Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes

Abstract Background Lymph node micrometastasis is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, but patients with different numbers of involved lymph nodes are all divided into the same N1mi stage without distinction. We designed this study to compare the prognosis and local treatment recommendat...

Fuld beskrivelse

Bibliografiske detaljer
Main Authors: Shiping Luo, Wenfen Fu, Jingyi Lin, Jie Zhang, Chuangui Song
Format: Article
Sprog:English
Udgivet: BMC 2023-07-01
Serier:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Fag:
Online adgang:https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03082-x
_version_ 1827899834611269632
author Shiping Luo
Wenfen Fu
Jingyi Lin
Jie Zhang
Chuangui Song
author_facet Shiping Luo
Wenfen Fu
Jingyi Lin
Jie Zhang
Chuangui Song
author_sort Shiping Luo
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Background Lymph node micrometastasis is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, but patients with different numbers of involved lymph nodes are all divided into the same N1mi stage without distinction. We designed this study to compare the prognosis and local treatment recommendations of N1mi breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes. Patients and methods A total of 27,032 breast cancer patients with T1-2N1miM0 stage from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004–2019) who underwent breast surgery were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups for prognosis comparison according to the number of micrometastatic lymph nodes: N1mi with 1 (Nmi = 1), 2 (Nmi = 2), or more (Nmi ≥ 3) involved lymph nodes. We explored the characteristics and survival outcomes of the population receiving different local treatments, including different axillary surgery types and whether receiving radiotherapy or not. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in different groups. Stratified analyses and interaction analyses were also applied to explore the predictive significance of different involved lymph nodes numbers. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was utilized to balance the differences between groups. Results Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that nodal status was an independent prognostic factor. After adjustment for other prognostic factors, there was a significant difference in prognosis between Nmi = 1 group and Nmi = 2 group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.145, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047–1.251, P = 0.003], and patients with Nmi ≥ 3 group had a significantly poorer prognosis (adjusted HR 1.679, 95% CI 1.589–2.407; P < 0.001). The proportion of N1mi patients only underwent sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) gradually increased from 2010 (P trend < 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, N1mi patients who underwent axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) was associated with significant survival benefit than SLNB (adjusted HR 0.932, 95%CI 0.874–0.994; P = 0.033), the same goes for receiving radiotherapy (adjusted HR 1.107, 95%CI 1.030–1.190; P = 0.006). Further stratified analysis showed that in the SLNB subgroup, radiotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 1.695, 95%CI 1.534–1.874; P < 0.001), whereas in the ALND subgroup, there was no significant prognostic difference with or without radiotherapy (HR 1.029, 95%CI 0.933–1.136; P = 0.564). Conclusion Our study indicates that the increasing number of lymph node micrometastases was associated a worse prognosis of N1mi breast cancer patients. In addition, ALND does provide a significant survival benefit for these patients, while the benefit from local radiotherapy may be of even greater importance.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T23:23:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-292367b171314c5ca149d9356850ac09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1477-7819
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T23:23:01Z
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
series World Journal of Surgical Oncology
spelling doaj.art-292367b171314c5ca149d9356850ac092023-07-16T11:18:43ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192023-07-0121111010.1186/s12957-023-03082-xPrognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodesShiping Luo0Wenfen Fu1Jingyi Lin2Jie Zhang3Chuangui Song4Department of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union HospitalDepartment of Breast Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union HospitalAbstract Background Lymph node micrometastasis is an important prognostic factor in breast cancer, but patients with different numbers of involved lymph nodes are all divided into the same N1mi stage without distinction. We designed this study to compare the prognosis and local treatment recommendations of N1mi breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes. Patients and methods A total of 27,032 breast cancer patients with T1-2N1miM0 stage from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (2004–2019) who underwent breast surgery were included in this retrospective study. Patients were divided into three groups for prognosis comparison according to the number of micrometastatic lymph nodes: N1mi with 1 (Nmi = 1), 2 (Nmi = 2), or more (Nmi ≥ 3) involved lymph nodes. We explored the characteristics and survival outcomes of the population receiving different local treatments, including different axillary surgery types and whether receiving radiotherapy or not. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used to compare the overall survival (OS) and breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) in different groups. Stratified analyses and interaction analyses were also applied to explore the predictive significance of different involved lymph nodes numbers. Propensity score matching (PSM) method was utilized to balance the differences between groups. Results Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that nodal status was an independent prognostic factor. After adjustment for other prognostic factors, there was a significant difference in prognosis between Nmi = 1 group and Nmi = 2 group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.145, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.047–1.251, P = 0.003], and patients with Nmi ≥ 3 group had a significantly poorer prognosis (adjusted HR 1.679, 95% CI 1.589–2.407; P < 0.001). The proportion of N1mi patients only underwent sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB) gradually increased from 2010 (P trend < 0.001). After adjusting for other factors, N1mi patients who underwent axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND) was associated with significant survival benefit than SLNB (adjusted HR 0.932, 95%CI 0.874–0.994; P = 0.033), the same goes for receiving radiotherapy (adjusted HR 1.107, 95%CI 1.030–1.190; P = 0.006). Further stratified analysis showed that in the SLNB subgroup, radiotherapy was associated with a significant survival benefit (HR 1.695, 95%CI 1.534–1.874; P < 0.001), whereas in the ALND subgroup, there was no significant prognostic difference with or without radiotherapy (HR 1.029, 95%CI 0.933–1.136; P = 0.564). Conclusion Our study indicates that the increasing number of lymph node micrometastases was associated a worse prognosis of N1mi breast cancer patients. In addition, ALND does provide a significant survival benefit for these patients, while the benefit from local radiotherapy may be of even greater importance.https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03082-xN1mi breast cancerLymph node micrometastases (LNMM)Sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB)Axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND)Local radiotherapy
spellingShingle Shiping Luo
Wenfen Fu
Jingyi Lin
Jie Zhang
Chuangui Song
Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
World Journal of Surgical Oncology
N1mi breast cancer
Lymph node micrometastases (LNMM)
Sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB)
Axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND)
Local radiotherapy
title Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
title_full Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
title_fullStr Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
title_short Prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
title_sort prognosis and local treatment strategies of breast cancer patients with different numbers of micrometastatic lymph nodes
topic N1mi breast cancer
Lymph node micrometastases (LNMM)
Sentinel lymph nodes biopsy (SLNB)
Axillary lymph nodes dissection (ALND)
Local radiotherapy
url https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-023-03082-x
work_keys_str_mv AT shipingluo prognosisandlocaltreatmentstrategiesofbreastcancerpatientswithdifferentnumbersofmicrometastaticlymphnodes
AT wenfenfu prognosisandlocaltreatmentstrategiesofbreastcancerpatientswithdifferentnumbersofmicrometastaticlymphnodes
AT jingyilin prognosisandlocaltreatmentstrategiesofbreastcancerpatientswithdifferentnumbersofmicrometastaticlymphnodes
AT jiezhang prognosisandlocaltreatmentstrategiesofbreastcancerpatientswithdifferentnumbersofmicrometastaticlymphnodes
AT chuanguisong prognosisandlocaltreatmentstrategiesofbreastcancerpatientswithdifferentnumbersofmicrometastaticlymphnodes