Drivers of partially automated vehicles are blamed for crashes that they cannot reasonably avoid
Abstract People seem to hold the human driver to be primarily responsible when their partially automated vehicle crashes, yet is this reasonable? While the driver is often required to immediately take over from the automation when it fails, placing such high expectations on the driver to remain vigi...
Main Authors: | Niek Beckers, Luciano Cavalcante Siebert, Merijn Bruijnes, Catholijn Jonker, David Abbink |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Nature Portfolio
2022-09-01
|
Series: | Scientific Reports |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-19876-0 |
Similar Items
-
THE NEED FOR ENHANCED HEAVY VEHICLE CRASH INVESTIGATION: BEYOND 'BLAME THE DRIVER'
by: Ivan CIKARA, et al.
Published: (2020-06-01) -
Normative uncertainty and societal preferences: the problem with evaluative standards
by: Sietze Kai Kuilman, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01) -
Moral responsibility and the principle of avoidable blame
by: Gerald K. Harrison
Published: (2004-01-01) -
Reducing social diabetes distress with a conversational agent support system: a three-week technology feasibility evaluation
by: Merijn Bruijnes, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01) -
When the firm prevents the crash: Avoiding market collapse with partial control.
by: Asaf Levi, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)