Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers
Adding relaxation techniques during nap or auditory stimulation of EEG slow oscillation (SO) during nighttime sleep may limit cognitive impairments in sleep-deprived subjects, potentially through alleviating stress-releasing effects. We compared daytime sleepiness, cognitive performances, and saliva...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-02-01
|
| Series: | Brain Sciences |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/229 |
| _version_ | 1797482125070434304 |
|---|---|
| author | Danielle Gomez-Merino Catherine Drogou Eden Debellemaniere Mégane Erblang Rodolphe Dorey Mathias Guillard Pascal Van Beers Melanie Thouard Robin Masson Fabien Sauvet Damien Leger Clément Bougard Pierrick J. Arnal Arnaud Rabat Mounir Chennaoui |
| author_facet | Danielle Gomez-Merino Catherine Drogou Eden Debellemaniere Mégane Erblang Rodolphe Dorey Mathias Guillard Pascal Van Beers Melanie Thouard Robin Masson Fabien Sauvet Damien Leger Clément Bougard Pierrick J. Arnal Arnaud Rabat Mounir Chennaoui |
| author_sort | Danielle Gomez-Merino |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Adding relaxation techniques during nap or auditory stimulation of EEG slow oscillation (SO) during nighttime sleep may limit cognitive impairments in sleep-deprived subjects, potentially through alleviating stress-releasing effects. We compared daytime sleepiness, cognitive performances, and salivary stress biomarker responses in 11 volunteers (aged 18–36) who underwent 5 days of sleep restriction (SR, 3 h per night, with 30 min of daily nap) under three successive conditions: control (SR-CT), relaxation techniques added to daily nap (SR-RT), and auditory stimulation of sleep slow oscillations (SO) during nighttime sleep (SR-NS). Test evaluation was performed at baseline (BASE), the fifth day of chronic SR (SR5), and the third and fifth days after sleep recovery (REC3, REC5, respectively). At SR5, less degradation was observed for percentage of commission errors in the executive Go–noGo inhibition task in SR-RT condition compared to SR-CT, and for sleepiness score in SR-NS condition compared both to SR-CT and SR-RT. Beneficial effects of SR-RT and SR-NS were additionally observed on these two parameters and on salivary α-amylase (sAA) at REC3 and REC5. Adding relaxation techniques to naps may help performance in inhibition response, and adding nocturnal auditory stimulation of SO sleep may benefit daytime sleepiness during sleep restriction with persistent effects during recovery. The two strategies activated the autonomic nervous system, as shown by the sAA response. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:26:45Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2987530514fe4727bff92baa6b69fb11 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2076-3425 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T22:26:45Z |
| publishDate | 2022-02-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Brain Sciences |
| spelling | doaj.art-2987530514fe4727bff92baa6b69fb112023-11-23T19:03:36ZengMDPI AGBrain Sciences2076-34252022-02-0112222910.3390/brainsci12020229Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress BiomarkersDanielle Gomez-Merino0Catherine Drogou1Eden Debellemaniere2Mégane Erblang3Rodolphe Dorey4Mathias Guillard5Pascal Van Beers6Melanie Thouard7Robin Masson8Fabien Sauvet9Damien Leger10Clément Bougard11Pierrick J. Arnal12Arnaud Rabat13Mounir Chennaoui14Unité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceEcole du Val de Grace, 75005 Paris, FranceEcole du Val de Grace, 75005 Paris, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceVIgilance FAtigue SOMmeil et Santé Publique, Université de Paris, 75004 Paris, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceDreem SAS, 75009 Paris, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceUnité Fatigue et Vigilance, Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées (IRBA), 91223 Bretigny-sur-Orge, FranceAdding relaxation techniques during nap or auditory stimulation of EEG slow oscillation (SO) during nighttime sleep may limit cognitive impairments in sleep-deprived subjects, potentially through alleviating stress-releasing effects. We compared daytime sleepiness, cognitive performances, and salivary stress biomarker responses in 11 volunteers (aged 18–36) who underwent 5 days of sleep restriction (SR, 3 h per night, with 30 min of daily nap) under three successive conditions: control (SR-CT), relaxation techniques added to daily nap (SR-RT), and auditory stimulation of sleep slow oscillations (SO) during nighttime sleep (SR-NS). Test evaluation was performed at baseline (BASE), the fifth day of chronic SR (SR5), and the third and fifth days after sleep recovery (REC3, REC5, respectively). At SR5, less degradation was observed for percentage of commission errors in the executive Go–noGo inhibition task in SR-RT condition compared to SR-CT, and for sleepiness score in SR-NS condition compared both to SR-CT and SR-RT. Beneficial effects of SR-RT and SR-NS were additionally observed on these two parameters and on salivary α-amylase (sAA) at REC3 and REC5. Adding relaxation techniques to naps may help performance in inhibition response, and adding nocturnal auditory stimulation of SO sleep may benefit daytime sleepiness during sleep restriction with persistent effects during recovery. The two strategies activated the autonomic nervous system, as shown by the sAA response.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/229sleep-deprivedrecoveryauditory EEG slow oscillationrelaxation techniquecognitionstress biomarkers |
| spellingShingle | Danielle Gomez-Merino Catherine Drogou Eden Debellemaniere Mégane Erblang Rodolphe Dorey Mathias Guillard Pascal Van Beers Melanie Thouard Robin Masson Fabien Sauvet Damien Leger Clément Bougard Pierrick J. Arnal Arnaud Rabat Mounir Chennaoui Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers Brain Sciences sleep-deprived recovery auditory EEG slow oscillation relaxation technique cognition stress biomarkers |
| title | Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers |
| title_full | Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers |
| title_fullStr | Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers |
| title_full_unstemmed | Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers |
| title_short | Strategies to Limit Cognitive Impairments under Sleep Restriction: Relationship to Stress Biomarkers |
| title_sort | strategies to limit cognitive impairments under sleep restriction relationship to stress biomarkers |
| topic | sleep-deprived recovery auditory EEG slow oscillation relaxation technique cognition stress biomarkers |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/12/2/229 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT daniellegomezmerino strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT catherinedrogou strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT edendebellemaniere strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT meganeerblang strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT rodolphedorey strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT mathiasguillard strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT pascalvanbeers strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT melaniethouard strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT robinmasson strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT fabiensauvet strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT damienleger strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT clementbougard strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT pierrickjarnal strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT arnaudrabat strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers AT mounirchennaoui strategiestolimitcognitiveimpairmentsundersleeprestrictionrelationshiptostressbiomarkers |