Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire

In this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Joffrey Paillard
Format: Article
Language:fra
Published: MSH Paris Nord
Series:Appareil
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156
_version_ 1797308124590243840
author Joffrey Paillard
author_facet Joffrey Paillard
author_sort Joffrey Paillard
collection DOAJ
description In this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”. This way of proceeding will be for us the occasion to make dialogue two visions – one Flusserian, another Foucauldian – of “power” which seem to us to answer each other. By proceeding in this way, the dialectic proposed by Flusser between on the one hand the “friendly” designer and on the other hand the “cunning” design echoes the governmentality theorized by Foucault, understood as the way of leading bodies according to a certain disciplinary ideology. Considering technique and discipline through design will then allow us to understand the latter as an active device by moving away from the simple use / function dialectic.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T01:07:10Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2911ba714d794cf18c6809371de3887e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2101-0714
language fra
last_indexed 2024-03-08T01:07:10Z
publisher MSH Paris Nord
record_format Article
series Appareil
spelling doaj.art-2911ba714d794cf18c6809371de3887e2024-02-14T16:29:02ZfraMSH Paris NordAppareil2101-07142510.4000/appareil.6156Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaireJoffrey PaillardIn this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”. This way of proceeding will be for us the occasion to make dialogue two visions – one Flusserian, another Foucauldian – of “power” which seem to us to answer each other. By proceeding in this way, the dialectic proposed by Flusser between on the one hand the “friendly” designer and on the other hand the “cunning” design echoes the governmentality theorized by Foucault, understood as the way of leading bodies according to a certain disciplinary ideology. Considering technique and discipline through design will then allow us to understand the latter as an active device by moving away from the simple use / function dialectic.https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156designtechniquedevicedisciplinesubjectivity
spellingShingle Joffrey Paillard
Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
Appareil
design
technique
device
discipline
subjectivity
title Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
title_full Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
title_fullStr Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
title_full_unstemmed Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
title_short Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
title_sort le dispositif design quand la technique devient disciplinaire
topic design
technique
device
discipline
subjectivity
url https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156
work_keys_str_mv AT joffreypaillard ledispositifdesignquandlatechniquedevientdisciplinaire