Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds

In this research work, it was aimed to analyse the thermal behaviour during FSW in order to understand the diffusion behaviour of Al (AA6061)-Mg (AZ31B) dissimilar joints. Three heat input levels at different weld pitch ratios (WPR) of 0.087, 0.068 and 0.051 are accounted for the analysis. Finite el...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: M Naveenkumar, M Subramanian, R Ranjith
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:Materials Research Express
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad09a8
_version_ 1797627652435083264
author M Naveenkumar
M Subramanian
R Ranjith
author_facet M Naveenkumar
M Subramanian
R Ranjith
author_sort M Naveenkumar
collection DOAJ
description In this research work, it was aimed to analyse the thermal behaviour during FSW in order to understand the diffusion behaviour of Al (AA6061)-Mg (AZ31B) dissimilar joints. Three heat input levels at different weld pitch ratios (WPR) of 0.087, 0.068 and 0.051 are accounted for the analysis. Finite element modelling (FEM) is employed to predict temperature evolutions. From the FEM results and fundamental diffusion equations, the intermetallic thickness and the diffusion behaviour between the Al and Mg material were analyzed and found that the Al-rich intermetallic phases Al _3 Mg _2 grow faster and wider than the Mg-rich phase Al _12 Mg _17 . Tensile test demonstrates that a lower welding pitch ratio (WPR) leads to the formation of thicker intermetallic layers, resulting in reduced tensile strength and joint efficiency. In contrast, a higher WPR (0.087) minimizes intermetallic thickness, yielding superior tensile properties (138mpa). Microhardness measurements at the stir zone reveal a broad range from 70 to 164 HV, signifying mechanical heterogeneity. Microstructural reveals that a complex interplay between Al and Mg materials, resulting in fine equiaxed grains, intermetallic compounds, and distinct flow patterns in the stir zone.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T10:27:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-28f78b7d2a514c16a5b57cf12de3962f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2053-1591
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T10:27:24Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Materials Research Express
spelling doaj.art-28f78b7d2a514c16a5b57cf12de3962f2023-11-15T11:03:22ZengIOP PublishingMaterials Research Express2053-15912023-01-01101111651110.1088/2053-1591/ad09a8Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir weldsM Naveenkumar0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8022-2049M Subramanian1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1979-1733R Ranjith2https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5278-5039Department of Mechanical Engineering, Arjun College of Technology , Coimbatore, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, SNS College of Technology , Coimbatore, IndiaDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, SNS College of Technology , Coimbatore, IndiaIn this research work, it was aimed to analyse the thermal behaviour during FSW in order to understand the diffusion behaviour of Al (AA6061)-Mg (AZ31B) dissimilar joints. Three heat input levels at different weld pitch ratios (WPR) of 0.087, 0.068 and 0.051 are accounted for the analysis. Finite element modelling (FEM) is employed to predict temperature evolutions. From the FEM results and fundamental diffusion equations, the intermetallic thickness and the diffusion behaviour between the Al and Mg material were analyzed and found that the Al-rich intermetallic phases Al _3 Mg _2 grow faster and wider than the Mg-rich phase Al _12 Mg _17 . Tensile test demonstrates that a lower welding pitch ratio (WPR) leads to the formation of thicker intermetallic layers, resulting in reduced tensile strength and joint efficiency. In contrast, a higher WPR (0.087) minimizes intermetallic thickness, yielding superior tensile properties (138mpa). Microhardness measurements at the stir zone reveal a broad range from 70 to 164 HV, signifying mechanical heterogeneity. Microstructural reveals that a complex interplay between Al and Mg materials, resulting in fine equiaxed grains, intermetallic compounds, and distinct flow patterns in the stir zone.https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad09a8aluminium alloymagnesium alloyfriction stir weldingheat inputfinite element methoddiffusion
spellingShingle M Naveenkumar
M Subramanian
R Ranjith
Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
Materials Research Express
aluminium alloy
magnesium alloy
friction stir welding
heat input
finite element method
diffusion
title Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
title_full Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
title_fullStr Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
title_full_unstemmed Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
title_short Experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in Al–Mg friction stir welds
title_sort experimental and numerical analysis of intermetallics in al mg friction stir welds
topic aluminium alloy
magnesium alloy
friction stir welding
heat input
finite element method
diffusion
url https://doi.org/10.1088/2053-1591/ad09a8
work_keys_str_mv AT mnaveenkumar experimentalandnumericalanalysisofintermetallicsinalmgfrictionstirwelds
AT msubramanian experimentalandnumericalanalysisofintermetallicsinalmgfrictionstirwelds
AT rranjith experimentalandnumericalanalysisofintermetallicsinalmgfrictionstirwelds