On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media

This article reviews the attempt to study the notion of alternativity in various fields of knowledge. This generalization is necessary for classifying alternativity as a phenomenon. This will give researchers further boost in the studies of alternative media. The research of alternative media has be...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Oleg A. Dmitriev
Format: Article
Language:Russian
Published: Transbaikal State University 2021-02-01
Series:Гуманитарный вектор
Subjects:
Online Access:http://zabvektor.com/wp-content/uploads/010321040359-Dmitrieva.pdf
_version_ 1798023637258731520
author Oleg A. Dmitriev
author_facet Oleg A. Dmitriev
author_sort Oleg A. Dmitriev
collection DOAJ
description This article reviews the attempt to study the notion of alternativity in various fields of knowledge. This generalization is necessary for classifying alternativity as a phenomenon. This will give researchers further boost in the studies of alternative media. The research of alternative media has been carried out for more than 5 years by the Academy of Media Industry and the media department of HSE University in Moscow. Alternativity is understood by the author as the necessity of choice between several ways that sometimes contradict one another. The author reviews philosophic concepts and elements of alternativity in modern science. Special attention is paid to the issues of alternativity in history, linguistics and natural science. During the analysis the focus is held on the works by J. Habermas and other researchers that viewed the opportunity to create communicative rationale through the elements of various opposing theories which is important for the media analysis. This aims to trace models and principles that could be useful to analyze modern alternative media in online environment. After the analysis of alternative components from various fields of science the author determines key factors that influence the formation of the personal alternative behavior. Here are some of them: the choice to differentiate between correct and false statements, acquiring its own experience through reasoning, the desire for a constant interaction with the people in various forms on various topics, the use of the successful innovations from various scientific concepts, the use of elements that change personal behavior, the desire to relax and seek freedom in alternative virtual word, the necessity to look for new knowledge, facts, figures in the ever-changing environment.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T17:49:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2983442eaad540eebcf2a6f66d5a66a4
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1996-7853
2542-0038
language Russian
last_indexed 2024-04-11T17:49:34Z
publishDate 2021-02-01
publisher Transbaikal State University
record_format Article
series Гуманитарный вектор
spelling doaj.art-2983442eaad540eebcf2a6f66d5a66a42022-12-22T04:11:08ZrusTransbaikal State UniversityГуманитарный вектор1996-78532542-00382021-02-0116116016610.21209/1996-7853-2021-16-1-160-166On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern MediaOleg A. Dmitriev0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9051-5988Higher School of EconomicsThis article reviews the attempt to study the notion of alternativity in various fields of knowledge. This generalization is necessary for classifying alternativity as a phenomenon. This will give researchers further boost in the studies of alternative media. The research of alternative media has been carried out for more than 5 years by the Academy of Media Industry and the media department of HSE University in Moscow. Alternativity is understood by the author as the necessity of choice between several ways that sometimes contradict one another. The author reviews philosophic concepts and elements of alternativity in modern science. Special attention is paid to the issues of alternativity in history, linguistics and natural science. During the analysis the focus is held on the works by J. Habermas and other researchers that viewed the opportunity to create communicative rationale through the elements of various opposing theories which is important for the media analysis. This aims to trace models and principles that could be useful to analyze modern alternative media in online environment. After the analysis of alternative components from various fields of science the author determines key factors that influence the formation of the personal alternative behavior. Here are some of them: the choice to differentiate between correct and false statements, acquiring its own experience through reasoning, the desire for a constant interaction with the people in various forms on various topics, the use of the successful innovations from various scientific concepts, the use of elements that change personal behavior, the desire to relax and seek freedom in alternative virtual word, the necessity to look for new knowledge, facts, figures in the ever-changing environment.http://zabvektor.com/wp-content/uploads/010321040359-Dmitrieva.pdfalternativityalternative mediаmetaphysicseclecticismaudienceindividuallinguistics
spellingShingle Oleg A. Dmitriev
On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
Гуманитарный вектор
alternativity
alternative mediа
metaphysics
eclecticism
audience
individual
linguistics
title On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
title_full On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
title_fullStr On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
title_full_unstemmed On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
title_short On Alternativity as a Notion in Science and Modern Media
title_sort on alternativity as a notion in science and modern media
topic alternativity
alternative mediа
metaphysics
eclecticism
audience
individual
linguistics
url http://zabvektor.com/wp-content/uploads/010321040359-Dmitrieva.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT olegadmitriev onalternativityasanotioninscienceandmodernmedia