Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG

EEG is the most common technique for studying neuronal dynamics of the human brain. However, electromyogenic artifacts from cranial muscles and ocular muscles executing involuntary microsaccades compromise estimates of neuronal activity in the gamma band (> 30 Hz). Yet, the relative contribut...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Joerg F Hipp, Markus eSiegel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2013-07-01
Series:Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338/full
_version_ 1818302882560081920
author Joerg F Hipp
Joerg F Hipp
Markus eSiegel
Markus eSiegel
author_facet Joerg F Hipp
Joerg F Hipp
Markus eSiegel
Markus eSiegel
author_sort Joerg F Hipp
collection DOAJ
description EEG is the most common technique for studying neuronal dynamics of the human brain. However, electromyogenic artifacts from cranial muscles and ocular muscles executing involuntary microsaccades compromise estimates of neuronal activity in the gamma band (> 30 Hz). Yet, the relative contributions and practical consequences of these artifacts remain unclear. Here, we systematically dissected the effects of these different artifacts on studying visual gamma-band activity with EEG on the sensor and source level, and show strategies to cope with these confounds. We found that cranial muscle activity prevented a direct investigation of neuronal gamma-band activity at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found prolonged microsaccade-related artifacts beyond the well-known transient EEG confounds. We then show that if electromyogenic artifacts are carefully accounted for, the EEG nonetheless allows for studying visual gamma-band activity even at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found that source analysis based on spatial filtering does not only map the EEG signals to the cortical space of interest, but also efficiently accounts for cranial and ocular muscle artifacts. Together, our results clarify the relative contributions and characteristics of myogenic artifacts confounding visual gamma band activity in EEG, and provide practical guidelines for future experiments.
first_indexed 2024-12-13T05:45:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28ee4d9c749141b49227b5044d6da769
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1662-5161
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-13T05:45:58Z
publishDate 2013-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
spelling doaj.art-28ee4d9c749141b49227b5044d6da7692022-12-21T23:57:40ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Human Neuroscience1662-51612013-07-01710.3389/fnhum.2013.0033855268Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEGJoerg F Hipp0Joerg F Hipp1Markus eSiegel2Markus eSiegel3University of TübingenUniversity of TuebingenUniversity of TübingenUniversity of TuebingenEEG is the most common technique for studying neuronal dynamics of the human brain. However, electromyogenic artifacts from cranial muscles and ocular muscles executing involuntary microsaccades compromise estimates of neuronal activity in the gamma band (> 30 Hz). Yet, the relative contributions and practical consequences of these artifacts remain unclear. Here, we systematically dissected the effects of these different artifacts on studying visual gamma-band activity with EEG on the sensor and source level, and show strategies to cope with these confounds. We found that cranial muscle activity prevented a direct investigation of neuronal gamma-band activity at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found prolonged microsaccade-related artifacts beyond the well-known transient EEG confounds. We then show that if electromyogenic artifacts are carefully accounted for, the EEG nonetheless allows for studying visual gamma-band activity even at the sensor level. Furthermore, we found that source analysis based on spatial filtering does not only map the EEG signals to the cortical space of interest, but also efficiently accounts for cranial and ocular muscle artifacts. Together, our results clarify the relative contributions and characteristics of myogenic artifacts confounding visual gamma band activity in EEG, and provide practical guidelines for future experiments.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338/fullElectroencephalographyVisionoscillationGamma band activitybeamformingSource analysis
spellingShingle Joerg F Hipp
Joerg F Hipp
Markus eSiegel
Markus eSiegel
Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
Electroencephalography
Vision
oscillation
Gamma band activity
beamforming
Source analysis
title Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
title_full Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
title_fullStr Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
title_full_unstemmed Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
title_short Dissociating neuronal gamma-band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in EEG
title_sort dissociating neuronal gamma band activity from cranial and ocular muscle activity in eeg
topic Electroencephalography
Vision
oscillation
Gamma band activity
beamforming
Source analysis
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnhum.2013.00338/full
work_keys_str_mv AT joergfhipp dissociatingneuronalgammabandactivityfromcranialandocularmuscleactivityineeg
AT joergfhipp dissociatingneuronalgammabandactivityfromcranialandocularmuscleactivityineeg
AT markusesiegel dissociatingneuronalgammabandactivityfromcranialandocularmuscleactivityineeg
AT markusesiegel dissociatingneuronalgammabandactivityfromcranialandocularmuscleactivityineeg