A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties

Background: The application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive off-label r...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Micah MacAskill, MD, Richard Peluso, MD, Jonathan Lash, MD, Timothy E. Hewett, PhD, Matthew Bullock, DO, MPT, Alexander Caughran, MD
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2024-02-01
Series:Arthroplasty Today
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123002157
_version_ 1827349819228684288
author Micah MacAskill, MD
Richard Peluso, MD
Jonathan Lash, MD
Timothy E. Hewett, PhD
Matthew Bullock, DO, MPT
Alexander Caughran, MD
author_facet Micah MacAskill, MD
Richard Peluso, MD
Jonathan Lash, MD
Timothy E. Hewett, PhD
Matthew Bullock, DO, MPT
Alexander Caughran, MD
author_sort Micah MacAskill, MD
collection DOAJ
description Background: The application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive off-label robotic-assisted revision TKA were performed. After virtual revision femoral and tibial components were positioned to achieve “balanced” medial and lateral flexion and extension gaps, the existing primary implants (PI) were removed, and bone cuts were executed with the robotic arm system. Preoperative coronal, sagittal, and axial position of the PI was compared to the final planned positions of the robotic revision implants (RRI) for each subject. A repeated measures ANOVA using the absolute difference in millimeters and degrees between the PI and RRI orientation was completed. Results: Intra-operatively, the virtual gaps were balanced within the planning software followed by successful execution of the plan. There was a statistically significant difference between posterior condylar offset and tibial component positioning for RRI compared to PI. There was no difference between the distal femoral component values between PI and RRI. Conclusions: The sagittal alignment of the revision implants, specifically the femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial component slope, are statistically significant considerations for a stable revision TKA with off-label use of a robotic-arm system. Other potential benefits may include appropriate implant sizing which can affect the resultant ligamentous tension important for a functional revision TKA. Future research and software iterations will be needed to determine the overall accuracy and utility of robotic-assisted revision TKA.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T00:48:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29536f603d8e4c3188633746dba9b322
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2352-3441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T00:48:45Z
publishDate 2024-02-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Arthroplasty Today
spelling doaj.art-29536f603d8e4c3188633746dba9b3222024-02-15T05:24:26ZengElsevierArthroplasty Today2352-34412024-02-0125101310A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee ArthroplastiesMicah MacAskill, MD0Richard Peluso, MD1Jonathan Lash, MD2Timothy E. Hewett, PhD3Matthew Bullock, DO, MPT4Alexander Caughran, MD5Corresponding author. Department of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, 1600 Medical Center Drive, Suite G500, Huntington, WV 25705, USA. Tel.: +1 304 691 1262.; Department of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USADepartment of Orthopaedics, Marshall University Joan C. Edwards School of Medicine, Huntington, WV, USABackground: The application of robotic-assisted arthroplasty in revision knee scenarios continues to evolve. This study compares the pre- and post-revision implant positions in series of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKA) using a robotic arm system. Methods: Twenty-five consecutive off-label robotic-assisted revision TKA were performed. After virtual revision femoral and tibial components were positioned to achieve “balanced” medial and lateral flexion and extension gaps, the existing primary implants (PI) were removed, and bone cuts were executed with the robotic arm system. Preoperative coronal, sagittal, and axial position of the PI was compared to the final planned positions of the robotic revision implants (RRI) for each subject. A repeated measures ANOVA using the absolute difference in millimeters and degrees between the PI and RRI orientation was completed. Results: Intra-operatively, the virtual gaps were balanced within the planning software followed by successful execution of the plan. There was a statistically significant difference between posterior condylar offset and tibial component positioning for RRI compared to PI. There was no difference between the distal femoral component values between PI and RRI. Conclusions: The sagittal alignment of the revision implants, specifically the femoral posterior condylar offset and tibial component slope, are statistically significant considerations for a stable revision TKA with off-label use of a robotic-arm system. Other potential benefits may include appropriate implant sizing which can affect the resultant ligamentous tension important for a functional revision TKA. Future research and software iterations will be needed to determine the overall accuracy and utility of robotic-assisted revision TKA.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123002157Robotic assistedRevisionKnee replacementSagittal alignmentCondylar offset
spellingShingle Micah MacAskill, MD
Richard Peluso, MD
Jonathan Lash, MD
Timothy E. Hewett, PhD
Matthew Bullock, DO, MPT
Alexander Caughran, MD
A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
Arthroplasty Today
Robotic assisted
Revision
Knee replacement
Sagittal alignment
Condylar offset
title A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
title_full A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
title_fullStr A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
title_full_unstemmed A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
title_short A Three-dimensional Comparison of Pre- and Post-component Position in a Series of Off-label Robotic-assisted Revision Total Knee Arthroplasties
title_sort three dimensional comparison of pre and post component position in a series of off label robotic assisted revision total knee arthroplasties
topic Robotic assisted
Revision
Knee replacement
Sagittal alignment
Condylar offset
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352344123002157
work_keys_str_mv AT micahmacaskillmd athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT richardpelusomd athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT jonathanlashmd athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT timothyehewettphd athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT matthewbullockdompt athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT alexandercaughranmd athreedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT micahmacaskillmd threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT richardpelusomd threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT jonathanlashmd threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT timothyehewettphd threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT matthewbullockdompt threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties
AT alexandercaughranmd threedimensionalcomparisonofpreandpostcomponentpositioninaseriesofofflabelroboticassistedrevisiontotalkneearthroplasties