Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle

The success of a breeding program invariably depends on the quality of data collected. Visual scores have the advantage of low operating cost for their collection, but they require objectivity, both in definition and in the process of attribution of the phenotype, since they depend on a classifier....

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Rafael Guimarães Vizoná, Bruno da Costa Perez, Aníbal Eugenio Vercesi Filho, André Rabelo Fernandes, Ricardo Vieira Ventura, Júlio César de Carvalho Balieiro
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto de Zootecnia 2018-04-01
Series:Boletim de Indústria Animal
Subjects:
Online Access:http://35.199.65.98:80/index.php/bia/article/view/1720
_version_ 1811325828079812608
author Rafael Guimarães Vizoná
Bruno da Costa Perez
Aníbal Eugenio Vercesi Filho
André Rabelo Fernandes
Ricardo Vieira Ventura
Júlio César de Carvalho Balieiro
author_facet Rafael Guimarães Vizoná
Bruno da Costa Perez
Aníbal Eugenio Vercesi Filho
André Rabelo Fernandes
Ricardo Vieira Ventura
Júlio César de Carvalho Balieiro
author_sort Rafael Guimarães Vizoná
collection DOAJ
description The success of a breeding program invariably depends on the quality of data collected. Visual scores have the advantage of low operating cost for their collection, but they require objectivity, both in definition and in the process of attribution of the phenotype, since they depend on a classifier. In the National breeding program of Gyr dairy cattle (PNMGL), from a total of 18 traits, five are evaluated by visual scores: legs rear view (LRV), legs side view (LSV), fore-udder attachment (FUA), temperament (TP) and milking ease (ME), assuming values between 1 to 9, assigned by a classifier. The objective of the present study was to quantify the percentage of total variation attributed to the effect of classifier for traits evaluated by scores. For this purpose, a univariate animal model using Bayesian approach was implemented. The model proposed for the analyses considered the fixed effects of herd-year of birth of the animal, cow's age (covariate); and random effects of animal, classifier and residual. A Markov chain containing 850.000 samples was created, with a burn-in of 250,000 samples and storage of only 100 sample intervals (thinning), resulting in posterior distributions containing 6,000 samples. The posterior means (and confidence interval; 0.05 – 0.95) for the percentages of the total variation explained by the effect of classifier on the traits studied were: LRV =0.42 (0.29/0.52), LSV = 0.43 (0.29/0.56), FUA= 0.05 (0.00/0.30), TP= 0.39 (0.28/0.48), ME= 0.52 (0.44/0.60). The heritability values for the traits were: LRV= 0.01, LSV= 0.18, FUA= 0.03, TP= 0.07, ME= 0.07. The results indicate the influence of the classifier on the phenotypic variation of the evaluated traits. The magnitude of the estimates obtained can be explained both by factors involved in defining the phenotype and in the data collection process. Decreasing the scale of the variable (1 to 5) may help to improve the accuracy for the classifier's assignment of the score of the animal, assuming a theoretical biological model that explains the variation found in these traits. Possibly the current scale makes differentiation of the distinct phenotypes difficult by simple visual analysis. Finally, the efficient training of classifiers could reduce possible bias in the attribution of the phenotype, caused for example by previous knowledge of the parentage of the animal.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T14:40:23Z
format Article
id doaj.art-292c7152c7ea419f958cdf4d0659e059
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1981-4100
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T14:40:23Z
publishDate 2018-04-01
publisher Instituto de Zootecnia
record_format Article
series Boletim de Indústria Animal
spelling doaj.art-292c7152c7ea419f958cdf4d0659e0592022-12-22T02:42:55ZengInstituto de ZootecniaBoletim de Indústria Animal1981-41002018-04-0174Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattleRafael Guimarães VizonáBruno da Costa PerezAníbal Eugenio Vercesi FilhoAndré Rabelo FernandesRicardo Vieira VenturaJúlio César de Carvalho Balieiro The success of a breeding program invariably depends on the quality of data collected. Visual scores have the advantage of low operating cost for their collection, but they require objectivity, both in definition and in the process of attribution of the phenotype, since they depend on a classifier. In the National breeding program of Gyr dairy cattle (PNMGL), from a total of 18 traits, five are evaluated by visual scores: legs rear view (LRV), legs side view (LSV), fore-udder attachment (FUA), temperament (TP) and milking ease (ME), assuming values between 1 to 9, assigned by a classifier. The objective of the present study was to quantify the percentage of total variation attributed to the effect of classifier for traits evaluated by scores. For this purpose, a univariate animal model using Bayesian approach was implemented. The model proposed for the analyses considered the fixed effects of herd-year of birth of the animal, cow's age (covariate); and random effects of animal, classifier and residual. A Markov chain containing 850.000 samples was created, with a burn-in of 250,000 samples and storage of only 100 sample intervals (thinning), resulting in posterior distributions containing 6,000 samples. The posterior means (and confidence interval; 0.05 – 0.95) for the percentages of the total variation explained by the effect of classifier on the traits studied were: LRV =0.42 (0.29/0.52), LSV = 0.43 (0.29/0.56), FUA= 0.05 (0.00/0.30), TP= 0.39 (0.28/0.48), ME= 0.52 (0.44/0.60). The heritability values for the traits were: LRV= 0.01, LSV= 0.18, FUA= 0.03, TP= 0.07, ME= 0.07. The results indicate the influence of the classifier on the phenotypic variation of the evaluated traits. The magnitude of the estimates obtained can be explained both by factors involved in defining the phenotype and in the data collection process. Decreasing the scale of the variable (1 to 5) may help to improve the accuracy for the classifier's assignment of the score of the animal, assuming a theoretical biological model that explains the variation found in these traits. Possibly the current scale makes differentiation of the distinct phenotypes difficult by simple visual analysis. Finally, the efficient training of classifiers could reduce possible bias in the attribution of the phenotype, caused for example by previous knowledge of the parentage of the animal. http://35.199.65.98:80/index.php/bia/article/view/1720Bayesian inferencevisual scoreszebu
spellingShingle Rafael Guimarães Vizoná
Bruno da Costa Perez
Aníbal Eugenio Vercesi Filho
André Rabelo Fernandes
Ricardo Vieira Ventura
Júlio César de Carvalho Balieiro
Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
Boletim de Indústria Animal
Bayesian inference
visual scores
zebu
title Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
title_full Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
title_fullStr Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
title_full_unstemmed Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
title_short Impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
title_sort impacts of the classifier on results of genetic analysis of score traits related to type and management in gyr dairy cattle
topic Bayesian inference
visual scores
zebu
url http://35.199.65.98:80/index.php/bia/article/view/1720
work_keys_str_mv AT rafaelguimaraesvizona impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle
AT brunodacostaperez impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle
AT anabaleugeniovercesifilho impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle
AT andrarabelofernandes impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle
AT ricardovieiraventura impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle
AT jaoliocasardecarvalhobalieiro impactsoftheclassifieronresultsofgeneticanalysisofscoretraitsrelatedtotypeandmanagementingyrdairycattle