Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul

Social media (SM) can be an invaluable resource in terms of understanding and managing the effects of catastrophic disasters. In order to use SM platforms for public participatory (PP) mapping of emergency management activities, a bias investigation should be undertaken with regard to the data relat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ayse Giz Gulnerman, Himmet Karaman, Direnc Pekaslan, Serdar Bilgi
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2020-04-01
Series:ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/4/222
_version_ 1797571313881055232
author Ayse Giz Gulnerman
Himmet Karaman
Direnc Pekaslan
Serdar Bilgi
author_facet Ayse Giz Gulnerman
Himmet Karaman
Direnc Pekaslan
Serdar Bilgi
author_sort Ayse Giz Gulnerman
collection DOAJ
description Social media (SM) can be an invaluable resource in terms of understanding and managing the effects of catastrophic disasters. In order to use SM platforms for public participatory (PP) mapping of emergency management activities, a bias investigation should be undertaken with regard to the data related to the study area (urban, regional or national, etc.) to determine the spatial data dynamics. Thus, such determinations can be made on how SM can be used and interpreted in terms of PP. In this study, the city of Istanbul was chosen for social media data research area, as it is one of the most crowded cities in the world and expecting a major earthquake. The methodology for the data investigation is: 1. Obtain data and engage sampling, 2. Identify the representation and temporal biases in the data and normalize it in response to representation bias, 3. Identify general anomalies and spatial anomalies, 4. Manipulate the trend of the dataset with the discretization of anomalies and 5. Examine the spatiotemporal bias. Using this bias investigation methodology, citizen footprint dynamics in the city were determined and reference maps (most likely regional anomaly maps, representation maps, time-space bias maps, etc.) were produced. The outcomes of the study can be summarized in four steps. First, highly active users generate the majority of the data and removing this data as a general approach within a pseudo-cleaning process means concealing a large amount of data. Second, data normalization in terms of activity levels, changes the anomaly outcome resulting from diverse representation levels of users. Third, spatiotemporally normalized data present strong spatial anomaly tendency in some parts of the central area. Fourth, trend data is dense in the central area and the spatiotemporal bias assessments show the data density varies in terms of the time of day, day of week and season of the year. The methodology proposed in this study can be used to extract the unbiased daily routines of the social media data of the regions for the normal days and this can be referred for the emergency or unexpected event cases to detect the change or impacts.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T20:37:32Z
format Article
id doaj.art-290c873742464585a5e62571ab15ef69
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2220-9964
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T20:37:32Z
publishDate 2020-04-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
spelling doaj.art-290c873742464585a5e62571ab15ef692023-11-19T20:52:34ZengMDPI AGISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information2220-99642020-04-019422210.3390/ijgi9040222Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in IstanbulAyse Giz Gulnerman0Himmet Karaman1Direnc Pekaslan2Serdar Bilgi3Geomatics Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, TurkeyGeomatics Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, TurkeySchool of Computer Science, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG8 1BB, UKGeomatics Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, 34469 Istanbul, TurkeySocial media (SM) can be an invaluable resource in terms of understanding and managing the effects of catastrophic disasters. In order to use SM platforms for public participatory (PP) mapping of emergency management activities, a bias investigation should be undertaken with regard to the data related to the study area (urban, regional or national, etc.) to determine the spatial data dynamics. Thus, such determinations can be made on how SM can be used and interpreted in terms of PP. In this study, the city of Istanbul was chosen for social media data research area, as it is one of the most crowded cities in the world and expecting a major earthquake. The methodology for the data investigation is: 1. Obtain data and engage sampling, 2. Identify the representation and temporal biases in the data and normalize it in response to representation bias, 3. Identify general anomalies and spatial anomalies, 4. Manipulate the trend of the dataset with the discretization of anomalies and 5. Examine the spatiotemporal bias. Using this bias investigation methodology, citizen footprint dynamics in the city were determined and reference maps (most likely regional anomaly maps, representation maps, time-space bias maps, etc.) were produced. The outcomes of the study can be summarized in four steps. First, highly active users generate the majority of the data and removing this data as a general approach within a pseudo-cleaning process means concealing a large amount of data. Second, data normalization in terms of activity levels, changes the anomaly outcome resulting from diverse representation levels of users. Third, spatiotemporally normalized data present strong spatial anomaly tendency in some parts of the central area. Fourth, trend data is dense in the central area and the spatiotemporal bias assessments show the data density varies in terms of the time of day, day of week and season of the year. The methodology proposed in this study can be used to extract the unbiased daily routines of the social media data of the regions for the normal days and this can be referred for the emergency or unexpected event cases to detect the change or impacts.https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/4/222volunteered geographic informationsocial mediapublic participationspatiotemporal bias
spellingShingle Ayse Giz Gulnerman
Himmet Karaman
Direnc Pekaslan
Serdar Bilgi
Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
volunteered geographic information
social media
public participation
spatiotemporal bias
title Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
title_full Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
title_fullStr Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
title_full_unstemmed Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
title_short Citizens’ Spatial Footprint on Twitter—Anomaly, Trend and Bias Investigation in Istanbul
title_sort citizens spatial footprint on twitter anomaly trend and bias investigation in istanbul
topic volunteered geographic information
social media
public participation
spatiotemporal bias
url https://www.mdpi.com/2220-9964/9/4/222
work_keys_str_mv AT aysegizgulnerman citizensspatialfootprintontwitteranomalytrendandbiasinvestigationinistanbul
AT himmetkaraman citizensspatialfootprintontwitteranomalytrendandbiasinvestigationinistanbul
AT direncpekaslan citizensspatialfootprintontwitteranomalytrendandbiasinvestigationinistanbul
AT serdarbilgi citizensspatialfootprintontwitteranomalytrendandbiasinvestigationinistanbul