Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire
In this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | fra |
Published: |
MSH Paris Nord
|
Series: | Appareil |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156 |
_version_ | 1797308124590243840 |
---|---|
author | Joffrey Paillard |
author_facet | Joffrey Paillard |
author_sort | Joffrey Paillard |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”. This way of proceeding will be for us the occasion to make dialogue two visions – one Flusserian, another Foucauldian – of “power” which seem to us to answer each other. By proceeding in this way, the dialectic proposed by Flusser between on the one hand the “friendly” designer and on the other hand the “cunning” design echoes the governmentality theorized by Foucault, understood as the way of leading bodies according to a certain disciplinary ideology. Considering technique and discipline through design will then allow us to understand the latter as an active device by moving away from the simple use / function dialectic. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-08T01:07:10Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2911ba714d794cf18c6809371de3887e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2101-0714 |
language | fra |
last_indexed | 2024-03-08T01:07:10Z |
publisher | MSH Paris Nord |
record_format | Article |
series | Appareil |
spelling | doaj.art-2911ba714d794cf18c6809371de3887e2024-02-14T16:29:02ZfraMSH Paris NordAppareil2101-07142510.4000/appareil.6156Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaireJoffrey PaillardIn this article, we wish to question the term “discipline” in the title of this issue of Appareil not only in its “technical” sense, but also in its “disciplinary” sense. This change of paradigm will allow us to question the design, the object-design as well as what we call here the “device-design”. This way of proceeding will be for us the occasion to make dialogue two visions – one Flusserian, another Foucauldian – of “power” which seem to us to answer each other. By proceeding in this way, the dialectic proposed by Flusser between on the one hand the “friendly” designer and on the other hand the “cunning” design echoes the governmentality theorized by Foucault, understood as the way of leading bodies according to a certain disciplinary ideology. Considering technique and discipline through design will then allow us to understand the latter as an active device by moving away from the simple use / function dialectic.https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156designtechniquedevicedisciplinesubjectivity |
spellingShingle | Joffrey Paillard Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire Appareil design technique device discipline subjectivity |
title | Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
title_full | Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
title_fullStr | Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
title_short | Le dispositif-design : quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
title_sort | le dispositif design quand la technique devient disciplinaire |
topic | design technique device discipline subjectivity |
url | https://journals.openedition.org/appareil/6156 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT joffreypaillard ledispositifdesignquandlatechniquedevientdisciplinaire |