Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation
AIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before ope...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)
2019-04-01
|
Series: | Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdf |
_version_ | 1819052892440494080 |
---|---|
author | Hong-Zhi Yin |
author_facet | Hong-Zhi Yin |
author_sort | Hong-Zhi Yin |
collection | DOAJ |
description | AIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before operation with more than five kinds of instruments respectively, white to white(WTW)were examined with Wavelight, IOL-master, LS900 and gauge, angle to angle(ATA)with AS-OCT. Then the size of ICL was calculated based on the value of gauge. The vault of ICL was examined with OCT 3mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: WTW was(12.45±0.73, 11.96±0.39, 11.92±0.36, 11.49±0.30)mm measured by Wavelight, IOL-Master, LS900 and gauge respectively, ATA was(11.80±0.44)mm with AS-OCT. The value of gauge was the smallest one among them(all <i>P</i><0.01). Among four instruments, there was no statistical difference between LS900 and AS-OCT(<i>P</i>=0.098), they can instead of each other; there were differences among other instruments(<i>P</i><0.01). The size of ICL based on gauge was(12.77±0.37)mm. The vault of ICL is(537.41±181.22)μm 3mo after implantation obtained by OCT.<p>CONCLUSION: Gauge is ideal tool for measuring corneal diameter, it cannot be instead. Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900 and AS-OCT can be taken as reference. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:27:03Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-28ee1147145340c88203a8305013b8a2 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1672-5123 1672-5123 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-21T12:27:03Z |
publishDate | 2019-04-01 |
publisher | Press of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS) |
record_format | Article |
series | Guoji Yanke Zazhi |
spelling | doaj.art-28ee1147145340c88203a8305013b8a22022-12-21T19:04:08ZengPress of International Journal of Ophthalmology (IJO PRESS)Guoji Yanke Zazhi1672-51231672-51232019-04-0119470170310.3980/j.issn.1672-5123.2019.4.41Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantationHong-Zhi Yin0Department of Ming Vision Ophthalmology, Beijing 100062, ChinaAIM: To compare the differences of corneal diameter measured with wavelight anterior segment analyzer(Wavelight),IOL-master optical bio-measurement(LS900), anterior segment OCT(AS-OCT)and gauge.<p>METHODS: Totally 89 patients(177 eyes)with myopia who want to accept ICL were examined before operation with more than five kinds of instruments respectively, white to white(WTW)were examined with Wavelight, IOL-master, LS900 and gauge, angle to angle(ATA)with AS-OCT. Then the size of ICL was calculated based on the value of gauge. The vault of ICL was examined with OCT 3mo after operation.<p>RESULTS: WTW was(12.45±0.73, 11.96±0.39, 11.92±0.36, 11.49±0.30)mm measured by Wavelight, IOL-Master, LS900 and gauge respectively, ATA was(11.80±0.44)mm with AS-OCT. The value of gauge was the smallest one among them(all <i>P</i><0.01). Among four instruments, there was no statistical difference between LS900 and AS-OCT(<i>P</i>=0.098), they can instead of each other; there were differences among other instruments(<i>P</i><0.01). The size of ICL based on gauge was(12.77±0.37)mm. The vault of ICL is(537.41±181.22)μm 3mo after implantation obtained by OCT.<p>CONCLUSION: Gauge is ideal tool for measuring corneal diameter, it cannot be instead. Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900 and AS-OCT can be taken as reference.http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdfWTWICL V4cIOL MasterLS900WavelightAS-OCT |
spellingShingle | Hong-Zhi Yin Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation Guoji Yanke Zazhi WTW ICL V4c IOL Master LS900 Wavelight AS-OCT |
title | Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation |
title_full | Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation |
title_fullStr | Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation |
title_short | Comparision the differences of WTW obtained by Wavelight, IOL Master, LS900, AS-OCT and gauge before ICL implantation |
title_sort | comparision the differences of wtw obtained by wavelight iol master ls900 as oct and gauge before icl implantation |
topic | WTW ICL V4c IOL Master LS900 Wavelight AS-OCT |
url | http://ies.ijo.cn/cn_publish/2019/4/201904041.pdf |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongzhiyin comparisionthedifferencesofwtwobtainedbywavelightiolmasterls900asoctandgaugebeforeiclimplantation |