Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer

Purpose: Currently, several active clinical trials of functional lung avoidance radiation therapy using different imaging modalities for ventilation or perfusion are underway. Patients with lung cancer often show ventilation-perfusion mismatch, whereas the significance of dose-function metric remain...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Yujiro Nakajima, MS, Noriyuki Kadoya, PhD, Tomoki Kimura, MD, PhD, Kazunari Hioki, MS, Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD, Tokihiro Yamamoto, PhD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2020-05-01
Series:Advances in Radiation Oncology
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420300531
_version_ 1818931837512187904
author Yujiro Nakajima, MS
Noriyuki Kadoya, PhD
Tomoki Kimura, MD, PhD
Kazunari Hioki, MS
Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD
Tokihiro Yamamoto, PhD
author_facet Yujiro Nakajima, MS
Noriyuki Kadoya, PhD
Tomoki Kimura, MD, PhD
Kazunari Hioki, MS
Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD
Tokihiro Yamamoto, PhD
author_sort Yujiro Nakajima, MS
collection DOAJ
description Purpose: Currently, several active clinical trials of functional lung avoidance radiation therapy using different imaging modalities for ventilation or perfusion are underway. Patients with lung cancer often show ventilation-perfusion mismatch, whereas the significance of dose-function metric remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare dose-ventilation metrics with dose-perfusion metrics for radiation therapy plan evaluation. Methods and Materials: Pretreatment 4-dimensional computed tomography and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion images of 60 patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy were analyzed. Ventilation images were created using the deformable image registration of 4-dimensional computed tomography image sets and image analysis for regional volume changes as a surrogate for ventilation. Ventilation and perfusion images were converted into percentile distribution images. Analyses included Pearson’s correlation coefficient and comparison of agreements between the following dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics: functional mean lung dose and functional percent lung function receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy (fV5, fV10, fV20, fV30, and fV40, respectively). Results: Overall, the dose-ventilation metrics were greater than the dose-perfusion metrics (ie, fV20, 26.3% ± 9.9% vs 23.9% ± 9.8%). Correlations between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics were strong (range, r = 0.94-0.97), whereas the agreements widely varied among patients, with differences as large as 6.6 Gy for functional mean lung dose and 11.1% for fV20. Paired t test indicated that the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics were significantly different. Conclusions: Strong correlations were present between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics. However, the agreement between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics widely varied among patients, suggesting that ventilation-based radiation therapy plan evaluation may not be comparable to that based on perfusion. Future studies should elucidate the correlation of dose-function metrics with clinical pulmonary toxicity metrics.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T04:22:56Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2901ca0e10e2444d8ef60de09418398f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2452-1094
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T04:22:56Z
publishDate 2020-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Advances in Radiation Oncology
spelling doaj.art-2901ca0e10e2444d8ef60de09418398f2022-12-21T19:53:35ZengElsevierAdvances in Radiation Oncology2452-10942020-05-0153459465Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung CancerYujiro Nakajima, MS0Noriyuki Kadoya, PhD1Tomoki Kimura, MD, PhD2Kazunari Hioki, MS3Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD4Tokihiro Yamamoto, PhD5Department of Radiation Oncology, Tokyo Metropolitan Cancer and Infectious Diseases Center Komagome Hospital, Tokyo, Japan; Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan; Corresponding author: Noriyuki Kadoya, PhDDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Hiroshima, JapanDepartment of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan; Graduate School of Health Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, JapanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, JapanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CaliforniaPurpose: Currently, several active clinical trials of functional lung avoidance radiation therapy using different imaging modalities for ventilation or perfusion are underway. Patients with lung cancer often show ventilation-perfusion mismatch, whereas the significance of dose-function metric remains unclear. The aim of the present study was to compare dose-ventilation metrics with dose-perfusion metrics for radiation therapy plan evaluation. Methods and Materials: Pretreatment 4-dimensional computed tomography and 99mTc-macroaggregated albumin single-photon emission computed tomography perfusion images of 60 patients with lung cancer treated with radiation therapy were analyzed. Ventilation images were created using the deformable image registration of 4-dimensional computed tomography image sets and image analysis for regional volume changes as a surrogate for ventilation. Ventilation and perfusion images were converted into percentile distribution images. Analyses included Pearson’s correlation coefficient and comparison of agreements between the following dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics: functional mean lung dose and functional percent lung function receiving 5, 10, 20, 30, and 40 Gy (fV5, fV10, fV20, fV30, and fV40, respectively). Results: Overall, the dose-ventilation metrics were greater than the dose-perfusion metrics (ie, fV20, 26.3% ± 9.9% vs 23.9% ± 9.8%). Correlations between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics were strong (range, r = 0.94-0.97), whereas the agreements widely varied among patients, with differences as large as 6.6 Gy for functional mean lung dose and 11.1% for fV20. Paired t test indicated that the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics were significantly different. Conclusions: Strong correlations were present between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics. However, the agreement between the dose-ventilation and dose-perfusion metrics widely varied among patients, suggesting that ventilation-based radiation therapy plan evaluation may not be comparable to that based on perfusion. Future studies should elucidate the correlation of dose-function metrics with clinical pulmonary toxicity metrics.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420300531
spellingShingle Yujiro Nakajima, MS
Noriyuki Kadoya, PhD
Tomoki Kimura, MD, PhD
Kazunari Hioki, MS
Keiichi Jingu, MD, PhD
Tokihiro Yamamoto, PhD
Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
Advances in Radiation Oncology
title Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
title_full Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
title_fullStr Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
title_short Variations Between Dose-Ventilation and Dose-Perfusion Metrics in Radiation Therapy Planning for Lung Cancer
title_sort variations between dose ventilation and dose perfusion metrics in radiation therapy planning for lung cancer
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109420300531
work_keys_str_mv AT yujironakajimams variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer
AT noriyukikadoyaphd variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer
AT tomokikimuramdphd variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer
AT kazunarihiokims variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer
AT keiichijingumdphd variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer
AT tokihiroyamamotophd variationsbetweendoseventilationanddoseperfusionmetricsinradiationtherapyplanningforlungcancer