The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea

CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sayen Girsang, Deny Fatryanto, Rohima Sera Afifah
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universitas Islam Riau (UIR) Press 2023-10-01
Series:Journal of Earth Energy Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097
_version_ 1797360369489936384
author Sayen Girsang
Deny Fatryanto
Rohima Sera Afifah
author_facet Sayen Girsang
Deny Fatryanto
Rohima Sera Afifah
author_sort Sayen Girsang
collection DOAJ
description CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, and to analyze the best scenario in term of technical objective. This study was carried out using E300 reservoir simulator. The increase in recovery and CO2 storage were observed throught the parameters of recovery factor and CO2 storage capacity, while the determination of the best scenario in term of technical objective was observed using the parameters of objective function. This study was carried out in 3 different scenarios, which were the injection of 100% CO2, 60% CO2and 40% water, and 40% CO2 and 60% water Based on the observation, it was founded that third scenario with the GWR of 40:60 resulted the highest cumulative production and recovery factor with the value reaching 14.1 milliom m3 and 67.4%. Meanwhile the second scenario with the GWR of 60:40 has the highest CO2 storage capacity of 3 billion Sm3 CO2. The second scenario has the best performance in term of technical objective with the value of objective function reaching 0.45.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T15:38:31Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28ebe42fe21b4f748f00f411a07dfd54
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2301-8097
2540-9352
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T15:38:31Z
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Universitas Islam Riau (UIR) Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Earth Energy Engineering
spelling doaj.art-28ebe42fe21b4f748f00f411a07dfd542024-01-09T16:46:01ZengUniversitas Islam Riau (UIR) PressJournal of Earth Energy Engineering2301-80972540-93522023-10-0111310.25299/jeee.2022.6097The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North SeaSayen Girsang0Deny Fatryanto1Rohima Sera Afifah2STT MIGAS BalikpapanSekolah Tinggi Teknologi Minyak dan Gas Bumi BalikpapanSekolah Tinggi Teknologi Minyak dan Gas Bumi Balikpapan CO2 injection is one of the Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) methods. In this study Water alternating gas (WAG) CO2 injection method was used to obain the maximum sweep efficiency. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of gas water ratio (GWR) value on recovery and CO2 storage capacity, and to analyze the best scenario in term of technical objective. This study was carried out using E300 reservoir simulator. The increase in recovery and CO2 storage were observed throught the parameters of recovery factor and CO2 storage capacity, while the determination of the best scenario in term of technical objective was observed using the parameters of objective function. This study was carried out in 3 different scenarios, which were the injection of 100% CO2, 60% CO2and 40% water, and 40% CO2 and 60% water Based on the observation, it was founded that third scenario with the GWR of 40:60 resulted the highest cumulative production and recovery factor with the value reaching 14.1 milliom m3 and 67.4%. Meanwhile the second scenario with the GWR of 60:40 has the highest CO2 storage capacity of 3 billion Sm3 CO2. The second scenario has the best performance in term of technical objective with the value of objective function reaching 0.45. https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function
spellingShingle Sayen Girsang
Deny Fatryanto
Rohima Sera Afifah
The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
Journal of Earth Energy Engineering
CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function
title The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
title_full The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
title_fullStr The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
title_short The Effect of Different Gas Water Ratio on Recovery Factor and CO2 Storage Capacity in Water Alternating Gas Injection. A Case Study: “V” Field Development, North Sea
title_sort effect of different gas water ratio on recovery factor and co2 storage capacity in water alternating gas injection a case study v field development north sea
topic CO2 injection, Enhanced Oil Recovery, Water Alternating Gas, Gas Water Ratio, CO2 storage capacity, Objective Function
url https://journal.uir.ac.id/index.php/JEEE/article/view/6097
work_keys_str_mv AT sayengirsang theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea
AT denyfatryanto theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea
AT rohimaseraafifah theeffectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea
AT sayengirsang effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea
AT denyfatryanto effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea
AT rohimaseraafifah effectofdifferentgaswaterratioonrecoveryfactorandco2storagecapacityinwateralternatinggasinjectionacasestudyvfielddevelopmentnorthsea