Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas

Lean Manufacturing (LM), inspired by the Toyota Production System, has spread throughout the automotive sector in France over the past twenty years – and from there, gradually, to all sectors of the economy. Requests for ergonomic interventions in Lean-type organizations have become more numerous, l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Tahar-Hakim Benchekroun, Justine Arnoud, Rebecca Arama
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST) 2013-12-01
Series:Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journals.openedition.org/pistes/3589
_version_ 1798028188805234688
author Tahar-Hakim Benchekroun
Justine Arnoud
Rebecca Arama
author_facet Tahar-Hakim Benchekroun
Justine Arnoud
Rebecca Arama
author_sort Tahar-Hakim Benchekroun
collection DOAJ
description Lean Manufacturing (LM), inspired by the Toyota Production System, has spread throughout the automotive sector in France over the past twenty years – and from there, gradually, to all sectors of the economy. Requests for ergonomic interventions in Lean-type organizations have become more numerous, leading ergonomists to question the paradoxical position they find themselves in this type of work organization and to further their understanding thereof. This is likewise the goal of the present paper, which capitalizes on two studies conducted in different Lean systems in order to discuss LM and its paradoxes. The paper relies on a shared methodology combining two approaches – ergonomic work analysis and case study methodology – in order to understand what is at play within the work situations we encountered. Results suggest the existence of three separate approaches to LM. Each of these approaches is defended by different stakeholders who rarely communicate with one another and, indeed, often ignore each other’s approaches: at the top administrative level, there is the “strategic” LM, whose core principles are seemingly written in stone; the second level considers LM as it is “implemented” by middle management, who must rationalize the work force, etc., and produce indicators; and, finally there is the LM level that is “managed” day to day by work teams. The main transformation proposed in our research involved organizing meetings, discussions, and debates between these three stakeholders, while keeping the focus on the daily work activity.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T19:03:47Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29307d715b93457d8a92f4af4c80cac8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1481-9384
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T19:03:47Z
publishDate 2013-12-01
publisher Institut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)
record_format Article
series Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
spelling doaj.art-29307d715b93457d8a92f4af4c80cac82022-12-22T04:07:51ZengInstitut de Recherche Robert-Sauvé en Santé et en Sécurité du Travail (IRSST)Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé1481-93842013-12-0115310.4000/pistes.3589Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de casTahar-Hakim BenchekrounJustine ArnoudRebecca AramaLean Manufacturing (LM), inspired by the Toyota Production System, has spread throughout the automotive sector in France over the past twenty years – and from there, gradually, to all sectors of the economy. Requests for ergonomic interventions in Lean-type organizations have become more numerous, leading ergonomists to question the paradoxical position they find themselves in this type of work organization and to further their understanding thereof. This is likewise the goal of the present paper, which capitalizes on two studies conducted in different Lean systems in order to discuss LM and its paradoxes. The paper relies on a shared methodology combining two approaches – ergonomic work analysis and case study methodology – in order to understand what is at play within the work situations we encountered. Results suggest the existence of three separate approaches to LM. Each of these approaches is defended by different stakeholders who rarely communicate with one another and, indeed, often ignore each other’s approaches: at the top administrative level, there is the “strategic” LM, whose core principles are seemingly written in stone; the second level considers LM as it is “implemented” by middle management, who must rationalize the work force, etc., and produce indicators; and, finally there is the LM level that is “managed” day to day by work teams. The main transformation proposed in our research involved organizing meetings, discussions, and debates between these three stakeholders, while keeping the focus on the daily work activity.http://journals.openedition.org/pistes/3589lean manufacturingwork standardsimplementation of lean systemsactivity analysishealthperformance
spellingShingle Tahar-Hakim Benchekroun
Justine Arnoud
Rebecca Arama
Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
Perspectives Interdisciplinaires sur le Travail et la Santé
lean manufacturing
work standards
implementation of lean systems
activity analysis
health
performance
title Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
title_full Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
title_fullStr Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
title_full_unstemmed Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
title_short Vitalité des activités et rationalité du Lean : deux études de cas
title_sort vitalite des activites et rationalite du lean deux etudes de cas
topic lean manufacturing
work standards
implementation of lean systems
activity analysis
health
performance
url http://journals.openedition.org/pistes/3589
work_keys_str_mv AT taharhakimbenchekroun vitalitedesactivitesetrationaliteduleandeuxetudesdecas
AT justinearnoud vitalitedesactivitesetrationaliteduleandeuxetudesdecas
AT rebeccaarama vitalitedesactivitesetrationaliteduleandeuxetudesdecas