Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China

Economic benefits and risk premiums significantly affect the production system decision making of farmers and government departments. This study evaluated the economic feasibility and estimated the risk premium of 12 rainfed soybean production systems with various planting densities, fertilization r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhenqi Liao, Shengzhao Pei, Zhentao Bai, Zhenlin Lai, Lei Wen, Fucang Zhang, Zhijun Li, Junliang Fan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-11-01
Series:Agronomy
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/11/2840
_version_ 1797460447210766336
author Zhenqi Liao
Shengzhao Pei
Zhentao Bai
Zhenlin Lai
Lei Wen
Fucang Zhang
Zhijun Li
Junliang Fan
author_facet Zhenqi Liao
Shengzhao Pei
Zhentao Bai
Zhenlin Lai
Lei Wen
Fucang Zhang
Zhijun Li
Junliang Fan
author_sort Zhenqi Liao
collection DOAJ
description Economic benefits and risk premiums significantly affect the production system decision making of farmers and government departments. This study evaluated the economic feasibility and estimated the risk premium of 12 rainfed soybean production systems with various planting densities, fertilization rates and planting patterns by considering the impact of soybean price fluctuation. There were two planting densities (D<sub>1</sub>: 160,000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> and D<sub>2</sub>: 320,000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>), two fertilization rates (F<sub>1</sub>: 20 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N, 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P, 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> K; F<sub>2</sub>: 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N, 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P, 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> K) and three planting patterns (F+W<sub>0</sub>: flat cultivation with no irrigation; R+W<sub>0</sub>: plastic-mulched ridge-furrow cultivation (PMRF) with no irrigation; R+W<sub>1</sub>: PMRF with supplemental irrigation of 30 mm at the pod-filling stage). Based on the two-year (2019–2020) field data in a semi-humid drought-prone region of northwest China and soybean price fluctuation from January 2014 to June 2021, the net income (NI) was calculated by considering the impact of soybean price fluctuation and assuming constant soybean production costs. The net present value (NPV) method and the stochastic efficiency with respect to a function (SERF) method were used to evaluate the profitability of protective alternatives and the risk of these alternatives. The results showed that the 12 proposed soybean production systems were economically feasible. Reducing the fertilization rate reduced the input costs, but it did not necessarily result in a decrease in soybean yield and NI. The payback period of all production systems was within two years for farmers investing through loans. High-fertilizer and high-density production systems made personal investment obtain the highest economic benefit in this study, which was not the best investment strategy from the perspective of production-to-investment ratio and environmental protection departments. The preferences of farmers with various risk aversion and environmental protection departments in terms of risk premium were also proposed. The economic and risk assessment framework of this study can enhance the understanding of the adjustment of production systems from different perspectives, and provide strategies for promoting the protection of economic, environmental and socially sustainable agricultural systems.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:05:13Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28eeb7903a4c4f2a820235a2df985da1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4395
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:05:13Z
publishDate 2023-11-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Agronomy
spelling doaj.art-28eeb7903a4c4f2a820235a2df985da12023-11-24T14:24:14ZengMDPI AGAgronomy2073-43952023-11-011311284010.3390/agronomy13112840Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest ChinaZhenqi Liao0Shengzhao Pei1Zhentao Bai2Zhenlin Lai3Lei Wen4Fucang Zhang5Zhijun Li6Junliang Fan7Key Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaKey Laboratory of Agricultural Soil and Water Engineering in Arid and Semiarid Areas of the Ministry of Education, Northwest A&F University, Xianyang 712100, ChinaEconomic benefits and risk premiums significantly affect the production system decision making of farmers and government departments. This study evaluated the economic feasibility and estimated the risk premium of 12 rainfed soybean production systems with various planting densities, fertilization rates and planting patterns by considering the impact of soybean price fluctuation. There were two planting densities (D<sub>1</sub>: 160,000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup> and D<sub>2</sub>: 320,000 plants ha<sup>−1</sup>), two fertilization rates (F<sub>1</sub>: 20 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N, 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P, 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> K; F<sub>2</sub>: 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> N, 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P, 60 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> K) and three planting patterns (F+W<sub>0</sub>: flat cultivation with no irrigation; R+W<sub>0</sub>: plastic-mulched ridge-furrow cultivation (PMRF) with no irrigation; R+W<sub>1</sub>: PMRF with supplemental irrigation of 30 mm at the pod-filling stage). Based on the two-year (2019–2020) field data in a semi-humid drought-prone region of northwest China and soybean price fluctuation from January 2014 to June 2021, the net income (NI) was calculated by considering the impact of soybean price fluctuation and assuming constant soybean production costs. The net present value (NPV) method and the stochastic efficiency with respect to a function (SERF) method were used to evaluate the profitability of protective alternatives and the risk of these alternatives. The results showed that the 12 proposed soybean production systems were economically feasible. Reducing the fertilization rate reduced the input costs, but it did not necessarily result in a decrease in soybean yield and NI. The payback period of all production systems was within two years for farmers investing through loans. High-fertilizer and high-density production systems made personal investment obtain the highest economic benefit in this study, which was not the best investment strategy from the perspective of production-to-investment ratio and environmental protection departments. The preferences of farmers with various risk aversion and environmental protection departments in terms of risk premium were also proposed. The economic and risk assessment framework of this study can enhance the understanding of the adjustment of production systems from different perspectives, and provide strategies for promoting the protection of economic, environmental and socially sustainable agricultural systems.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/11/2840soybeanprice fluctuationeconomic evaluationrisk premiumoutput/input ratio
spellingShingle Zhenqi Liao
Shengzhao Pei
Zhentao Bai
Zhenlin Lai
Lei Wen
Fucang Zhang
Zhijun Li
Junliang Fan
Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
Agronomy
soybean
price fluctuation
economic evaluation
risk premium
output/input ratio
title Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
title_full Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
title_short Economic Evaluation and Risk Premium Estimation of Rainfed Soybean under Various Planting Practices in a Semi-Humid Drought-Prone Region of Northwest China
title_sort economic evaluation and risk premium estimation of rainfed soybean under various planting practices in a semi humid drought prone region of northwest china
topic soybean
price fluctuation
economic evaluation
risk premium
output/input ratio
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4395/13/11/2840
work_keys_str_mv AT zhenqiliao economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT shengzhaopei economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT zhentaobai economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT zhenlinlai economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT leiwen economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT fucangzhang economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT zhijunli economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina
AT junliangfan economicevaluationandriskpremiumestimationofrainfedsoybeanundervariousplantingpracticesinasemihumiddroughtproneregionofnorthwestchina