Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?

In Sri Lanka, the wet zone of Colombo and other urban areas usually experience urban flooding situations. Furthermore, the urban setting is rapidly changing. The community perceives flood control and water conservation relatively poorly. Rainwater harvesting is a low-impact development (LID) method...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chamika M. Ranasingha, Premachandra Wattage
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-01-01
Series:Conservation
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/4/1/2
_version_ 1797241498515800064
author Chamika M. Ranasingha
Premachandra Wattage
author_facet Chamika M. Ranasingha
Premachandra Wattage
author_sort Chamika M. Ranasingha
collection DOAJ
description In Sri Lanka, the wet zone of Colombo and other urban areas usually experience urban flooding situations. Furthermore, the urban setting is rapidly changing. The community perceives flood control and water conservation relatively poorly. Rainwater harvesting is a low-impact development (LID) method to control urban flash flood situations. However, considering people’s interest in and awareness of rainwater harvesting (RWH), it was found that RWH is a lost factor in urban conservation. Therefore, using economically attractive choices, this study estimated the trade-off of residents practicing RWH in urban areas affected by high surface water runoff. The study’s selected area was the Thimbirigasyaya Divisional Secretariat Division (DSD) flooding spots, an ideal location to estimate the preferences/trade-offs of individuals regarding rainwater harvesting practices. This estimation was calculated using a choice experiment (CE) method, which is an economic valuation method. Under this method, the conditional logit model was used to analyze people’s preferences. The results showed that people are motivated and prefer to use RWH due to selected attributes in the field survey. This promising result implies that individuals prefer to use the RWH system as a method of stormwater management and water conservation. Moreover, most residents are willing to adopt these systems looking at their monthly water bill reduction and as promoters of green building concepts.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T18:24:17Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2903ce701b81400983ee09d94b1cc13a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2673-7159
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T18:24:17Z
publishDate 2024-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Conservation
spelling doaj.art-2903ce701b81400983ee09d94b1cc13a2024-03-27T13:32:09ZengMDPI AGConservation2673-71592024-01-0141233510.3390/conservation4010002Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?Chamika M. Ranasingha0Premachandra Wattage1The Department of Town & Country Planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri LankaThe Department of Town & Country Planning, Faculty of Architecture, University of Moratuwa, Moratuwa 10400, Sri LankaIn Sri Lanka, the wet zone of Colombo and other urban areas usually experience urban flooding situations. Furthermore, the urban setting is rapidly changing. The community perceives flood control and water conservation relatively poorly. Rainwater harvesting is a low-impact development (LID) method to control urban flash flood situations. However, considering people’s interest in and awareness of rainwater harvesting (RWH), it was found that RWH is a lost factor in urban conservation. Therefore, using economically attractive choices, this study estimated the trade-off of residents practicing RWH in urban areas affected by high surface water runoff. The study’s selected area was the Thimbirigasyaya Divisional Secretariat Division (DSD) flooding spots, an ideal location to estimate the preferences/trade-offs of individuals regarding rainwater harvesting practices. This estimation was calculated using a choice experiment (CE) method, which is an economic valuation method. Under this method, the conditional logit model was used to analyze people’s preferences. The results showed that people are motivated and prefer to use RWH due to selected attributes in the field survey. This promising result implies that individuals prefer to use the RWH system as a method of stormwater management and water conservation. Moreover, most residents are willing to adopt these systems looking at their monthly water bill reduction and as promoters of green building concepts.https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/4/1/2rainwater harvestingstormwater managementwater conservationurban floodingchoice experimentconditional logit model
spellingShingle Chamika M. Ranasingha
Premachandra Wattage
Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
Conservation
rainwater harvesting
stormwater management
water conservation
urban flooding
choice experiment
conditional logit model
title Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
title_full Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
title_fullStr Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
title_full_unstemmed Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
title_short Rainwater Harvesting (RWH) Systems: Is the Conservation of Water in Colombo Urban Areas Worth It?
title_sort rainwater harvesting rwh systems is the conservation of water in colombo urban areas worth it
topic rainwater harvesting
stormwater management
water conservation
urban flooding
choice experiment
conditional logit model
url https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7159/4/1/2
work_keys_str_mv AT chamikamranasingha rainwaterharvestingrwhsystemsistheconservationofwaterincolombourbanareasworthit
AT premachandrawattage rainwaterharvestingrwhsystemsistheconservationofwaterincolombourbanareasworthit