |
title_full | The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea |
title_fullStr | The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea |
title_short | The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea |
title_sort | effect of different gas water ratio on recovery factor and co2 storage capacity in water alternating gas injection a case study v field development north sea |
topic | CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function |
url | https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sayengirsang theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea AT denyfatryanto theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea AT rohimaseraafifah theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea AT sayengirsang effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea AT denyfatryanto effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea AT rohimaseraafifah effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea |