Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation

AIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before ope...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hong-Zhi Yin
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) 2019-04-01
Series:Guoji Yanke Zazhi
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdf
_version_ 1819052892440494080
author Hong-Zhi Yin
author_facet Hong-Zhi Yin
author_sort Hong-Zhi Yin
collection DOAJ
description AIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before operation with more than five kinds of instruments respectively, white to white(WTW)were examined with Wavelight, IOL-master, LS900 and gauge, angle to angle(ATA)with AS-OCT. Then the size of ICL was calculated based on the value of gauge. The vault of ICL was examined with OCT 3mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: WTW was(12.45±0.73, 11.96±0.39, 11.92±0.36, 11.49±0.30)mm measured by Wavelight, IOL-Master, LS900 and gauge respectively, ATA was(11.80±0.44)mm with AS-OCT. The value of gauge was the smallest one among them(all <i>P</i><0.01). Among four instruments, there was no statistical difference between LS900 and AS-OCT(<i>P</i>=0.098), they can instead of each other; there were differences among other instruments(<i>P</i><0.01). The size of ICL based on gauge was(12.77±0.37)mm. The vault of ICL is(537.41±181.22)μm 3mo after implantation obtained by OCT.<p>CONCLUSION: Gauge is ideal tool for measuring corneal diameter, it cannot be instead. Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900 and AS-OCT can be taken as reference.
first_indexed 2024-12-21T12:27:03Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28ee1147145340c88203a8305013b8a2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1672-5123
1672-5123
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-21T12:27:03Z
publishDate 2019-04-01
publisher Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
record_format Article
series Guoji Yanke Zazhi
spelling doaj.art-28ee1147145340c88203a8305013b8a22022-12-21T19:04:08ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232019-04-0119470170310.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.4.41Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantationHong-Zhi Yin0Department of Ming Vision Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, ChinaAIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before operation with more than five kinds of instruments respectively, white to white(WTW)were examined with Wavelight, IOL-master, LS900 and gauge, angle to angle(ATA)with AS-OCT. Then the size of ICL was calculated based on the value of gauge. The vault of ICL was examined with OCT 3mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: WTW was(12.45±0.73, 11.96±0.39, 11.92±0.36, 11.49±0.30)mm measured by Wavelight, IOL-Master, LS900 and gauge respectively, ATA was(11.80±0.44)mm with AS-OCT. The value of gauge was the smallest one among them(all <i>P</i><0.01). Among four instruments, there was no statistical difference between LS900 and AS-OCT(<i>P</i>=0.098), they can instead of each other; there were differences among other instruments(<i>P</i><0.01). The size of ICL based on gauge was(12.77±0.37)mm. The vault of ICL is(537.41±181.22)μm 3mo after implantation obtained by OCT.<p>CONCLUSION: Gauge is ideal tool for measuring corneal diameter, it cannot be instead. Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900 and AS-OCT can be taken as reference.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdfWTWICL V4cIOL MasterLS900WavelightAS-OCT
spellingShingle Hong-Zhi Yin
Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
Guoji Yanke Zazhi
WTW
ICL V4c
IOL Master
LS900
Wavelight
AS-OCT
title Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
title_full Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
title_fullStr Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
title_full_unstemmed Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
title_short Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
title_sort comparision the differences of wtw obtained by wavelight iol master ls900 as oct and gauge before icl implantation
topic WTW
ICL V4c
IOL Master
LS900
Wavelight
AS-OCT
url http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT hongzhiyin comparisionthedifferencesofwtwobtainedbywavelightiolmasterls900asoctandgaugebeforeiclimplantation