Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting

This article highlights some of the benefits of computational modeling for theorizing in cognition. We demonstrate how computational models have been used recently to argue that (1) forgetting in short-term memory is based on interference not decay, (2) forgetting in list-learning paradigms is more...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ullrich eEcker, Stephan eLewandowsky
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2012-10-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00400/full
_version_ 1819097170444288000
author Ullrich eEcker
Stephan eLewandowsky
author_facet Ullrich eEcker
Stephan eLewandowsky
author_sort Ullrich eEcker
collection DOAJ
description This article highlights some of the benefits of computational modeling for theorizing in cognition. We demonstrate how computational models have been used recently to argue that (1) forgetting in short-term memory is based on interference not decay, (2) forgetting in list-learning paradigms is more parsimoniously explained by a temporal distinctiveness account than by various forms of consolidation, and (3) intrusion asymmetries that appear when information is learned in different contexts can be explained by temporal context reinstatement rather than labilization and reconsolidation processes.
first_indexed 2024-12-22T00:10:50Z
format Article
id doaj.art-297b869c25d344dabc6980bea41fda51
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T00:10:50Z
publishDate 2012-10-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-297b869c25d344dabc6980bea41fda512022-12-21T18:45:26ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782012-10-01310.3389/fpsyg.2012.0040024515Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgettingUllrich eEcker0Stephan eLewandowsky1University of Western AustraliaUniversity of Western AustraliaThis article highlights some of the benefits of computational modeling for theorizing in cognition. We demonstrate how computational models have been used recently to argue that (1) forgetting in short-term memory is based on interference not decay, (2) forgetting in list-learning paradigms is more parsimoniously explained by a temporal distinctiveness account than by various forms of consolidation, and (3) intrusion asymmetries that appear when information is learned in different contexts can be explained by temporal context reinstatement rather than labilization and reconsolidation processes.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00400/fullcomputational modelinginterferenceconsolidationdecaySIMPLESOB
spellingShingle Ullrich eEcker
Stephan eLewandowsky
Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
Frontiers in Psychology
computational modeling
interference
consolidation
decay
SIMPLE
SOB
title Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
title_full Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
title_fullStr Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
title_full_unstemmed Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
title_short Computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
title_sort computational constraints in cognitive theories of forgetting
topic computational modeling
interference
consolidation
decay
SIMPLE
SOB
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00400/full
work_keys_str_mv AT ullricheecker computationalconstraintsincognitivetheoriesofforgetting
AT stephanelewandowsky computationalconstraintsincognitivetheoriesofforgetting