Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development

The content of the China-US CCUS technology development roadmap is summarized based on the roadmap update in 2019. Qualitative analysis and evaluation were conducted from the perspectives of running CCUS demonstrations or industrial projects, CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline infrastructure, estab...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiao-Yu Li, Xu Gao, Jing-Jing Xie
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-12-01
Series:Atmosphere
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2114
_version_ 1797461476002234368
author Xiao-Yu Li
Xu Gao
Jing-Jing Xie
author_facet Xiao-Yu Li
Xu Gao
Jing-Jing Xie
author_sort Xiao-Yu Li
collection DOAJ
description The content of the China-US CCUS technology development roadmap is summarized based on the roadmap update in 2019. Qualitative analysis and evaluation were conducted from the perspectives of running CCUS demonstrations or industrial projects, CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline infrastructure, established regulatory frameworks, policy support, research and development capabilities, and geological storage resources. A simple analysis of the development status of carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology through relevant patent data is provided. Future planning by China and the United States in terms of planning volume, investment funds, related industries, transportation methods, geological storage, geological utilization, other utilization methods, and incentive policies is compared. Overall, US CCUS technology development is in the leading position in the world; it has entered the stage of small-scale commercial promotion, while the overall development level of China’s CCUS technology is still behind the international advanced level in a small-scale experimental demonstration period, and is still in the catch-up stage. However, as the Chinese government has put forward the strategy of “carbon peaking and carbon neutralization”, CCUS has ushered in a golden opportunity for development in China, and some large-scale industrial demonstration projects have been carried out. This study analyzes China’s advantages and challenges in developing CCUS and gives some suggestions on the direction that China’s CCUS development should take in the future.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T17:19:55Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29713f2773524cd98eae4a17ff747c09
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4433
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T17:19:55Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Atmosphere
spelling doaj.art-29713f2773524cd98eae4a17ff747c092023-11-24T13:13:10ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-12-011312211410.3390/atmos13122114Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology DevelopmentXiao-Yu Li0Xu Gao1Jing-Jing Xie2School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaRailway Engineering Research Institute, China Academy of Railway Sciences Corporation Limited, Beijing 100081, ChinaSchool of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology-Beijing, Beijing 100083, ChinaThe content of the China-US CCUS technology development roadmap is summarized based on the roadmap update in 2019. Qualitative analysis and evaluation were conducted from the perspectives of running CCUS demonstrations or industrial projects, CO<sub>2</sub> pipeline infrastructure, established regulatory frameworks, policy support, research and development capabilities, and geological storage resources. A simple analysis of the development status of carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology through relevant patent data is provided. Future planning by China and the United States in terms of planning volume, investment funds, related industries, transportation methods, geological storage, geological utilization, other utilization methods, and incentive policies is compared. Overall, US CCUS technology development is in the leading position in the world; it has entered the stage of small-scale commercial promotion, while the overall development level of China’s CCUS technology is still behind the international advanced level in a small-scale experimental demonstration period, and is still in the catch-up stage. However, as the Chinese government has put forward the strategy of “carbon peaking and carbon neutralization”, CCUS has ushered in a golden opportunity for development in China, and some large-scale industrial demonstration projects have been carried out. This study analyzes China’s advantages and challenges in developing CCUS and gives some suggestions on the direction that China’s CCUS development should take in the future.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2114United StatesCCUStechnology development roadmap
spellingShingle Xiao-Yu Li
Xu Gao
Jing-Jing Xie
Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
Atmosphere
United States
CCUS
technology development roadmap
title Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
title_full Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
title_fullStr Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
title_short Comparison and Clarification of China and US CCUS Technology Development
title_sort comparison and clarification of china and us ccus technology development
topic United States
CCUS
technology development roadmap
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/12/2114
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoyuli comparisonandclarificationofchinaandusccustechnologydevelopment
AT xugao comparisonandclarificationofchinaandusccustechnologydevelopment
AT jingjingxie comparisonandclarificationofchinaandusccustechnologydevelopment